I don't care one way or the other, and Bush is certainly a better runner than Obama, and man it's hard to get past bowling a 37, but Obama would destroy Bush in basketball. Not sure Obama is athletic in any other way, but he can play some hoops. I mean, at least be factual here brother.
Nonsense wrote:
People are so desperate to pass Obama off as some kind of excellent athlete (is it racist?). In '09 I saw a magazine cover with him that read "Jock in chief". There was the shirtless photo. People talk about his weekly basketball game. Then this "running" thing. Nonsense. Where was all this when Bush was in office? Secret Service agents STRUGGLED to keep up with W on his morning runs. He threw a strike to home plate (BTW - for comparison's sake:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcSIwBWiPoU). And if he ever went bowling, he DAMN sure didn't bowl a bloody 37, I'm sure of that.
Please, liberals. It's so sad to watch you fawn over Obama. You want to have a discussion about policy? Fine. I'm sure you'd make some excellent points. But for heaven's sake, your boy is no athlete. Bush would beat him in ANY athletic endeavor... Except maybe golf - Obama's had way more practice at that ;)