Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
He's wrong so frequently that you'll have to track in real time
Nobody has ever been as frequently wrong over the years as much as one of your very own, Flagpole.
You mean how I declared Biden would win against Trump, and how I got all the states right except Florida?
Who did you say would win again? Got it.
Flagpole wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Nobody has ever been as frequently wrong over the years as much as one of your very own, Flagpole.
You mean how I declared Biden would win against Trump, and how I got all the states right except Florida?
Who did you say would win again? Got it.
Just off the top of my head, Hillary winning in 2016, Mueller/Russian collusion, Trump indictment, Kavanaugh will never be voted into SCOTUS. I'm sure there are many more items. 2020 was tainted with fraud, that is the only reason Biden "won."
It’s September and you guys are still arguing about this, incredible. It’s common knowledge that Biden did not legitimately win the election but they had to let him take office so the radical right didn’t have another Jan 6. Watch the news sometime you dunces.
jamin wrote:
https://grrrgraphics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/a_tipping_point.jpg
You got the vaccine you sell out weakling.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
2020 was tainted with fraud, that is the only reason Biden "won."
You are out of your mind.
Flagpole wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
2020 was tainted with fraud, that is the only reason Biden "won."
You are out of your mind.
Funny how Flagpole responded but failed to address these items ..."Hillary winning in 2016, Mueller/Russian collusion, Trump indictment, Kavanaugh will never be voted into SCOTUS."
Sally Vixxxxxxxxens wrote:
agip wrote:
Imma start a list of Gary's predictions and will post it when I feel like it.
Please post your predictions on the 2022 mid-terms. We can all have a good laugh at my family's Thanksgiving dinner.
And just like that, another wrong prediction… you will be all alone on thanksgiving
Trollminator wrote:
😅
https://twitter.com/maggienyt/status/1443376084062543872?s=21
Back to Trump again???
Trollminator wrote:
https://twitter.com/45rapekatiejohn/status/1443510742616100866?s=21
Back to Trump AGAIN?????
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FAd7FIZXEAczO18?format=jpg&name=smallClown World Resident wrote:
Make sure everyone has updated their talking points. The new $3.5 trillion bill is actually a $0 bill! I'm sure everyone will believe that. So funny to watch this administration flail around like this.
https://twitter.com/TheFirstonTV/status/1443240132728041480
It's good politics to put out a provocative sound bite like this. Now more people than ever understand that the two-bill infrastructure package is paid for. This is in sharp contrast to Trump's tax cuts for the rich, which have made massive contributions to the national debt.
It's very sad that nobody here is talking about the substance of the package. This is the most important legislation of our lifetime and nobody wants to discuss it.
I am here to say that for the first time, I am optimistic about its passage. This package has so much good stuff in it that many Republicans would vote for it if they could get away with it politically.
All this posturing from certain Democrats is, I believe, just posturing. They will have to vote for the full package in the end or the entire Democratic party goes down. On the other hand, if the package passes, Democrats will have a lot of wildly popular provisions they can run on. And with progressives holding the line, it's looking to me like Democrats will actually get this done.
This is an important story, I think.
It does some work to describe Biden's appeal.
In a nutshell: People do not feel great fires of hate or love toward Joe Biden.
Which sounds bad, but in a 2 party system, with so many votes locked up and only a few at play, not alienating people seems to be Joe's electoral magic.
This survey finds that sure, Joe's approval ratings are falling. But most just mildly disapprove, suggesting they can be won back, and that in the end they would vote for the D over the monster Trump.
The conventional wisdom is that a candidate needs to light fire in people to win. That's why so many spankists yell things like 'Joe's rallies were tiny therefore the only explanation of how he won is that he cheated.' Well politics is more complicated than that, spanky fans.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/29/biden-objectors-2022-election-514739
Fat hurts wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FAd7FIZXEAczO18?format=jpg&name=smallIt's good politics to put out a provocative sound bite like this. Now more people than ever understand that the two-bill infrastructure package is paid for. This is in sharp contrast to Trump's tax cuts for the rich, which have made massive contributions to the national debt.
It's very sad that nobody here is talking about the substance of the package. This is the most important legislation of our lifetime and nobody wants to discuss it.
I am here to say that for the first time, I am optimistic about its passage. This package has so much good stuff in it that many Republicans would vote for it if they could get away with it politically.
All this posturing from certain Democrats is, I believe, just posturing. They will have to vote for the full package in the end or the entire Democratic party goes down. On the other hand, if the package passes, Democrats will have a lot of wildly popular provisions they can run on. And with progressives holding the line, it's looking to me like Democrats will actually get this done.
I'm only half following this but isn't the most likely outcome a much smaller infrastructure bill? in the 1-2T zone?
Then the Dems can point at getting done what the former 'great builder/deal maker' couldn't get done
and the Rs can claim they cut trillions of spending.
win win.
But I can't follow the ins and outs of all this.
Sally Vixxxxxxxxens wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
😅
https://twitter.com/maggienyt/status/1443376084062543872?s=21Back to Trump again???
Well, he's your undisputed leader and hero so of course back to trump. When you and millions of your fellow "conservatives" divorce yourselves from the stone cold loser and admit he was the most horrible thing that has happened to the US in a long time, and that he lost, then we can think about moving on.
Sally Vixxxxxxxxens wrote:
https://247sports.com/college/minnesota/Board/104592/Contents/Matt-Gaetz-Exonerated-Accuser-Charged-with-Extortion-169996917/
So... where is your proof of exoneration? Is this like the Mueller investigation where people pretend that trump was exonerated but in fact it was never determined?
agip wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
It's good politics to put out a provocative sound bite like this. Now more people than ever understand that the two-bill infrastructure package is paid for. This is in sharp contrast to Trump's tax cuts for the rich, which have made massive contributions to the national debt.
It's very sad that nobody here is talking about the substance of the package. This is the most important legislation of our lifetime and nobody wants to discuss it.
I am here to say that for the first time, I am optimistic about its passage. This package has so much good stuff in it that many Republicans would vote for it if they could get away with it politically.
All this posturing from certain Democrats is, I believe, just posturing. They will have to vote for the full package in the end or the entire Democratic party goes down. On the other hand, if the package passes, Democrats will have a lot of wildly popular provisions they can run on. And with progressives holding the line, it's looking to me like Democrats will actually get this done.
I'm only half following this but isn't the most likely outcome a much smaller infrastructure bill? in the 1-2T zone?
Then the Dems can point at getting done what the former 'great builder/deal maker' couldn't get done
and the Rs can claim they cut trillions of spending.
win win.
But I can't follow the ins and outs of all this.
I think the final size of the package is anyone's guess. But it's looking to me like the two-track package is more likely to pass than not. And that's why I am encouraged because the climate stuff will likely stay in and that is the most important part.
agip wrote:
This is an important story, I think.
It does some work to describe Biden's appeal.
In a nutshell: People do not feel great fires of hate or love toward Joe Biden.
Which sounds bad, but in a 2 party system, with so many votes locked up and only a few at play, not alienating people seems to be Joe's electoral magic.
This survey finds that sure, Joe's approval ratings are falling. But most just mildly disapprove, suggesting they can be won back, and that in the end they would vote for the D over the monster Trump.
The conventional wisdom is that a candidate needs to light fire in people to win. That's why so many spankists yell things like 'Joe's rallies were tiny therefore the only explanation of how he won is that he cheated.' Well politics is more complicated than that, spanky fans.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/29/biden-objectors-2022-election-514739
As long as the mouth breathers nominate Trump (which is a certainty unless he's prevented from running), Biden will remain POTUS.
