There's a very high likelihood that you would run away if Russia invaded the US.
There is a very high likelihood that you would run away if Russian invaded the US. You are a ponk.
A majority of Democrats admitted they would run in a survey. The majority of the rest would find out they were cowards too as soon as the shooting started.
Then quit voting for Democrats, you weirdo.
Hypo wrote:
You say all Russians are evil and now you're saying any Russian that won't participate is a coward.
Cowards are miserable. Russians are miserable cowards. You are a miserable coward. Therefore, you are Russian.
Other people fighting in wars doesn't make you brave little fella.
You've been manipulated by the internet into believing that cheap garbage is an actual response. Think more, think harder, analyze your thoughts more.
The Russian media pushes a narrative. The western media pushes a narrative.
This is reality whether you're clever enough to understand it or not.
Western media consists of a vast multitude of independent media companies, large and small, and many freelance journalists, from many different western nations. Russian media is literally state controlled media. They are obviously not the same. Most people are clever enough to understand that.
You, on the other hand. For you to equate western media with Russian media shows that either you cannot logically discern the obvious differences, or that you are being disingenuous.
The Russian media pushes a narrative. The western media pushes a narrative.
This is reality whether you're clever enough to understand it or not.
Western media consists of a vast multitude of independent media companies, large and small, and many freelance journalists, from many different western nations. Russian media is literally state controlled media. They are obviously not the same. Most people are clever enough to understand that.
You, on the other hand. For you to equate western media with Russian media shows that either you cannot logically discern the obvious differences, or that you are being disingenuous.
I didn't equate them I simply stated the reality that the media pushes a narrative.
The kid was baffled that Russians could be for the war or anti-Ukrainian. Russians are bombarded with propaganda daily.
Thinking western media is propaganda free is hopelessly naive.
It isn't as shamelessly biased as the Russian media but it's still heavily biased.
Western media consists of a vast multitude of independent media companies, large and small, and many freelance journalists, from many different western nations. Russian media is literally state controlled media. They are obviously not the same. Most people are clever enough to understand that.
You, on the other hand. For you to equate western media with Russian media shows that either you cannot logically discern the obvious differences, or that you are being disingenuous.
I didn't equate them I simply stated the reality that the media pushes a narrative.
The kid was baffled that Russians could be for the war or anti-Ukrainian. Russians are bombarded with propaganda daily.
Thinking western media is propaganda free is hopelessly naive.
It isn't as shamelessly biased as the Russian media but it's still heavily biased.
You are implying that it's propaganda vs. propaganda. That's equating the the 2. But they are clearly not the same as we have many different sources in the West. Bias exists in the media, but we have competing sources with different biases. They only have state controlled propaganda.
I didn't equate them I simply stated the reality that the media pushes a narrative.
The kid was baffled that Russians could be for the war or anti-Ukrainian. Russians are bombarded with propaganda daily.
Thinking western media is propaganda free is hopelessly naive.
It isn't as shamelessly biased as the Russian media but it's still heavily biased.
You are implying that it's propaganda vs. propaganda. That's equating the the 2. But they are clearly not the same as we have many different sources in the West. Bias exists in the media, but we have competing sources with different biases. They only have state controlled propaganda.
That's naive.
Hard to believe in 2022 anyone does not realize our media is totally state propaganda
I didn't equate them I simply stated the reality that the media pushes a narrative.
The kid was baffled that Russians could be for the war or anti-Ukrainian. Russians are bombarded with propaganda daily.
Thinking western media is propaganda free is hopelessly naive.
It isn't as shamelessly biased as the Russian media but it's still heavily biased.
You are implying that it's propaganda vs. propaganda. That's equating the the 2. But they are clearly not the same as we have many different sources in the West. Bias exists in the media, but we have competing sources with different biases. They only have state controlled propaganda.
99% of the media in the US is from the left with many outlets openly working for the Democrats.
When a Democrat is in office that 99% effectively becomes state controlled propaganda.
