fisky wrote:
Maybe someone with legal background can expand on this. To me, intent is a very high bar to reach. I guess we'll know in a few weeks what a jury thinks.
When you stab someone with a knife, you intend to kill them.
-
72
-
My client did indeed visit the MHS, uh, tent, but, BUT, he did not intend to kill anyone. He, um, uh, he, ahh... we intend to prove that the p-p-p-p-prosecution's case is circumstantial, and uh, coincidental. Thank you.
64 -
Question for KA defenders.
If he was so afraid of Austin:
a. Why did he remain in the tent after being asked to leave?
b. Why issue a threat?
134 -
c. Do you think that he would have behaved in this manner towards a coach?
34 -
slip and slide wrote:
fully informed juror wrote:
So, let me get this straight.
If there was a black juror, she would hear all this testimony from eyewitnesses, but vote not guilty because Anthony is black?
Am I missing something?
Why else would it matter whether blacks are on the jury other than to create a hung trial?
This. A potential juror even admitted the quiet part out loud...that he wouldnt be able to convict another black regardless of the evidence against him. Thats why dems are wanting as many blacks as possible on the jury, because it would enable Karmelo to get off with no punishment, despite the massive amount of evidence against him. What matters is not the jurors, but the evidence prevented. Not looking good for the dem hero Karmelo
What is your basis for saying that this juror isn't unique to himself? Did any other juror, black or otherwise, express such a statement? Surely many of the jurors who weren't excused are Democrat, so what exactly is your basis for making the extrapolations you're making beyond your own ignorance and bias?
23 -
douglas burke wrote:
He is cooked wrote:
The fix is in. This case is too racially charged. He is going to prison.
Race Is Irrelevant if the Jurors are all fair and unbiased, And If a Juror is proven to be Unfair and Biased they will be dismissed from the case. A Juror is Like a Judge or Referee, Example if Ohio State is Playing Michigan in a Football Game, The Referee is supposed to be fair and Impartial, if he is a huge fan of one of the schools, Or if he is betting Money on the Outcome of the Game he will not be allowed to referee that game.
Which would be a good argument to not let any whites on the Jury.
312 -
Ghost of Rodney King wrote:
douglas burke wrote:
Race Is Irrelevant if the Jurors are all fair and unbiased, And If a Juror is proven to be Unfair and Biased they will be dismissed from the case. A Juror is Like a Judge or Referee, Example if Ohio State is Playing Michigan in a Football Game, The Referee is supposed to be fair and Impartial, if he is a huge fan of one of the schools, Or if he is betting Money on the Outcome of the Game he will not be allowed to referee that game.
Which would be a good argument to not let any whites on the Jury.
Reporting from the trial indicates:
Witness Lori Ann Carson testified that she saw Cyrus running away, looking frightened, while being chased by Rick Chow and his son. She said she did not see anything in his hands.
Prosecutors said three witnesses testified they did not see Cyrus point a weapon.
Prosecutors also referred to four eyewitnesses whose testimony did not support the claim that Cyrus pointed a gun.
Investigators testified that they found no evidence that Cyrus had pointed a gun at anyone, and an officer testified that immediately after the shooting Andy Chow did not mention Cyrus pointing a gun at him. Cyrus was shot in the back. This is the 3rd time Andy Chow has shot at an alleged shoplifter...each time claiming the alleged thief pointed a gun at him.This post was edited 9 minutes after it was posted.47 -
What if Chud The Builder ends up with an all black jury or one that consisted of not one white person? Although I know there is zero chance of that happening. My question is do you think white america would not claim foul play? Of course they would. They would say there is no way he can receive a fair trial. Yet when Blacks say that about the Anthony trial they are being unreasonable. They should have faith in the justice system. Nonsense!
45 -
pretty simple... wrote:
fisky wrote:
Maybe someone with legal background can expand on this. To me, intent is a very high bar to reach. I guess we'll know in a few weeks what a jury thinks.
When you stab someone with a knife, you intend to kill them.
I was wrong. I thought "intent" meant a pre-determined or planned action ahead of time. I looked it up.
Planning ahead of time is part of the definition, but the legal definition of intent also means taking an action that would knowingly cause severe injury or death.
11 -
He is cooked wrote:
The fix is in. This case is too racially charged. He is going to prison.
Yes, because he slaughtered a teen in front of witnesses.
92 -
Ghost of Rodney King wrote:
douglas burke wrote:
Race Is Irrelevant if the Jurors are all fair and unbiased, And If a Juror is proven to be Unfair and Biased they will be dismissed from the case. A Juror is Like a Judge or Referee, Example if Ohio State is Playing Michigan in a Football Game, The Referee is supposed to be fair and Impartial, if he is a huge fan of one of the schools, Or if he is betting Money on the Outcome of the Game he will not be allowed to referee that game.
Which would be a good argument to not let any whites on the Jury.
And don’t let four black student-athletes that were witnesses testify against KA.
Now that it is known that EVERYBODY who witnessed the situation testified AGAINST KA, how about checking your racism at the door? Nahhhhhh… we all know that’ll never happen. Remove yourself.
82 -
Ghost of Rodney King wrote:
douglas burke wrote:
Race Is Irrelevant if the Jurors are all fair and unbiased, And If a Juror is proven to be Unfair and Biased they will be dismissed from the case. A Juror is Like a Judge or Referee, Example if Ohio State is Playing Michigan in a Football Game, The Referee is supposed to be fair and Impartial, if he is a huge fan of one of the schools, Or if he is betting Money on the Outcome of the Game he will not be allowed to referee that game.
Which would be a good argument to not let any whites on the Jury.
Which would be a good argument to not let any blacks on the Jury.
See which post gets removed.hmmmmm
53 -
pretty simple... wrote:
fisky wrote:
Maybe someone with legal background can expand on this. To me, intent is a very high bar to reach. I guess we'll know in a few weeks what a jury thinks.
When you stab someone with a knife, you intend to kill them.
I was on a jury for a murder case many years ago when this came up during deliberations. There was one holdout for intentional murder (2nd degree in NY, I think, at the time). Took about 3 sentences to convince the one juror that when you stab someone in the chest there is only one result you're looking for.
Guilty
32 -
Same patterns of racism against whites wrote:
Ghost of Rodney King wrote:
Which would be a good argument to not let any whites on the Jury.
And don’t let four black student-athletes that were witnesses testify against KA.
Now that it is known that EVERYBODY who witnessed the situation testified AGAINST KA, how about checking your racism at the door?
The black witnesses will not deter KA supporters. Those witnesses will be called sellouts, or worse. All for telling the truth as to what they saw that awful day.
62 -
13
-
You don't take a knife to a track meet, a folding knife already opened, this kid was headed towards a very sad ending if not now, down the road.
00 -
I think he's guilty.
32 -
leisure suit larry wrote:
Closing arguments tomorrow.
Defense didn't put much on the table.
Melo's going to prison.
No defense, just like his namesake.
11
2 posts were removed from this page.
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.