Trollminator wrote:
nonequals wrote:
Not sure what your point is regarding #2? Taliban patience, if they could have been kept at bay, would be irrelevant (you assume that they couldn't have been held at bay indefinitely; I don't know for certain that that's true; they were for 20 years...surely longer than they would have liked). Anyway, we wouldn't care that they were there, per se, as long as they didn't get strong enough to overwhelm the govt. or sufficiently interfere with our CT ops. The big question, of course, is how many of our troops - and not mentioned previously, billions in equipment/supplies to the ANSF - would have been necessary to maintain the status quo indefinitely? Perhaps it was "too many" troops and/or too much money and/or too high of estimated U.S. casualties. I simply don't know what the estimates in these regards might have been. I hope that I find out one day.
Regarding #3, I think that you're giving the intel too much credit. It appears that it happened considerably faster than the U.S. thought it would. Regarding Biden's level of culpability, on the one hand, there's only so much he can do with bad intel (speed of Taliban takeover after announcing departure). On the OTHER hand, he surely could have said, "We WILL do this in a way that absolutely minimizes the risk to Americans and maximizes the number of Afghan translators and such who we get out of the country." The former was almost certainly stipulated (and probably didn't need to be), but it certainly appears that the latter was not.
It's pretty simple, nothing we could do was going to prevent the Taliban from taking full control. After 20 years and $1T, they came out even stronger. Everyone is worked up right now and dying to find the easiest scapegoat (Biden), but the cold hard truth is there was no "soft" way to get us out. Hopefully, we will get all US citizens/residents out unharmed, in addition to any Visa holders. To the extent we lose any of those lives, that is on Biden.
No, it's not that simple. You simply asserting that non-specific fact - "inevitable" Taliban takeover in an unspecified amount of time - is insufficient. There is some level of U.S. forces and material aid to the ANSF that could have indefinitely stopped the Taliban from substantially interfering with our CT operations in and from AFG. The question is what those levels were? And whatever they were, were we willing to pay them? We know the last 2 POTUS' answers to the second question, but I haven't seen the answer to the first.