Nobby Nomates wrote:
You've lied about it...
Please cite.
Nobby Nomates wrote:
You've lied about it...
Please cite.
The pleasure is all mine:
It is not, however, the job of the interpretor to pass any sort of value judgement on the message.That is a lie.
I have provided you sources which indicate otherwise.
Any other "lies?"
Nebraska? Get a life.
Nebraska, Maryland, New Jersey, etc.
You just don't know how to stop lying do you?
You have yet to point out any lies I have told. You can huff and puff until you are blue in the face, but you won't be able to document any.
I "documented" your major lie, and you have yet to prove that it isn't a lie. You first, lying weasel.
I provided links to support my position. You may not like it, but you cannot deny that they are credible sources.
It wasn't a credible source (so I guess I just did). Trouble is for every source you supplied, I've supplied several to show that your "position" is a lie. You are a lying weasel.
The state courts of Nebraska, Maryland, and New Jersey are not credible? If you believe that, then it is you, my friend, who lacks credibility.
Nebraska dis directly contradicted by New York, Maryland and New Jersey. Unlike you, you lying weasel, I know how to read.
Perhaps you know how to read, but your reading comprehension is lacking. Each of the states I cited contains a form of the Canon I provided earlier. This is indisputable.
Are you two finished jagging each other off yet?
what's the infatuation with weasels?
Another lie. I cited Maryland and New York, not you. So it is disputable. Liar.
I'm guessing that's a no.
Maybe he realized the futility of trying be an even bigger, more annoying, disingenuous, pompous, arrogant, anal-retentive dickhead than you.
Since my intent of the last three pages has been to be annoying, pompous, and arrogant (I know for a fact that I haven't been disingenuous) I glad to know that I have succeeded. What I don't understand is, since this aim was so evident and has been for quite a while, why you've been following the thread? Are you contractually obliged to read this? If not, why follow a thread that annoys you, and why comment?
If you don't like the discussion here's some advice: DON'T CLICK ON THE LINK.
Nobby Nomates wrote:
Another lie. I cited Maryland and New York, not you. So it is disputable. Liar.
I never mentioned New York. My citations were from Nebraska, Maryland, and New Jersey.