Sally, I'm going to also point to another clear distinction here.. Biden's actions were done through official US policy, totally backed by Congress and our EU partners. He did it in the open. Now you can make the case he was still using his position to somehow protect his son (although there are clear arguments his son did not benefit at all from the prosecutor's removal). So if Biden was committing a crime so openly and clearly, why wouldn't anyone have called him out back then? Why wait almost 6 years until Biden becomes the clear threat to Trump to point the finger? And why not open an official investigation into the matter?
I'll ask you a few questions about the Ukraine/trump issue:
1. What would trump have to gain from Ukraine "do him a favor"?
2. What would Ukraine have to lose if they didn't do him a favor?
3. What would trump and those in his close circle have to lose if they didn't classify the call the way they did?
4. Why would trump openly harass and attack the whistle blower despite clear evidence that he/she filed the complaint properly?
5. Why would trump take the political risk of blocking anyone from giving testimony to a perfectly legal and warranted investigation?
This is pretty basic stuff Sally. I know it's too many questions for you all at once, but I hope you will at least try.