It’s not productive to criticize trump? We’ve seen how “productive” the slave-like devotion of trumpanzees has made him lol.
It’s not productive to criticize trump? We’ve seen how “productive” the slave-like devotion of trumpanzees has made him lol.
Smorbun wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
You will be proven to be not only the biggest liberal dimwit here but also the angriest. You have taken the crown from Tyrone Rexxing. If you want to compare batting averages, nobody and I mean nobody has struck out more than than ?pole.
You are terminally dumb. Dementia Joe will NEVER be POTUS. Get that through that TDS infected head.
You know nothing.
Enjoy your loss.
You call Rigged and me super dumb but we know how to spell "gaffes" correctly. Hint - it is not "gaffs.". Smoburn do they not teach grammar and English at ETT or ITT? Those are not real schools. They want your govt. funding. I will put up my 3.99 GPA at a top-40-in-the-world University against your Podunk degree at Lady-of-the-lake bogus degree any day of the week. Quit with the insults - it makes you look like a simpleton. A sharp person destroys his opponent with a biting wit and humor. Your insults show a man devoid of any weapons. Just bombast. Hope you and family doing well.
I just don’t see the Dow at 30,000 by July, sally. Unless Washington DC shows as much discipline as NYC (unlikely).
Ciro wrote:
agip wrote:
Our idiot president. Magas, hold him accountable.
Sums his stupid followers up to a tee. They are not guided by principles or beliefs, they are spineless jellyfish who shift their stance based on the ramblings of a N.Y. conman.
Correction: He's now officially a FLORIDA conman.
jesseriley wrote:
I just don’t see the Dow at 30,000 by July, sally. Unless Washington DC shows as much discipline as NYC (unlikely).
Perhaps, Jesse, but I have until August. 4 months. The market up to 24,000 thereabouts after a low of about 18,000. Some incredible news about a virus vaccine and the Dow is up to 3,000 in a day. The economy still sucking but once again the market loves certainty. A vaccine will be incredible for the market
CountChocula wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
https://twitter.com/cbouzy/status/1253314996819447814?s=20Do you believe that if Hillary Clinton were president, she would have been able to prevent this job loss?
If Hillary were President, it would be worse, and here is why.
There would be more GOP governors who would refuse to lockdown their states, just because it is Clinton administration's policy.
And there would be far more people who do not obey "stay at home" order, just because Hillary tells them to stay at home.
So the death rate would be much higher. And that cannot be good for the economy. Instead of 26 million, we could be looking at 40-50 million jobs lost.
Trump saved our country from a bigger disaster by beating Hillary.
jesseriley wrote:
It’s not productive to criticize trump? We’ve seen how “productive” the slave-like devotion of trumpanzees has made him lol.
What I mean is that the current situation will not get any better by criticizing actions that were/were not taken in January and February. I don't mean to suggest that criticism should never happen, but I would prefer if everyone devoted their resources and attention to dealing with the situation at hand. Plenty of time for lessons learned, consequences, and criticism later. And trust me, I'll have plenty of criticism.
Sally Vix wrote:
You call Rigged and me super dumb...
^ Spouse abuser
Trump will have plenty of quality time with a magazine and a porn star next year.
Arizona:
RCP Average 10/25 - 4/8 -- -- 48.6 44.2 Biden +4.4
OH Predictive Insights 4/7 - 4/8 600 LV 4.0 52 43 Biden +9
NBC News/Marist 3/10 - 3/15 2523 RV 2.7 47 46 Biden +1
Monmouth 3/11 - 3/14 847 RV 3.4 46 43 Biden +3
Smorbun wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
You’re lost in a delusion of 2016, trigged. Trump’s a one-trick pony. And a dirty trick at that.
Yes. One-trick pony picking Trump to win in 2016. And dirty as you said. Rigged has proven himself to be super dumb. He was certain Democrats would not impeach Trump. He said they were too afraid. He could not have been more wrong.
He's been trying to catch up to Sally as the dumbest poster here, and he's almost there. Sally is the dumbest person I have eve encountered, and Rigged is about 4th. He's been steadily moving up the ladder though.
Sourbuns, you're sinking into ?pole territory. Nothing more deluded than expecting a Dementia Joe victory.
agip wrote:
Trump will have plenty of quality time with a magazine and a porn star next year.
Arizona:
RCP Average 10/25 - 4/8 -- -- 48.6 44.2 Biden +4.4
OH Predictive Insights 4/7 - 4/8 600 LV 4.0 52 43 Biden +9
NBC News/Marist 3/10 - 3/15 2523 RV 2.7 47 46 Biden +1
Monmouth 3/11 - 3/14 847 RV 3.4 46 43 Biden +3
California is headed to bankruptcy because of unfunded pensions, not coronavirus.
New York is headed to bankruptcy because of unfunded pensions, not coronavirus.
Illinois is headed to bankruptcy because of unfunded pensions, not coronavirus.
