People under federal criminal investigation for the murder of Renee Good: -Renee Good's wife -The Mayor of Minneapolis -The Governor of Minnesota People not under federal investigation: -The motherfu&$er who shot and killed her
13
0
Speaking for the citizens of the United States of America
People under federal criminal investigation for the murder of Renee Good: -Renee Good's wife -The Mayor of Minneapolis -The Governor of Minnesota People not under federal investigation: -The motherfu&$er who shot and killed her
Instead of changing their policies the Democrats changed America’s demographics.
Democrat policies were so unpopular with the American voters they imported foreign voters and bribed them with benefits paid for the American voters that will no longer vote for them.
MAGA is better at being obedient, so I'm seeking advice on how I can improve my compliance level. Specifically, my questions relate to carrying around proof of citizenship at all times, as specified recently by the Department of Homeland Security. Here is what I want to know:
1. Is my driver's license sufficient, or should I include my birth certificate too?
2. Is it better to use a lanyard for these documents, or is okay to carry them in my pockets?
3. How many times a day should I expect to be stopped and asked to prove my citizenship?
4. Where should I put my documents when I swim?
5. Are Libertarians okay with this?
6. What kind of detention facility should I expect to be sent to if I forget my paperwork or say the wrong thing?
The video clearly shows them turned left. That isn’t up for debate. You are making a choice to lie. Beyond that, you’re proving your bias. You’re holding someone accountable to make a decision frame by frame in slow motion. You’re arguing between aggressively headed towards the left or aggressively heading straight at a federal agent with a vehicle. What a luxury of choices you’ve provided.
It is up for debate. The wheels were turned right (away from the agent) because she was about to leave. Look at all videos again, please.
You are not watching the video or are intentionally lying. When her wheels spin from aggressively hitting the accelerator they are pointed left. It’s not up for debate. It’s a clear as day. You are willfully misrepresenting the abject truth.
Letsrun is full of fascist pigs who like and do double speak all day long. Of course this behavior is condoned if not sanctioned by those who run this place.
At best the shooter is liable for negligent/reckless homicide. At worst it's murder. The multi-angle tapes demonstrate that he was standing back a couple of feet from the car as it turned right, and that he was leaning into the car. But you idiots refuse to see that. You All (including aforementioned others here who shall not be named; you know who you are!) are incredibly sad and pathetic.
MAGA is better at being obedient, so I'm seeking advice on how I can improve my compliance level. Specifically, my questions relate to carrying around proof of citizenship at all times, as specified recently by the Department of Homeland Security. Here is what I want to know:
1. Is my driver's license sufficient, or should I include my birth certificate too?
2. Is it better to use a lanyard for these documents, or is okay to carry them in my pockets?
3. How many times a day should I expect to be stopped and asked to prove my citizenship?
4. Where should I put my documents when I swim?
5. Are Libertarians okay with this?
6. What kind of detention facility should I expect to be sent to if I forget my paperwork or say the wrong thing?
Letsrun is full of fascist pigs who like and do double speak all day long. Of course this behavior is condoned if not sanctioned by those who run this place.
At best the shooter is liable for negligent/reckless homicide. At worst it's murder. The multi-angle tapes demonstrate that he was standing back a couple of feet from the car as it turned right, and that he was leaning into the car. But you idiots refuse to see that. You All (including aforementioned others here who shall not be named; you know who you are!) are incredibly sad and pathetic.
You’re actually contending that when she first attempted to move forward her wheels were turned right? And you’re calling others sad and pathetic. Take a deep breath and rewatch the footage of when she initially attempted to accelerate forward when the wheels spin. Then get back on who is being dishonest. You can argue lots of things surrounding this unfortunate incident. Almost every other thing surrounding this incident. However the very clear video footage of her tires spinning when she starts to accelerate is not one of them. Good grief. Some people will convince themselves of anything to make sure their team is right. That is sad and pathetic.
Letsrun is full of fascist pigs who like and do double speak all day long. Of course this behavior is condoned if not sanctioned by those who run this place.
At best the shooter is liable for negligent/reckless homicide. At worst it's murder. The multi-angle tapes demonstrate that he was standing back a couple of feet from the car as it turned right, and that he was leaning into the car. But you idiots refuse to see that. You All (including aforementioned others here who shall not be named; you know who you are!) are incredibly sad and pathetic.
You’re actually contending that when she first attempted to move forward her wheels were turned right? And you’re calling others sad and pathetic. Take a deep breath and rewatch the footage of when she initially attempted to accelerate forward when the wheels spin. Then get back on who is being dishonest. You can argue lots of things surrounding this unfortunate incident. Almost every other thing surrounding this incident. However the very clear video footage of her tires spinning when she starts to accelerate is not one of them. Good grief. Some people will convince themselves of anything to make sure their team is right. That is sad and pathetic.
Who cares which way they were pointed? All that matters is she violently struck the agent with her car and because of that it was a a justified shooting....Period
This post was edited 39 seconds after it was posted.
