Did you miss the fact Afghanistan was hosting Bin Laden who at the time was stateless after Saudi Arabia stripped his Saudi citizenship? Afghanistan government which at the time was the Taliban also refused to turn him over to the US. Israel had nothing to do with Afghanistan.
Did you miss the fact Afghanistan was hosting Bin Laden who at the time was stateless after Saudi Arabia stripped his Saudi citizenship? Afghanistan government which at the time was the Taliban also refused to turn him over to the US. Israel had nothing to do with Afghanistan.
What does any of that have to do with the defense of Europe, the reason we are told NATO exists?
Did you miss the fact Afghanistan was hosting Bin Laden who at the time was stateless after Saudi Arabia stripped his Saudi citizenship? Afghanistan government which at the time was the Taliban also refused to turn him over to the US. Israel had nothing to do with Afghanistan.
What does any of that have to do with the defense of Europe, the reason we are told NATO exists?
Are you familiar with "A Clean Break"?
Everyone ought to be
Boy are you dumb. NATO invoked article 5 of its charter after 9/11. NATO had to be involved after one of its members, the US was attacked and Bin Laden and Al Qaeda declared war against the US. That's why NATO was in Afghanistan.
NATO's mission to to advance the security and democratic interests of its members. That doesn't limit action to the North Atlantic. If the members believed that AQ was a threat to them, there is nothing in its charter or mission statement that would preclude action in Afghanistan.
From the NATO website: NATO's purpose is to guarantee the freedom and security of its members through political and military means. POLITICAL - NATO promotes democratic values and enables members to consult and cooperate on defence and security-related issues to solve problems, build trust and, in the long run, prevent conflict.
NATO's mission to to advance the security and democratic interests of its members. That doesn't limit action to the North Atlantic. If the members believed that AQ was a threat to them, there is nothing in its charter or mission statement that would preclude action in Afghanistan.
From the NATO website: NATO's purpose is to guarantee the freedom and security of its members through political and military means. POLITICAL - NATO promotes democratic values and enables members to consult and cooperate on defence and security-related issues to solve problems, build trust and, in the long run, prevent conflict.
🔥 Support Pilot Blog on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/PilotBlog🔥 Donate here: https://donatello.to/DenyDay🔥 Find me on PayPal :aviatorssecretary@gmail....
Do you guys think Kherson will fall before the end of the year? The ukrainians seem to be desparately trying to take it before winter.
Russia media beginning to admit that Russia is not going to hold onto Kherson.
“There won’t be any good news in the next 2 months. Severe territorial losses are likely in these 2 months.”
Meanwhile in Russia: anger and disappointment fill the studio, as the viewers are being prepared for the loss of Kherson and other territories. Host Olga Skabeeva bitterly questions why Russia was so wrong in the beginning, believing that Zelensky would run & NATO wouldn't help. pic.twitter.com/sQpxokXDSv
The idea, philosophies, goals, purposes and naive, wishful thinking of appeasement of brutal thugs and their regimes is same today as it was in the past. Doesn't matter if it's Hitler or Putin, or people like you or Neville Chamberlain. Appeasement is a flawed philosophy in any decade.
You should really study history for at least 20 minutes before you start preaching... you sound like a moron.
Not bank rolling a war is NOT "appeasement".
Here you go, Captain Appeaser. I know your loud fringe hates the guy, but he's properly calling you out for the Moscow Jane types you are. You are NOT conservatives.
"There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists to Putin. There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom."
Israel never fights in these ME wars that are being fought for their benefit.
Their lives matter; nobody elses do
Dumb comment. Israel fought in 1948, 1967 and 1973 wars.
Do you call yourself a U.S. citizen? Posters question my citizenship. U.S. would have been justified under international law to bomb Israel severely after intentional attack on U.S.S. Liberty, 1967. I know what truly unintentional friendly fire looks like, one or two seconds of error is what unintentional friendly fire looks like. Israel's attack on U.S.S. Liberty lasted almost two hours.
Dumb comment. Israel fought in 1948, 1967 and 1973 wars.
Do you call yourself a U.S. citizen? Posters question my citizenship. U.S. would have been justified under international law to bomb Israel severely after intentional attack on U.S.S. Liberty, 1967. I know what truly unintentional friendly fire looks like, one or two seconds of error is what unintentional friendly fire looks like. Israel's attack on U.S.S. Liberty lasted almost two hours.
Someone's watched a crazy YouTube video and thinks they know the history of the world.
Did you miss the fact Afghanistan was hosting Bin Laden who at the time was stateless after Saudi Arabia stripped his Saudi citizenship? Afghanistan government which at the time was the Taliban also refused to turn him over to the US. Israel had nothing to do with Afghanistan.
What does any of that have to do with the defense of Europe, the reason we are told NATO exists?
Are you familiar with "A Clean Break"?
Everyone ought to be
How will Pooty's state media spin this? Hard to put a spin on defeat and retreat?
Do you call yourself a U.S. citizen? Posters question my citizenship. U.S. would have been justified under international law to bomb Israel severely after intentional attack on U.S.S. Liberty, 1967. I know what truly unintentional friendly fire looks like, one or two seconds of error is what unintentional friendly fire looks like. Israel's attack on U.S.S. Liberty lasted almost two hours.
Someone's watched a crazy YouTube video and thinks they know the history of the world.
What kind of traitor supports the murder or dozens of American sailors by foreign nation?
The discussions revealed that some participants feared the US strategy could doom China's ambitions to accelerate the development and production of advanced chips.
Here you go, Captain Appeaser. I know your loud fringe hates the guy, but he's properly calling you out for the Moscow Jane types you are. You are NOT conservatives.
"There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists to Putin. There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom."
Hate to break it you dude, but Pence is the "fringe" of the Right. He might as well do a reverse Tulsi Gabbard and just become a member of the Democrat party, the openly domestic enemies of everything good, sane, and American.
You should really study history for at least 20 minutes before you start preaching... you sound like a moron.
Not bank rolling a war is NOT "appeasement".
Here you go, Captain Appeaser. I know your loud fringe hates the guy, but he's properly calling you out for the Moscow Jane types you are. You are NOT conservatives.
"There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists to Putin. There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom."
Here you go, Captain Appeaser. I know your loud fringe hates the guy, but he's properly calling you out for the Moscow Jane types you are. You are NOT conservatives.
"There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists to Putin. There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom."
Why aren't we paying billions to fight for freedom in Africa? There's many more people suffering under tyrants there than in Ukraine.
We are. The US spends close to $2B per year on African defense, and has for many years. Are you suggesting we should increase our defense spending in Africa?
Perhaps because those seeking military support for African nations are wasting their time pushing for this political action in a running site chat room.
Whether Washington has you feeling impotent or energized, now's the time to start getting more politically active. Here are ways you can elevate your activism.
You are really stating three things: 1) You support Israel attacking U.S. Liberty; 2) You believe Israel was justified attacking U.S.S. Liberty; 3) You are more loyal to Israel than you are to U.S.
Anyone who thinks like you and supports you on this thread are traitors. You got a lot of up arrows. Many traitors on this thread. Traitors to U.S. have been exposed. Not once did you deny Israel attacked U.S.S. Liberty. Deno was a U.S. Sailor during that era. I would be surprised if you have not lost Deno's support now.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