These Democrat governors are going to hold their citizens hostage until the federal government bails out their bankrupt states and they all want mail in voting too.
That's all this is about now.
semsurrrrrrrr wrote:
https://www.amazon.com/Credible-Evidence-Trump-Raped-13-Year-Old/dp/1797839098https://www.insider.com/jeffrey-epstein-everything-we-know-about-his-relationship-with-trump-2019-7https://www.gq.com/story/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein
Dementia Joe's supporters want to ignore this:
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/23/tara-reade-biden-202785https://www.npr.org/2020/04/19/837966525/on-the-record-a-former-biden-staffers-sexual-assault-allegationCountChocula wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
https://twitter.com/cbouzy/status/1253314996819447814?s=20Do you believe that if Hillary Clinton were president, she would have been able to prevent this job loss?
I believe that HRC would not have told anyone that she was the one driving the markets and economy, and thus would have not been held responsible.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
agip wrote:
Trump will have plenty of quality time with a magazine and a porn star next year.
Arizona:
RCP Average 10/25 - 4/8 -- -- 48.6 44.2 Biden +4.4
OH Predictive Insights 4/7 - 4/8 600 LV 4.0 52 43 Biden +9
NBC News/Marist 3/10 - 3/15 2523 RV 2.7 47 46 Biden +1
Monmouth 3/11 - 3/14 847 RV 3.4 46 43 Biden +3
California is headed to bankruptcy because of unfunded pensions, not coronavirus.
New York is headed to bankruptcy because of unfunded pensions, not coronavirus.
Illinois is headed to bankruptcy because of unfunded pensions, not coronavirus.
These Democrat governors are going to hold their citizens hostage until the federal government bails out their bankrupt states and they all want mail in voting too.
That's all this is about now.
In the next 24 hours, the COVID-19 death toll will be over 50,000. That's 50,000 dead Americans in one month. If we open up, it will be even more in the next month.
It's not about coronavirus at all, is it?
CountChocula wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
Yes. She would have maintained the Pandemic Response Team in the National Security Council and kept up funding to the CDC, insuring that the federal government would have reacted more quickly to the spread of the virus. She would have listened to and accepted the opinions of the medical experts and would have projected to the country the seriousness of this virus. She would have more competently created and carried out a testing program such that the spread of the virus would have been limited.
I could go on and on, but you get the point. Trump didn't cause the virus, but his penny wise pound foolish policies and general arrogance/ignorance made the situation a lot worse than it would have been in the hands of someone who is smarter and more competent (i.e. Hillary).
Do you think she would have encouraged states to order the closure of non-essential businesses, therefore causing the employers to lay off their employees?
I'm not even a Trump supporter, I just think it's a little delusional to hope that a different president would have been able to reduce deaths and also keep businesses open and life as usual. I'm not aware of any other country that has been able to do this.
A faster and smarter reaction to the crisis could have diminished both deaths and economic loss. See South Korea for example - it would have much worse economically had the deaths been greater (more panic, stronger response required, etc..). That this level of economic shut down was required in the US is as a result of the poor planning and slow reaction by the government. Sorry to disappoint you, but this is not delusional.
Trollminator wrote:
CountChocula wrote:
Do you believe that if Hillary Clinton were president, she would have been able to prevent this job loss?
I believe that HRC would not have told anyone that she was the one driving the markets and economy, and thus would have not been held responsible.
HIllary would still have a pandemic office in the WH. She would not have pushed us companies to sell PPE to China into March. She would not have defunded the WHO DURING A PANDEMIC. She would not have lied constantly about everything concerning the drug. She would not have fired a head pandemic guy. She would have been a world leader instead of making the US a sad laughing stock at our ineptitude. At everything.
She would not have spent a trillion dollars on lame giveaways to companies in 2017.
I could go on and on.
Trump's terrible lack of leadership is obvious and deeply punishing to the nation.
And freaking Bill Clinton would not have announced work on a tennis pavilion at the WH during a pandemic.
CountChocula wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
I'm not suggesting that with Hillary, it would have been "life as usual" and businesses would have stayed open. There would have been deaths, and economic pain. But there would have been less. The peak of the pandemic would have been lower and the length of time during which draconian mitigation measures were needed would have been shorter.
Agreed. I guess my gripe is more with the tweet and how it simplifies the issue. And personally I feel that it's not productive for the tweeter to get hung up on the past right now, but that's neither here nor there.
The tweeter is pointing out the hypocrisy IMO. Instead of having done a better job, he sat on his fat behind and let it bubble up before he was forced to act, and then continued to blame everyone and anything else.
p.n. wrote:
Ciro wrote:
Sums his stupid followers up to a tee. They are not guided by principles or beliefs, they are spineless jellyfish who shift their stance based on the ramblings of a N.Y. conman.
Correction: He's now officially a FLORIDA conman.
Good riddance