You are implying that it's propaganda vs. propaganda. That's equating the the 2. But they are clearly not the same as we have many different sources in the West. Bias exists in the media, but we have competing sources with different biases. They only have state controlled propaganda.
99% of the media in the US is from the left with many outlets openly working for the Democrats.
When a Democrat is in office that 99% effectively becomes state controlled propaganda.
The majority of traditional media does have a left bias, but that is irrelevant in comparing western media with Russian media, which is what this discussion was about. Having biases and being controlled by the state are different things. In the US, our laws guarantee a free press. Russian laws prohibit a free press.
Even with biased media in the US, the facts come out because we have so many sources. Take Benghazi for example. Administration officials put out that erroneous story about it being a protest that turned violent. The media reported on what the State Dept said, but also investigated and the truth came out quickly that it was actually a planned coordinated attack and the administration had made up the story to try to cover up their failings. The media also reported on the Clinton+Lewinsky scandal. Those are just two examples to help demonstrate that US media is not state propaganda as you claim, even during Democrat administrations.
99% of the media in the US is from the left with many outlets openly working for the Democrats.
When a Democrat is in office that 99% effectively becomes state controlled propaganda.
The majority of traditional media does have a left bias, but that is irrelevant in comparing western media with Russian media, which is what this discussion was about. Having biases and being controlled by the state are different things. In the US, our laws guarantee a free press. Russian laws prohibit a free press.
Even with biased media in the US, the facts come out because we have so many sources. Take Benghazi for example. Administration officials put out that erroneous story about it being a protest that turned violent. The media reported on what the State Dept said, but also investigated and the truth came out quickly that it was actually a planned coordinated attack and the administration had made up the story to try to cover up their failings. The media also reported on the Clinton+Lewinsky scandal. Those are just two examples to help demonstrate that US media is not state propaganda as you claim, even during Democrat administrations.
When the media uses the exact same talking points as the administration it's not irrelevant.
When the media actively works to influence elections it's not irrelevant.
The media ran with the State Department lies about Benghazi until enough facts came out to make the position untenable.
Comparing the media in the 90s to the media today is absurd.
The Hunter Biden laptop story was killed by the entire left wing media. The FBI instructed social media not to run the story. It is silly to try to argue that the media isn't a wing of the Democrat party.
You are implying that it's propaganda vs. propaganda. That's equating the the 2. But they are clearly not the same as we have many different sources in the West. Bias exists in the media, but we have competing sources with different biases. They only have state controlled propaganda.
99% of the media in the US is from the left with many outlets openly working for the Democrats.
When a Democrat is in office that 99% effectively becomes state controlled propaganda.
Fox News (definitely not from the left) is the most watched cable news network, with more viewers than the next two most watched networks combined (MSNBC and CNN).
Joe Rogan and Ben Shapiro (neither of which are on the left) have 2 of the ten most popular podcasts (while the balance are mostly true crime podcasts). And this doesn't include morons like Jimmy Dore and Clayton Morris, who are popular with the low IQ crowd.
While cable news and podcasts are not the only forms of media that people consume, your claim of 99% of the media in the US from the left is demonstrably false.
99% of the media in the US is from the left with many outlets openly working for the Democrats.
When a Democrat is in office that 99% effectively becomes state controlled propaganda.
The majority of traditional media does have a left bias ...
Based on viewer count the "left bias" claim is false. A lot of small "leftish" media vs. a few large "rightish" media. Large wins. ... From the link below.
— In looking at individual news providers, Pew found Democrats and Republicans relied on different sources for political information. Republicans went to Fox News (36%) followed by talk radio (17%) more than any other news source. The remaining news providers were all under 10%. On the other hand, Democrats went to several news providers; CNN was used most often (39%), followed by NPR (24%), MSNBC (22%), The New York Times NYT (21%) and The Washington Post (14%).
— Nearly half (44%) of Republicans who only consumed news from like-minded political sources were age 65 or older and 79% were age 50+. Conversely, only 4% were adults 18-to-29. Among Democrats, 20% of respondents who consistently consumed news from like-minded political content were age 65 or older. Less than half (40%) were age 50 or older and another 20% were between the ages of 18-to-29.
