SeattleSilver wrote:
You didn't mention the bridge until the post that responded to mine. And my post was after your numerous posts complaining about the potential of NATO missiles.
Why pretend that the United States attacked the wrong country? You know that AQ was headquartered in Afghanistan at the time. The origin of the people they used wasn't relevant to taking out AQ and its leaders.
And your Kerch comparison fails because it occurred during a war instigated by Russia. Of course that would result in retaliation. Russia had troops in Ukraine killing, raping and kidnapping Ukrainians, as well as destroying infrastructure, and the Russians are shocked and offended when some of their infrastructure is hit?
I will not argue about your perception of my post. I know what I wrote in response of what.
Someone argued here that Ukraine didn't explode the Kerch bridge, since the terrorists were not Ukrainian citizens. So I bring up an example of 9/11 where terrorists were Saudi and Egyptian, yet 200.000 Afghani got slaughtered for that.
War was instigated by Ukraine in 2014 by commiting a genocide of ethnic Russians in Donbas after the US helped to overthrow a legitimate president of Ukraine and install a Western puppet. This was long before you cared about Ukraine :)
