Kind of funny how the DIers are crying about mid-season results not being an indicator because they didn't run full squads. I don't believe Kane or Knobloch raced DIII nationals.
Kind of funny how the DIers are crying about mid-season results not being an indicator because they didn't run full squads. I don't believe Kane or Knobloch raced DIII nationals.
Prozac Nation wrote:
Kind of funny how the DIers are crying about mid-season results not being an indicator because they didn't run full squads. I don't believe Kane or Knobloch raced DIII nationals.
Who is complaining about full squads? The only time they raced D1 schools they got whalloped by the 2nd to last place finisher.
While their are many quality D11 & D111 runners along with a select few outstanding teams I think we all know that the depth of most ranked D1 teams is on another level than even the best of D11 & D11. While D11 is referred by some as JV and D111 as grade 13/prep school athletically, take each level for what it is, college athletics at a fair and competitive level.
[quote]ehhhh wrote:
That isn't f****** interesting at all.
quote]
Feel free not to read it, and rather than opening your pie hole, just go eat a bowl of dicks.
Ed, don't you have results to post from the wrong year somewhere?
umok? wrote:
Who is complaining about full squads? The only time they raced D1 schools they got whalloped by the 2nd to last place finisher.
I didn't think they lost at all during the season, I could be wrong though.
No wrote:
umok? wrote:Who is complaining about full squads? The only time they raced D1 schools they got whalloped by the 2nd to last place finisher.
I didn't think they lost at all during the season, I could be wrong though.
My bad, I saw some results posted earlier where someone compared them to Florida State at Notre Dame and assumed they were in the same race. Separate race, but same course on the same day so I think its much more valid to draw conclusions from these results than some of comparisons others were trying to make.