What the above tells you is that many older Republicans are single minded and congregate at few news source sites. Older Democrats use multiple news sources and are not consumed by Fox-like eco-chambers.
A Pew Research survey found the news diet for Republicans and Democrats varied greatly in 2020, the one common source was the broadcast television news.
99% of the media in the US is from the left with many outlets openly working for the Democrats.
When a Democrat is in office that 99% effectively becomes state controlled propaganda.
Fox News (definitely not from the left) is the most watched cable news network, with more viewers than the next two most watched networks combined (MSNBC and CNN).
Joe Rogan and Ben Shapiro (neither of which are on the left) have 2 of the ten most popular podcasts (while the balance are mostly true crime podcasts). And this doesn't include morons like Jimmy Dore and Clayton Morris, who are popular with the low IQ crowd.
While cable news and podcasts are not the only forms of media that people consume, your claim of 99% of the media in the US from the left is demonstrably false.
Jesus Christ...
Fox only has less than 3 million viewers.
ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, Facebook, Twitter, Tik Tok, and YouTube are all very left leaning.
Podcasts which deviate from the norm are popular because you can't get that content anywhere else in media.
And JRE is generally apolitical. Not to mention Rogan is a left leaning libertarian and he's not even remotely right wing.
The majority of traditional media does have a left bias ...
Based on viewer count the "left bias" claim is false. A lot of small "leftish" media vs. a few large "rightish" media. Large wins. ... From the link below.
— In looking at individual news providers, Pew found Democrats and Republicans relied on different sources for political information. Republicans went to Fox News (36%) followed by talk radio (17%) more than any other news source. The remaining news providers were all under 10%. On the other hand, Democrats went to several news providers; CNN was used most often (39%), followed by NPR (24%), MSNBC (22%), The New York Times NYT (21%) and The Washington Post (14%).
— Nearly half (44%) of Republicans who only consumed news from like-minded political sources were age 65 or older and 79% were age 50+. Conversely, only 4% were adults 18-to-29. Among Democrats, 20% of respondents who consistently consumed news from like-minded political content were age 65 or older. Less than half (40%) were age 50 or older and another 20% were between the ages of 18-to-29.
What the above tells you is that many older Republicans are single minded and congregate at few news source sites. Older Democrats use multiple news sources and are not consumed by Fox-like eco-chambers.
99% of the media in the US is from the left with many outlets openly working for the Democrats.
When a Democrat is in office that 99% effectively becomes state controlled propaganda.
Fox News (definitely not from the left) is the most watched cable news network, with more viewers than the next two most watched networks combined (MSNBC and CNN).
Joe Rogan and Ben Shapiro (neither of which are on the left) have 2 of the ten most popular podcasts (while the balance are mostly true crime podcasts). And this doesn't include morons like Jimmy Dore and Clayton Morris, who are popular with the low IQ crowd.
While cable news and podcasts are not the only forms of media that people consume, your claim of 99% of the media in the US from the left is demonstrably false.
Fox is now more Left than the CNns and MSNBCs of the world.
Not as pro war.
Not pro censorship.
Not pro lockdowns and vaccine mandates.
Will question the official state narrative, not just parrot it.
Which is why you, Child-TrollInTheRoom, only post links to your eco-chamber sources, including the Putin operated "troll content to post" "news" feed you watch all day long.
Do trolls like you ever sleep? More likely there are Putin trolls using the same LRC registered name.
Unfortunately, Ukraine’s forces are now only about 70% of what they were last February. Soon, all these weapons the US sends over are going to have to come with soldiers, too. LOL
Fox is now more Left than the CNns and MSNBCs of the world.
All traditional left wing values
Today on Fox & Friends: Fox talking heads spent SIX minutes praising Saudi Arabia jacking up gasoline prices.
Jacked up gasoline prices are now traditional goober-right-wing values. Fox News has confirmed. Please defend Saudi, which by the way, also supporters and defends criminal war-monger, Putin.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
