Dementia Joe supporters continue to ignore:
https://theintercept.com/2020/04/24/new-evidence-tara-reade-joe-biden/
Dementia Joe supporters continue to ignore:
https://theintercept.com/2020/04/24/new-evidence-tara-reade-joe-biden/
Press conference today was over in a flash, and fat boy & pence didn’t take questions. Ouch.
13 year old child, the shame.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Smorbun wrote:
You can't even get your memes right. To settle means to do it, just not enthusiastically. Settling for Biden means people will vote for him, you nimrod. Voters have to settle for Biden, because the alternative is Trump. An enthusiastic vote doesn't count more than a lukewarm vote.
FL, OH, PA, WI, MI, AZ all polling strongly for Biden. You are a moron for believing Trump will win. You actually have a shot at surpassing Sally as the dumbest poster here. That is remarkable, but you have proven you are up to the challenge.
Enjoy your loss.
It also means they are apathetic voters and some will stay home, dimwit. When you lose on election night, you will win the stupidest poster championship. Your day of reckoning is coming.
Enjoy your loss.
Thanks for playing.
No it doesn't. When you settle, that means you do it. If you stay home and don't vote, you are not settling. You are crazy and stupid.
Joe Biden is proving to be a brilliant campaigner.
He underspent Bernie and smoked him.
Now Joe is just playing it cool while he is winning
virtually all the swing states.
And his favorability numbers improve .
Or...a baked potato could beat Trump.
Same difference.
https://twitter.com/mattgrossmann/status/1253823153555603456?s=21
Trump ally Bolsonaro in Brazil is presiding over a virtual genocide from Covid-19, but he hasn’t even admitted it’s a problem yet.
All the best people!
Aaaand here we go:
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/86094
It looks like Trump has been busing in protestors to cities to cry about the lockdowns. Where do such morans come from? The same protestors are likely showing up in different cities. Cities they would never go to otherwise.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/us/politics/coronavirus-protests-trump.html
agip wrote:
Joe Biden is proving to be a brilliant campaigner.
He underspent Bernie and smoked him.
Now Joe is just playing it cool while he is winning
virtually all the swing states.
And his favorability numbers improve .
Or...a baked potato could beat Trump.
Same difference.
https://twitter.com/mattgrossmann/status/1253823153555603456?s=21
Biden's resurgence is about nothing other than the impotence of the primary system for the major party nominations. If the debates were not designed to make a trivial farce of issues, voters would have had a chance to see that Biden has been on the wrong side of history at nearly every turn in his career. But most voters do not know this. Canvassing for likely Democratic voters in seven states in the past three months, I talked to lifelong Democrats who had no idea Elizabeth Warren was a sitting senator, who refused to believe Joe Biden had supported the invasion of Iraq in 2003, who had no idea of how he treated Anita Hill, who had no idea of his support for crime bills that essentially targeted African American neighborhoods. Biden's resurgence is not because some conservative liberals don't really care about progressive issues (though they would never admit it), and because many other voters just do not have easy access to important data. IF ... IF.. the debates were more than sound bite circuses, if the press that the average voter had easy access to presented genuine discussions of issues, candidates like Biden would not even be relevant (and Donald Trump would have long ago been in jail). But we don't have such a system. We have a facile process that discourages working people from an opportunity to access thoughtful discussions of the issues that have grave consequence for their lives. If Biden is elected he will restore the rule of law from the criminal regime of Donald Trump. That will be good. But the wealth gap will continue to expand, and the climate crisis will not be addressed. This is our choice in November--a quick death or a slow death. Not a great choice.
You’ve ignored Bernie. As much as I personally support him, there clearly was no problem with voter recognition, etc. Voters went with a choice they considered safer.
Rigged,
Please don't drink bleach. Trump was only being "sarcastic" when he said it might or might not be a good idea. Don't inject it either, or wash your hands in bleach.
But wear the mask, even though your god Trump doesn't. And no you are not fighting for liberty as your god Trump says when you stand in groups, close together, not wearing masks.
4/24 data
A good day at the virus wars.
7 day averages:
World: -1%
US: -1%
That's the first time the US has not been materially worse than the rest of the world. Good news.
The striking improvement is from shorter time periods.
The Italy/france/spain group had a 3 day average drop of 7%.
The US dropped 10% per day over the last 3 days.
I don't think we've seen drops of that size before. Great news from those hard hit areas. But 3 days is not a big enough sample to say much about.
