It is totally possible that Princeton's women could win it all next year, being even more dominant then than they are now. I think they'll make the podium this year (3rd or 45th). I am very happy for them. Get well Reilly and Alexa G.
It is totally possible that Princeton's women could win it all next year, being even more dominant then than they are now. I think they'll make the podium this year (3rd or 45th). I am very happy for them. Get well Reilly and Alexa G.
JeffTheChefr wrote:
It is totally possible that Princeton's women could win it all next year, being even more dominant then than they are now. I think they'll make the podium this year (3rd or 45th). I am very happy for them. Get well Reilly and Alexa G.
Agreed, they ran very confidently today, only 2 points off the record low score for the event. Reilly (sans boot) and Alexa were both there and are well on the way to recovery.
On the men's side for non-scholarships, Dartmouth's double #2's are the only runner-up finishes from what I can see on the NCAA page. I'll give props to the alma mater and comment that in 1971 Penn was 3rd, behind Oregon and Villanova - that team still has the all-time lowest Heps score.
Harvard, Yale, Dartmouth and Cornell have finished Top 5 on the women's side.
They might not have athletic scholarships, but they have more financial aid than anyone. They can give out some nice pakages to their athletes, so don't feel sorry for them.
banker wrote:
They can give out some nice pakages to their athletes, so don't feel sorry for them.
Yes, they give out nice financial-aid packagese to *all* their students, based on family need. Athletes get these, just the same as everybody else (i.e. nonathletes like me--a three-quarter ride, all scholarship, never ran a varsity race). Financial aid does *not* discriminate against athletes...
Or was that not what you meant?
"packages"
"nonathletes, like me"
(But yes, I did mean "i.e."--"that is"!)