will wrote:
Actually, I didn't feel like researching that much. I am not as dense or obvlious to your point as you are trying to make me. However, can you admit that, in spite of your nit picking, there is actual evidence--based on facts and statistics--that Rupp is not likely to do what was claimed in the original thread? It may not be 12:50. Let's push it back to 13:00, since, in realty, that is a valid number. In that case, he is still 6 or 7 seconds shy of the top 6. Why is this so hard to swallow?
Now you're moving the goalposts. Sub-12:50 is much, much different than sub-13. I would have happily agreed with you that in most years, a sub-13 PR is usually necessary to "reach" the top six (with some notable exceptions, such as Tegenkamp's 4th place). However, that's not what you said. You said sub-12:50. Do you understand the difference?