Smorbun wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
I didn't finish what I was going to say. I disagree strongly with what many of you have to say BUT I don't hurl insults. I will borrow from Flagpole (if he doesn't mind) and say I have 100% integrity 100% of the time.
What are you talking about? You have been called out at least a couple of times on this claim of yours that you don't insult people with posts of yours to prove it. You do it commonly. So, I guess you are a liar in addition to being a dumb*ss.
Huh?
After the Ukrainians finish, sally’s voting for bernie.
She’ll need the free dental!
What do you call a russian who thinks she can stop an impeachment?
An optimist!
Before I left her office I told her "You gotta help. I think I'm a dog!"
The psychiatrist tells me "That's very interesting, why don't you go ahead and lie down on the couch. I responded "I'm not allowed on the couch."
jesseriley wrote:
What do you call a russian who thinks she can stop an impeachment?
An optimist!
My hero Nicholas II was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1901.
And unlike your current boss, he would never hit a woman!
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Contemplating your questions while doing some other stuff at the same time. 5) Is the investigation really perfectly legal and warranted? Why does Adam Schiff refuse to open up the impeachment "inquiry" so that Americans can see the process play out? What is hiding? 4) How has Trump openly harrassed and attacked the whistle blower? If Trump has truly committed impeachable offenses, why does Pelosi not have a House vote and begin IMMEDIATELY impeachment proceedings? Why have it secretly done behind closed doors? Nixon's removal was a bipartisan affair. This is going to be just like Obamacare. Republicans will be kept completely out of the process. It will be 100% Dems. Why not try to make it bipartisan? The American public will view it as a witch hunt unless Repubs are involved in the impeachment.
No, finish answering #1-3 then I’ll respond
Hey Sally - going to finish answering? I might pull a flagpole soon and ban you.
Trollminator wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
No, finish answering #1-3 then I’ll respond
Hey Sally - going to finish answering? I might pull a flagpole soon and ban you.
Why should I finish answering? You called me pathetic. Go ahead and effing ban me. Have a blessed day. I will be weeping in my bed knowing you banned me. How will I ever go on?
Sally Vix wrote:
We need to quit looking into Trump and need to look more closely at Hunter Biden (along with Daddy)
Besides dumping his wife for his brother's widow, he did some really bad things.
He has squandered his family's money on HOOKERS, STRIPPERS AND DRUGS. He and Flagpole would likely call the hookers and strippers WHORES. Alas, the apple does not fall far from the tree.
In other words, LOOK!
https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2017/04/25/istock-115796521_wide-2f8afeb04be5bf8290f13dd1a5a9e107f63ee2fd.jpg?s=1400
Don’t cry, sally, it’s not your fault you’re a failure!
I told Maria Butina the same thing...
Trollminator wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
No, finish answering #1-3 then I’ll respond
Hey Sally - going to finish answering? I might pull a flagpole soon and ban you.
You can forget it. Sally is only interested in cherry picking and flipping lame arguments back. Sally has no integrity. Not sure why Sally gets upset, calling him stupid is actually a complement given his posting history. Watch the response to this - sally is still going to avoid your questions - too busy sucking on the tiny.
jesseriley wrote:
Don’t cry, sally, it’s not your fault you’re a failure!
I told Maria Butina the same thing...
Jesse - I look in the mirror and I think I am good enough , I am smart enough, and dog-gone it - people like me!
Why should anyone bother answering the questions. You and the rest of the die-hard anti-Trump crowd are unwilling to recognize any facts that would dispute your "truth." Rational observers would say that you can't distinguish between what Trump, Biden, & Clinton/Obama have done. Either all or wrong or none are wrong. The political game of propping up one guy over the other and spinning facts to your advantage is extremely distasteful . Some element of intellectual honesty in this debate would be very refreshing.
ok, you can carry on now....
https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/rodney_dangerfield_163142Sally Vix wrote:
I had a visit with my psychiatrist this morning. She told me I was crazy and I told her I I wanted a second opinion. She said okay, you're ugly too. Rough morning!
Sallynator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
We need to quit looking into Trump and need to look more closely at Hunter Biden (along with Daddy)
Besides dumping his wife for his brother's widow, he did some really bad things.
He has squandered his family's money on HOOKERS, STRIPPERS AND DRUGS. He and Flagpole would likely call the hookers and strippers WHORES. Alas, the apple does not fall far from the tree.
Don’t you have any integrity? Why won’t you respond to TroLLys questions like you said you would?
What kind of a question is that?!? Trolls have no integrity.
When the going gets tough, sally, the tough get going...on Aeroflot, baby!
Da truf wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Hey Sally - going to finish answering? I might pull a flagpole soon and ban you.
You can forget it. Sally is only interested in cherry picking and flipping lame arguments back. Sally has no integrity. Not sure why Sally gets upset, calling him stupid is actually a complement given his posting history. Watch the response to this - sally is still going to avoid your questions - too busy sucking on the tiny.
I will take that as a compliment - which you misspelled. When you are criticizing someone, make sure your spelling is correct or you look like a trailer park inhabitant.
Sally lives in a traitor park!
agip wrote:
some even think he is the second whistleblower.
Dems loving Bolton and Rs fearing him is a strange strange world.
Bolton being the 2nd whistleblower I've thought has a fair amount of merit. Trump hasn't gone after #2 with the same gusto as #1 even though Trump, as only he can do, ranted to the point where he basically confirmed what is known about #1's information. I think Trump is afraid of the source for #2.
Bolton is not a guy I like but he would carry a fair amount of credibility with whatever he comes forward with....if he does.
Whats the Point wrote:
Why should anyone bother answering the questions. You and the rest of the die-hard anti-Trump crowd are unwilling to recognize any facts that would dispute your "truth." Rational observers would say that you can't distinguish between what Trump, Biden, & Clinton/Obama have done. Either all or wrong or none are wrong. The political game of propping up one guy over the other and spinning facts to your advantage is extremely distasteful . Some element of intellectual honesty in this debate would be very refreshing.
ok, you can carry on now....
+1 - Not sure I have ever done that before.