People under federal criminal investigation for the murder of Renee Good: -Renee Good's wife -The Mayor of Minneapolis -The Governor of Minnesota People not under federal investigation: -The motherfu&$er who shot and killed her
Letsrun is full of fascist pigs who like and do double speak all day long. Of course this behavior is condoned if not sanctioned by those who run this place.
At best the shooter is liable for negligent/reckless homicide. At worst it's murder. The multi-angle tapes demonstrate that he was standing back a couple of feet from the car as it turned right, and that he was leaning into the car. But you idiots refuse to see that. You All (including aforementioned others here who shall not be named; you know who you are!) are incredibly sad and pathetic.
You’re actually contending that when she first attempted to move forward her wheels were turned right? And you’re calling others sad and pathetic. Take a deep breath and rewatch the footage of when she initially attempted to accelerate forward when the wheels spin. Then get back on who is being dishonest. You can argue lots of things surrounding this unfortunate incident. Almost every other thing surrounding this incident. However the very clear video footage of her tires spinning when she starts to accelerate is not one of them. Good grief. Some people will convince themselves of anything to make sure their team is right. That is sad and pathetic.
Roughly straight for at least the first two of the 3 or 4 frames of the slipping, and probably clearly right by frames 3 and/or 4. Total slippage looks to be 3 or 4 frames and less than one-quarter of a wheel rotation. In other words, the vehicle would have moved farther forward in a straight direction very little if there wasn’t any slippage.
Modify above a little bit in either direction, and what do you have? A jury who could be a tiny bit more or a tiny bit less disappointed with her driving precision (ie, EXACTLY when she went on the gas while she was cranking right). Since the shooter absolutely couldn’t perceive any of that, it would play no role in judging his behavior.
What the jury WOULD know: How the car actually moved, whether or not it might have made any contact with him, and what his phone saw of her clearly cranking the wheel to the right. He would then claim that he didn’t see that, and they could decide whether or not to believe him. And whether they did, or not, whether they think that his first shot was justified.
And then they would decide what they think of shots 2-3 (and 4?), when she 100% for sure not a danger to him?
You’re actually contending that when she first attempted to move forward her wheels were turned right? And you’re calling others sad and pathetic. Take a deep breath and rewatch the footage of when she initially attempted to accelerate forward when the wheels spin. Then get back on who is being dishonest. You can argue lots of things surrounding this unfortunate incident. Almost every other thing surrounding this incident. However the very clear video footage of her tires spinning when she starts to accelerate is not one of them. Good grief. Some people will convince themselves of anything to make sure their team is right. That is sad and pathetic.
Roughly straight for at least the first two of the 3 or 4 frames of the slipping, and probably clearly right by frames 3 and/or 4. Total slippage looks to be 3 or 4 frames and less than one-quarter of a wheel rotation. In other words, the vehicle would have moved farther forward in a straight direction very little if there wasn’t any slippage.
Modify above a little bit in either direction, and what do you have? A jury who could be a tiny bit more or a tiny bit less disappointed with her driving precision (ie, EXACTLY when she went on the gas while she was cranking right). Since the shooter absolutely couldn’t perceive any of that, it would play no role in judging his behavior.
What the jury WOULD know: How the car actually moved, whether or not it might have made any contact with him, and what his phone saw of her clearly cranking the wheel to the right. He would then claim that he didn’t see that, and they could decide whether or not to believe him. And whether they did, or not, whether they think that his first shot was justified.
And then they would decide what they think of shots 2-3 (and 4?), when she 100% for sure not a danger to him?
BTW, I didn’t reiterate how much of an a**hole you are in the previous post, because apparently my previous accurate description of your character was deleted.
I’m a careful, honest person, and you’re still a POS.
Roughly straight for at least the first two of the 3 or 4 frames of the slipping, and probably clearly right by frames 3 and/or 4. Total slippage looks to be 3 or 4 frames and less than one-quarter of a wheel rotation. In other words, the vehicle would have moved farther forward in a straight direction very little if there wasn’t any slippage.
Modify above a little bit in either direction, and what do you have? A jury who could be a tiny bit more or a tiny bit less disappointed with her driving precision (ie, EXACTLY when she went on the gas while she was cranking right). Since the shooter absolutely couldn’t perceive any of that, it would play no role in judging his behavior.
What the jury WOULD know: How the car actually moved, whether or not it might have made any contact with him, and what his phone saw of her clearly cranking the wheel to the right. He would then claim that he didn’t see that, and they could decide whether or not to believe him. And whether they did, or not, whether they think that his first shot was justified.
And then they would decide what they think of shots 2-3 (and 4?), when she 100% for sure not a danger to him?
BTW, I didn’t reiterate how much of an a**hole you are in the previous post, because apparently my previous accurate description of your character was deleted.
I’m a careful, honest person, and you’re still a POS.
Yet here you are still lying, and resorting to personal attacks for no reason. That says more about you than me. When one resorts to angry name calling they’ve exhausted all semblance of a rational conversation. The video footage is clear. I’d take another look.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.