Esterhazy1 wrote:
agip wrote:
Joe Biden is proving to be a brilliant campaigner.
He underspent Bernie and smoked him.
Now Joe is just playing it cool while he is winning
virtually all the swing states.
And his favorability numbers improve .
Or...a baked potato could beat Trump.
Same difference.
https://twitter.com/mattgrossmann/status/1253823153555603456?s=21Biden's resurgence is about nothing other than the impotence of the primary system for the major party nominations. If the debates were not designed to make a trivial farce of issues, voters would have had a chance to see that Biden has been on the wrong side of history at nearly every turn in his career. But most voters do not know this. Canvassing for likely Democratic voters in seven states in the past three months, I talked to lifelong Democrats who had no idea Elizabeth Warren was a sitting senator, who refused to believe Joe Biden had supported the invasion of Iraq in 2003, who had no idea of how he treated Anita Hill, who had no idea of his support for crime bills that essentially targeted African American neighborhoods. Biden's resurgence is not because some conservative liberals don't really care about progressive issues (though they would never admit it), and because many other voters just do not have easy access to important data. IF ... IF.. the debates were more than sound bite circuses, if the press that the average voter had easy access to presented genuine discussions of issues, candidates like Biden would not even be relevant (and Donald Trump would have long ago been in jail). But we don't have such a system. We have a facile process that discourages working people from an opportunity to access thoughtful discussions of the issues that have grave consequence for their lives. If Biden is elected he will restore the rule of law from the criminal regime of Donald Trump. That will be good. But the wealth gap will continue to expand, and the climate crisis will not be addressed. This is our choice in November--a quick death or a slow death. Not a great choice.
agreed that the 'debate' process is completely awful, reprehensible and rewards the wrong kind of candidate usually. Same with putting IA and NH first. And having caucuses.
Disagree with even hinting at the crazed philosophy of voting for Trump to hasten the revolution. That's some very sophomoric, college dorm garbage. Yeah let's kill millions of people so we can shrink the wealth gap. Great idea.
agip wrote:
Esterhazy1 wrote:
Biden's resurgence is about nothing other than the impotence of the primary system for the major party nominations. If the debates were not designed to make a trivial farce of issues, voters would have had a chance to see that Biden has been on the wrong side of history at nearly every turn in his career. But most voters do not know this. Canvassing for likely Democratic voters in seven states in the past three months, I talked to lifelong Democrats who had no idea Elizabeth Warren was a sitting senator, who refused to believe Joe Biden had supported the invasion of Iraq in 2003, who had no idea of how he treated Anita Hill, who had no idea of his support for crime bills that essentially targeted African American neighborhoods. Biden's resurgence is not because some conservative liberals don't really care about progressive issues (though they would never admit it), and because many other voters just do not have easy access to important data. IF ... IF.. the debates were more than sound bite circuses, if the press that the average voter had easy access to presented genuine discussions of issues, candidates like Biden would not even be relevant (and Donald Trump would have long ago been in jail). But we don't have such a system. We have a facile process that discourages working people from an opportunity to access thoughtful discussions of the issues that have grave consequence for their lives. If Biden is elected he will restore the rule of law from the criminal regime of Donald Trump. That will be good. But the wealth gap will continue to expand, and the climate crisis will not be addressed. This is our choice in November--a quick death or a slow death. Not a great choice.
agreed that the 'debate' process is completely awful, reprehensible and rewards the wrong kind of candidate usually. Same with putting IA and NH first. And having caucuses.
Disagree with even hinting at the crazed philosophy of voting for Trump to hasten the revolution. That's some very sophomoric, college dorm garbage. Yeah let's kill millions of people so we can shrink the wealth gap. Great idea.
I never once said anyone should vote for Trump, not directly, not obliquely. Exhibit A--the neoliberal calumny that will ensure candidates good for your 401K without ever supporting the New Deal America so desperately needs. Go on making up lies about things people and I say. Tell yourself you have made a good point. But just remember every once in a while that you don't actually give a rats ass about the people Biden's policies will never help.
Esterhazy1 wrote:
agip wrote:
agreed that the 'debate' process is completely awful, reprehensible and rewards the wrong kind of candidate usually. Same with putting IA and NH first. And having caucuses.
Disagree with even hinting at the crazed philosophy of voting for Trump to hasten the revolution. That's some very sophomoric, college dorm garbage. Yeah let's kill millions of people so we can shrink the wealth gap. Great idea.
