RE: Sarah Palin

Wendell Gee wrote:

NObama........................ wrote:

First off thanks for waiting hand and foot again for me! I knew you'd be here like a little peasant in line for slop. Secondly, I didn't ask you to prove anything. You're the one asking for me to prove something thus your "I'm still waiting" lines that you've littered this thread with.

But continue to bathe in your golden shower of ignorance!

Good work!

Insults, sexual references but still no evidence. You are playing the GOP role so well! That's the NObama we've come to expect.

Still waiting ... you could stop this so easily if you just had the info.

Oh wendell, ignore that racist, ignorant piece of shit, NObama.

He likes Palin because she is extremely ordinary, just like him. It gives him dreams that he too could become famous while still having a low IQ, a crappy degree, and no special abilities.

That pig Palin couldn't even stand the 'heat' of the Alaska! She had to quit a 2-bit governorship so she could spend her time on Oprah pimping her book. That sounds like a REAL serious politician to me!

Wierd Huckster wrote:

Huckabee is an country boy quere.

Palin can be CEO of Princess Cruises or the Tournament of Roses but POTUS ?

Can you imagine Palin facing down confirmed/confessed mass murdering pigs like Hu Jintao, Benjamin Netanyahu, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Kim Jong Il, Ehud Olmert, Robert Mugabe, Hamid Karzai, George W. Bush, Vladimir Putin, Robert Gates, Hassan Nasrallah, Stanley McCrystal, Dmitry Mendeleev, etc.

So you've got General McChrystal and Gates as "mass murdering pigs" , but your savior, Obama gets a pass? Exactly how does that one work? Do you idiots even know how foolish you look and sound. Things have shifted, yet you don't see it. You're template is broken;the nonsense doesn't fly anymore. Please keep it going though, as more of this ridiculousness (from your elected leaders especially) will lead to their being swept out soon. Please, yell it from the rooftops!

bottom line, is that plin represents a very small minority of what you'd collectivly call "conservatives". I'm a libertarian with right leaning tendencies, but socially I'm prochoice, have no problem with gay marriage, and I sure do not want the govt and reglion to mix.

if the GOP wants to define a Rep as ONLY the churchy crowd, then they need to be prepared to be the minority party for the forseeable future.

Wierd Huckster wrote:

Can you imagine Palin facing down confirmed/confessed mass murdering pigs like Hu Jintao, Benjamin Netanyahu, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Kim Jong Il, Ehud Olmert, Robert Mugabe, Hamid Karzai, George W. Bush, Vladimir Putin, Robert Gates, Hassan Nasrallah, Stanley McCrystal, Dmitry Mendeleev, etc.

No, but I can imagine her going down on them.

Sorry, couldn't resist.

Funny how recent Gallup polling shows a majority of Americans(37%) identify as "conservative", while the vast minority (20%) as "liberal". "Independents" chime in at 33%. "Churchy"? That's pretty condescending. Leaving that aside, the Republican party is moving back to it's roots of smaller government, individual liberties, free market solutions, and strong nat'l defense. Clearly, as Obama (and his Congressional minions) plow ahead with policies that the country does not support (not one has majority support), his numbers will plummett. Something has shifted, and I can see here in the bluest area of a blue state.The stimulus debacle, growing economic uncertainty, clear confusion over the wars, weakness in foreign policy, the cap and trade nightmare, phony numbers with regard to the "jobs" created, Ft Hood "shout outs". All of this is serving to shine a bright light on what leftist leadership really looks like. Folks ignored alot during the campaign, but they didn't sign up for this. Now the sausage is being made and it's ugly. Obama is in WAY over his head and people see that now. My God...he had little time for McChrystal, but Andy Stern can visit the Oval Office 22 times! Hillary 4! WTF is that? Back last October, when "Joe" got Obama to reveal his "share the wealth" philosophy, the media rallied to protect him. Now, the confidence is such that Stern and others are out there on Msnbc and other venues, openly talking about wealth redistribution, global this and global that. This is how confident they are. You see it on this board as well. Yet, they don't see the shift that's occurring. Things are not the same as they were even one year ago and it has litte to do with "churchy" people and everything to do with "the" people.

OldXCguy wrote:

Brian, first off,you give me way too much credit. I was merely quoting gamecock's well-worded post and agreeing with him. I think out of respect, you should be directing your comments to him.

Secondly, when you pigeonhole a person's belief system, you do so at your own peril. Yes, I am conservative on financial matters and I want less government in my life; but I am pro-choice, I am definitely not a Creationist (I am generally at odds with the religious right), and I am even somewhat sypathetic to some of the left's views on environmental issues. Sounds like there's much on which we agree. So since you hardly know me, if you even know me at all, how can you tell me that my viewpoints come from resentment?

