4:29:20 - Oprah Winfrey
4:58:25 - Al Gore
Oprah incorporated core strength training one month before the marathon which allowed her to rub elbows with a whole different caliber of athletes. Gore never achieved such excellence in the running arena.
4:29:20 - Oprah Winfrey
4:58:25 - Al Gore
Oprah incorporated core strength training one month before the marathon which allowed her to rub elbows with a whole different caliber of athletes. Gore never achieved such excellence in the running arena.
escargot wrote:
Lomborg fan wrote:you my friend are the one sounding like an uneducated moron. Any arguments of your own (refering to dissending respectable thinkers is ok too)? -
Is this snark: 'refering', 'dissending', the strange second sentence? If it is, bravo! If it isn't, please try again and ,when you do, take a second or two to proof-read your work so that it makes some coherent point.
Ah, the old your spelling and grammar sucks routine. Mostly used by people who have failed in a debate.
and he calls himself a man.
Don't be obtuse.
My point which you (choose to..?) ignore is that if someone is going to call someone an uneducated moron then he should at least spell correctly and write with at least a little clarity.
As for your point about losing a debate, do you really consider 'you're an uneducated moron' a deciding point in an argument?!?! If so, then here's my argument: You're a stupid head.
Al Gore didn't win by myself, the UN panel (which Al Gore is apart of) won the nobel peace prize. So it's common mis-interpretation the media like to throw out there.
escargot wrote:
Don't be obtuse.
My point which you (choose to..?) ignore is that if someone is going to call someone an uneducated moron then he should at least spell correctly and write with at least a little clarity.
As for your point about losing a debate, do you really consider 'you're an uneducated moron' a deciding point in an argument?!?! If so, then here's my argument: You're a stupid head.
Your evidence IS compelling. After all, you just insulted me... there's enough evidence there to go around.
thoughts? wrote:
Everyone who criticizes Gore for winning this and promoting global warming has no clue. Sure, he may have a 15,000 square foot house, 72 different cars, and a private jet. But you forget one thing. He is a better person than us! He is allowed to do these things! Don't be jealous because you are still living in your mother's basement, drooling on yourself and you play on letsrun. Gore deserves every bit of praise he gets, and he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. Think of the kiddies! And the dogs! And the little dolphins that play in the sea!
It's not that he's rich that pisses people off or make people jealous of him, it's the fact he's telling us to conserve energy while he hasn't made any effort to conserve at all.
I wonder if all those calling Gore a hypocrite for flying a plane and living in a big house while espousing a need to protect the environment feel that George Bush is a hypocrite for claiming to be a man of God, while his policies have led to the death of thousands of Americans and 100,000+ iraqui men, women and children. Doesnt the bible somewhere say \\\"thou shalt not kill\\\'?
A couple of classic reader comments following the linked article below:
Can anyone tell me what the ideal temperature of the earth should be? It could be that an increase of 2-3 degrees could increase food production worldwide and end global hunger everywhere. Of course at the rate we are going that won't happen for several hundred more years. Oh, unless you factor in Gores hot air.
- Steve Foster, Sharpsburg GA
Excellent article! Scientists know that the earth goes through periods of warming and cooling, and this process takes geologic ages to accomplish. Our present phase is within normal limits. Thirty years ago alarmists were trying to frighten people with global cooling. Now it's global warming. They're betting on the ignorance of the masses.
- Pricey, Orange County
IMO, Gore is an absolute oportunistic moron. He is in fact "betting on the ignorance of the masses", because considering that he himself is ignorant, he knows them so well.
Also, not that an academic record is everything, but shouldn't it give you pause that the mouthpiece for this junk science basically got straight C's at Harvard with a D in a science course, he received 5 F's at Vanderbilt Divinity School and dropped out after three semesters, and then finally dropped out of Divinity Law School after receiving mostly C's on his transcript. That said, he was ultimately successful in following his father into the family business, as a U.S. Senator.
Correction: Vanderbilt Law School (not Divinity)
If grades are what interest you and it seems that tey do, please check the grades of your hero Beorge Bush,(C's and d's as i recall) and compare them to your favorite whipping boy Bill Clinton (straight A's) Either grades are importnt or theyre not. Are bad grades important only if they belong to a democrat and unimportant if they belong to a republican?Are good grades unimportant if they belong to a democrat and important if they belong to a republcan?
Do you feel stupid sonny?
Century 21 wrote:
mufafa wrote:Would he have been a worse president that GWB?
Is that even possible?
Jimmy Carter?
Public survey say the worst presidential regimes are
1. W. Bush
2. Nixon
3. Reagan
4. LBJ
5. Truman
Carter and Clinton were low on the list.
Wow! Obtuse it is,then. And, I no longer think it's an act. Subtlety, logic, irony are all lost on you. I can see why the guy on the other thread wants to quit teaching high school. Now, so do I. You're unteachable.
Knockwurst wrote:
Public survey say the worst presidential regimes are
1. W. Bush
2. Nixon
3. Reagan
4. LBJ
5. Truman
Carter and Clinton were low on the list.
citation, or did you make up the poll?
ronnie raygun, without his funding of the mujahideen there would be no al-quaida, the ussr would have wiped bin-laden, hektmayor and omar off the face of the earth in the 80s.i think that qualifies as worst decision ever by a US President (then there is his little penchant for supporting death squads and funneling weapons to our enemies both of which constitute treason but hey, who's counting)
Century 21 wrote:
mufafa wrote:Would he have been a worse president that GWB?
Is that even possible?
herbkarp wrote:
I wonder if all those calling Gore a hypocrite for flying a plane and living in a big house while espousing a need to protect the environment feel that George Bush is a hypocrite for claiming to be a man of God, while his policies have led to the death of thousands of Americans and 100,000+ iraqui men, women and children. Doesnt the bible somewhere say \"thou shalt not kill\'?
God sent people to war...you've got the wrong idea here about the concept.
Like I said, grades aren't everything, but they are a piece of the puzzle. I never claimed GW was a genius and never compared his academic record to Clinton's. The only claim I made was (and again, it was IMO) that Gore is an opportunistic moron that is preying on, as the writer said, "the ignorance of the masses". If you could learn how to read and then post an intelligent response then I might possibly consider feeling stupid, but sorry, not there yet. Excellent attempt, however.
citation, or did you make up the poll?
The American People
i'd be more proud if Al and Tipper just lost some weight.