rekrunner wrote:
Are you asking me? That statement doesn't come from me.
You are right that she was never charged, so there can be no report "clearing her of all charges", which I guess also means there is no basis for your only reason you are sure she is suspect.
LordEric44 wrote:
The only reason I am sure Radcliffe is highly suspect , is that she had Seb Coe create a report "clearing her of all charges" . No charges were ever against her . It is really the first time the IAAF did anything for a person to help them in the social media arena.
The Statement " Radcliffe was cleared of being a drugs cheat by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) and UK Anti-Doping, which both said there was no evidence against her. "
What was she charged with , other than people pointing a finger at her ?
No , Her sample was listed as "suspect" on a WADA doping report . 3 values listed as suspicious. After British MP Jesse Norman implicated a "potential London Marathon winner" , it was Radcliffe who's guilt made her speak out . Her name was never mentioned as stated by the Radcliffe camp. Radcliffe declined a chance to have an open/transparent evaluation
of her blood results , but she declined . Instead herself and Coe decided going social media saying tests were done , and she is " cleared of all charges" . There is no proof any test were done, nor are they available for verification.