Because you said it just drives you nuts to think that someone, somwhere might think they are smarter than you. This is Palin's ONLY appeal. She is going to teach those pointy heads a lesson.

I want more government in my life, that is, looking out for the public good in opposition to corporate interests. I don't know what people mean when they keep saying they want "government out of their life." Get rid of government in many areas and you will just have Monsanto, Tyson, Kraft, GM, Smithfield, and other corporations making all the rules disguised under the rhetoric of "liberty". I rather like the FDA, the FTSA and other agencies keeping tabs on corporate power. I rather like environmental rules. I mean, how much government is really in your life? How much more government has come into your life since Obama's election? We are no longer a nation of yeoman farmers, I am afraid. Sure, one can go overboard in balancing individual rights and the publc good, but I don't think the US has come close to that line yet. How about debating issues one at a time instead of having a blanket ideology of "government out of my life" trotted out in every circumstance?

If you are at odds with the religious right, better find a new party and a new hero, because Palin and the Republicans have sold themselves lock, stock and barrel.

This is such rhetoric - you know why? Because all you are reciting, just like the cable TV News - is the vocals of the "conservative white party". They are loud - no doubt.

What every cable network doesn't show you is this:

(because it isn't their audience)

views of people under age 35 white and black, hispanic

views of the hispanic population (Obama 70% approval)

views of African- Americans (Obama - 98% approval)

views of all females (Obama 62% approval)

It wasn't the loud mouth say no conservative white males who put Obama in office - look at the stats, it was the hispanics, mexicans, females, blacks, young people who actually went out and voted this time. If you actually looked at true polling details - he was never losing.

So, I dare the White Party to go find their "white man next in line for the nomination" candidate for 2012. They will not win against a Black President with charmisma.

The Dems lost New Jersey and Virginia - why? because one was a white male incumbent, and the other ran another white male - no appeal to young voters or african americans who went to the polls for Obama.

You can listen to all this BS on TV and recite their talking points - but these minorities WILL return to the polls in 2012 and it won't be for Palin, Romney, Huckleberry or Pawletny. mark my words.

unless he's squeezing toilet paper that is Charisma, not Charmisma

Pawlenty more like: NoPlenty

Palin: Lipstick on a Pig.

Keith Stone wrote:

No, but I can imagine her going down on them.

Sorry, couldn't resist.

RIM SHOT!!!

Thanks for your response to my earlier post, you make a lot of sense.

Harvard Law... Harvard Law Review... cough cough.

You might not like the guy but give it a rest. He is not an idiot and if he didn't go political he would be making a boatload in private industry.

What is wrong with you people.

Got some myself wrote:

Exactly. When he speaks he sounds like a bumbling idiot. His view of politics the economy and world affairs is almost childlike.

something I'm sure you are an expert concerning.

Sir Thickbrain of Dunderhead wrote:

I'd like to ask the typical supporter of Sarah Palin if they'd hire her to work for them at any job other than spokesperson or showroom model. If they were honest, the answer would have to be "no."

It seems to me that this is exactly the reason President Obama was elected...

All I know is she has a great pair of legs.

mez wrote:

Leaving that aside, the Republican party is moving back to it's roots of smaller government, individual liberties, free market solutions, and strong nat'l defense.

Do you really believe this? I hope it's true, as I would consider voting GOP if it were, but I'm skeptical. Maybe you wish it were true but GOP primaries and talking (screaming) heads on TV and radio suggest otherwise.

At this point small gov't GOP needs to take back their own party before they worry about taking back the country.

The GOP is pretty selective about what "individual liberties" it's interested in. I've never seen a political party so interested in regulating personal behavior.

I am a conservative, but consider myself an independent. For the most part, I tend to be on the Republican side. I thought Obama was all talk and no substance and believe he wouldn't be a good president. I also believed that McCain wasn't a great candidate, and Palin was simply a stupid ploy to get the women's vote.

I am surprised that Palin has continued to be around. She is trying to be this "real person" but from the bits and pieces I have read, she is distorting the truth just as bad as any "real politician" (see politifact.com today). I think she made a fool of herself in 2008's election and her speaking out may just hurt the Republican party. That may change in the distant future if she can educate herself and somehow gain some experience in national/world politics, but I think right now she is saying too much without enough knowledge. In the medical field it is referred to as "knowing just enough to be dangerous."

I'd do her. So would you.

Once she goes Black she will never go back.

Palin looks famished. I like a healthy full jiggly bubble gum butt. Yes, you know what I want, that big butt Stephanie Hightower.