I never once said anyone should vote for Trump, not directly, not obliquely. Exhibit A--the neoliberal calumny that will ensure candidates good for your 401K without ever supporting the New Deal America so desperately needs. Go on making up lies about things people and I say. Tell yourself you have made a good point. But just remember every once in a while that you don't actually give a rats ass about the people Biden's policies will never help.
Glad you aren't of the 'vote trump to hasten the revolution' crowd. Apologies for reading too much into your words.
I care deeply about people struggling. Not sure why you feel I don't. Talk about 'making up lies about things people people and I say.' You are guilty of that as much as I am, clearly.
I admit when I misunderstand someone's argument. Do you?
This is the line that made me think you might be leaning toward a trump vote: "This is our choice in November--a quick death or a slow death. Not a great choice"
I don't really know what it means but it sounds a lot like bernie gals saying 'let's not just postpone the revolution for another 8 years let's get it done now.'
the plague is taking down Pharoah.
Internal GOP polls show our president as likely to lose unless there is a sharp comeback.
This article is full of actual Republicans saying Trump is losing and likely to keep hurting himself with his insane rants and 'I'm the victim' politics.
And the senate is very much in play.
"Republicans were taken aback this past week by the results of a 17-state survey commissioned by the Republican National Committee. It found the president struggling in the Electoral College battlegrounds and likely to lose without signs of an economic rebound this fall, according to a party strategist outside the R.N.C. who is familiar with the poll’s results."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/25/us/politics/trump-election-briefings.html
agip wrote:
4/24 data
A good day at the virus wars.
7 day averages:
World: -1%
US: -1%
That's the first time the US has not been materially worse than the rest of the world. Good news.
The striking improvement is from shorter time periods.
The Italy/france/spain group had a 3 day average drop of 7%.
The US dropped 10% per day over the last 3 days.
I don't think we've seen drops of that size before. Great news from those hard hit areas. But 3 days is not a big enough sample to say much about.
I assume you are looking at deaths here?
Unfortunately, we just hit a record for new daily cases. And it broke the previous record by a lot.
New cases yesterday: 38,958
New cases April 4th: 34,517 (old record)
What I'm afraid of is that much of the older data was driven by New York and the surrounding area.
This new record is only one day of data, but it's the third day in a row that we were over 30,000. We haven't seen three days like that since April 11th. It could mean that now there are more places with large outbreaks and we are going to see New York play out over more and more cities and smaller communities.
If that's the case, we will see 150,000 deaths in the US by the end of May.
Fat hurts wrote:
agip wrote:
4/24 data
A good day at the virus wars.
7 day averages:
World: -1%
US: -1%
That's the first time the US has not been materially worse than the rest of the world. Good news.
The striking improvement is from shorter time periods.
The Italy/france/spain group had a 3 day average drop of 7%.
The US dropped 10% per day over the last 3 days.
I don't think we've seen drops of that size before. Great news from those hard hit areas. But 3 days is not a big enough sample to say much about.
I assume you are looking at deaths here?
Unfortunately, we just hit a record for new daily cases. And it broke the previous record by a lot.
New cases yesterday: 38,958
New cases April 4th: 34,517 (old record)
What I'm afraid of is that much of the older data was driven by New York and the surrounding area.
This new record is only one day of data, but it's the third day in a row that we were over 30,000. We haven't seen three days like that since April 11th. It could mean that now there are more places with large outbreaks and we are going to see New York play out over more and more cities and smaller communities.
If that's the case, we will see 150,000 deaths in the US by the end of May.
Yes, I look only at deaths, not cases.
Understanding cases requires a level of knowledge I don't have.
Because the whole 'case' thing is dependent on the whole 'test' thing and testing is so different everywhere that I can't make heads or tails of it. More tests equals more cases, fewer tests equals fewer cases...I don't know how to hang all that together.
Plus some states report only positives, some report pos and neg. Plus a high level of false tests.
Anyway, for total death predictions the IHME model is generally the most referred to, Right now it predicts 67,641 deaths in the US by August 4.
Which seems very very low to me, but they are the experts.
DRUMPF the Great Orange Dunce!
DRUMPF the Evil Fat Orangutan!
DRUMPF the Blobular Spider-Haired Pvssy Grabber!
A vote for DRUMPF is a vote to burn the country down.