Armstronglivs wrote:
I didn't say he was convicted of crimes in a criminal court but that the finding of liability in a civil court for causing deaths means, in everyday parlance, that he effectively committed those crimes. He was adjudicated to have intentionally killed his ex wife and lover. That means he murdered them, which also means that in fact if not in law he committed the crime of murder.
It is similar to the judge in the defamation case against Trump who said the finding of sexual assault against Trump effectively means he "raped" E Jean Carroll. But it is NOT a criminal conviction and is not being argued that it is. It is of course beyond you because you are a bot and not actually human.
I have to remind you that you said "a court said OJ committed the crimes". No court said he committed any crime. If you truly passed the bar, you should know why what you said is wrong, and know how to correct it to reflect what the court really said.
Instead you do all these songs and dances, and your signature weird analogies. You simply don't want to admit it, but you are plainly wrong, again.



