Are you saying that Tom Haxton, the 2004 NATIONAL CHAMPION for 10,000 meters wouldn't have even been AA in 2003, had it not been for a wet course?
My point is, calling others ignorant doesn't guarantee you know your ass from a hole in the ground.
Your assumptions are poor.[/quote]
My assumptions are not poor. I said the top 25 every year tend to be the 25 best runners, regardless of circumstances. I went on to say there are exceptions such as Haxton in 2003. He was clearly a top 25 type runner, but had a bad meet at Hanover. You should have read my post more than once. Nice try...I applaud the attempt.
"so you are telling me guys like stephen cohen and ryan terlouw didnt have a shot at becoming an AA they were 77 and 80 something last year. cohen had finished 16th th year before so shouldnt he have been in a league of his own. the fact of the matter is that in d3 there are only a handful of people that are in their own league..the others can be beat. d3 isnt balck and white like d1 it has a huge gray area"
I do believe it is black and white for the top 25. Yes, there will be a few minor exceptions each and every year, but for the most part they tend to be the best runners all season long. TerLouw and Cohen (who was not the same runner as he was 2005) were AA potentials, but were beat on an off day. They obviously weren't one of the best 25 in the country last year. They were capable of grabbing one of the last few spots, but didn't. Scott Lasch was 33 last year and he was right behind TerLouw at Regionals and right in front of Cohen. I would say they belonged in that vicinity, but not any higher.