Down goes the Dow

Klondike5 · 2013-08-27T08:47:20-04:00

Down to 14,850 from a peak of 15,700 I believe. Maybe 5% What's the bottom? I am betting sub 13,000

Non-Running Finance/Jobs

Reply New New Thread

Moderation Moderation Information Moderation Information & Rules

Page 3,259 of 3,560

1 3,258 3,259 3,260 3,560

Next Last

2 years ago 02/16/2024 7:10am EST

re: Stater of the obvious

This was 9 months ago at roughly SPX 4100. Now we're at SPX 5000.

The comments are fun - just complete derision toward anyone who believed the upward momentum of 2023 was sustainable.

Some dude on his lunch break sending out a terrible investment call to 100k people.

Endless Capital
@endless_frank
Ya know what, f... this. Everybody thinks too many people are bearish? I don’t hear anyone saying $SPX is about to nose dive 20-25%. In fact, I hear everyone saying the October lows are thee lows in this cycle.
They aren’t.

The mkt had every chance to melt up the last week & a half into monthly Vix expiry and opex yet it couldn’t do shlt. Other than a Friday squeeze 2 Fridays ago after 4 consecutive down days it flatlined since.
What’s the catalyst for higher prices as flows turn less supportive?

12:37 PM · May 16, 2023
·
100.4K
Views

Ya know what, fuck this. Everybody thinks too many people are bearish? I don’t hear anyone saying $SPX is about to nose dive 20-25%. In fact, I hear everyone saying the October lows are thee lows in this cycle.

They aren’t.
— Endless Capital (@endless_frank) May 16, 2023

View on X

2 years ago 02/16/2024 11:29am EST

re: comfortably retired

comfortably retired wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
There is no credible combination of mutual funds, with or without individual stocks, that would have performed as well as you've claimed.
Face it FP, nobody in this thread believes your fantastic story.

Don't care.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 11:58am EST

re: seattle prattle

seattle prattle wrote:
comfortably retired wrote:
There is no credible combination of mutual funds, with or without individual stocks, that would have performed as well as you've claimed.
Face it FP, nobody in this thread believes your fantastic story.
That's my take away as well.
It's reasonable to see how a portfolio might beat an index like the DJIA by a very large amount over a long period of time (say 50 years), but it becomes statistically very rare that it would have done so every single year over that timeframe. That is the critical difference here in a nutshell.
Many investors might assume that since they have so resoundingly outperformed the DJIA over the duration of their investing career, it must have done it most every single year along the way. But in fact, the chance that it had is extremely unlikely.
Perhaps FP did such a back-of-the- envelope approximation, but if so, it would be helpful to know, since this is a common occurrence.

You still are mistakenly stuck on some idea that my portfolio was static all those years. That would be INCORRECT! Moved stuff around, added new funds, kept others but cut contributions down, etc. You know, I haven't claimed to have made 20% a year or something like that. My average annual return is just SLIGHLTY better than what the Dow has done since 1989. If I were going to lie, I'd lie BIG (I don't lie...not one time in my adult life).

You people are beyond silly. Seattle, YOU say you have done better than I have. No one is questioning you on that claim, and I couldn't care less if you have. What you have or haven't made doesn't affect my retirement. Anyway, just in case you all thought differently, I find this HILARIOUS that you are so concerned about my portfolio. I am not bothered in the slightest about it, and I hope you all continue to doubt, because I'll just look at my spreadsheet and know that my stuff has done what it has done.

The problem you people have is that you think investing in the stock market is a "who has a bigger d!ck" contest because you assign machismo and intellect to it where none is required. I got very lucky with a few moves, and lucky that the two stocks I was forced to own (well, I could have decided not to accept a match) did well during the time I owned them (and they were then both a decent portion of my portfolio, so they affected the overall performance a decent amount. The ONLY thing I do better than probably more than 99% of investors is that I ALWAYS invest like clockwork and ALWAYS just about as much as I can handle while still having a life...we still invest today because The Lovely Mrs. Flagpole still works. We don't need to invest, but it's just automatically set up and we don't need the extra income, so we continue to invest.

AND, just to recap the last 3 calendar years...I LOST to the Dow by a LOT in 2022. I beat the Dow handily in 2023. I am currently LOSING to the Dow in 2024, but just by a little. Today my stuff is more static than ever before, and because of that, I expect to lose to the Dow much more frequently than before...kind of ironic since I'm a much more educated investor today, but that's how luck works.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 12:30pm EST

re: agip

agip wrote:
This was 9 months ago at roughly SPX 4100. Now we're at SPX 5000.
The comments are fun - just complete derision toward anyone who believed the upward momentum of 2023 was sustainable.
Some dude on his lunch break sending out a terrible investment call to 100k people.
Endless Capital
@endless_frank
Ya know what, f... this. Everybody thinks too many people are bearish? I don’t hear anyone saying $SPX is about to nose dive 20-25%. In fact, I hear everyone saying the October lows are thee lows in this cycle.
They aren’t.
The mkt had every chance to melt up the last week & a half into monthly Vix expiry and opex yet it couldn’t do shlt. Other than a Friday squeeze 2 Fridays ago after 4 consecutive down days it flatlined since.
What’s the catalyst for higher prices as flows turn less supportive?
12:37 PM · May 16, 2023
·
100.4K
Views
Tweet:x.com/endless_frank/status/16585121251...

Agip, plenty of bravado there, for sure.

I always figure that traders shorting the market find it necessary to sow descent and gloom on the market, so as to personally benefit from their short sale positions. It's self serving.

If they can persuade some longs to sell, their short positions gain. I've seen this a ton on investing sites.

Maybe this is an example of this, or not, but it could be.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 12:37pm EST

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
comfortably retired wrote:
There is no credible combination of mutual funds, with or without individual stocks, that would have performed as well as you've claimed.
Face it FP, nobody in this thread believes your fantastic story.
Don't care.

If that were true, you wouldn’t keep doubling down on your claims.

Also, I, for one, am happy to accept that your imaginary d1ck is bigger than mine. This isn’t about besting each other’s claims, this is about poking fun at a know-it-all blowhard.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 1:37pm EST

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
comfortably retired wrote:
There is no credible combination of mutual funds, with or without individual stocks, that would have performed as well as you've claimed.
Face it FP, nobody in this thread believes your fantastic story.
Don't care.

Hilarious ... In response to Comfortably retired saying no one believes his (Flagpole's) fairy tale , Flagpole asserts "I don't care." And in the immediate post after this one Flagpole writes out 4 very long paragraphs showing he cares very deeply. He is cornered and is panicking.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:09pm EST

re: Sally Vix

Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Don't care.
Hilarious ... In response to Comfortably retired saying no one believes his (Flagpole's) fairy tale , Flagpole asserts "I don't care." And in the immediate post after this one Flagpole writes out 4 very long paragraphs showing he cares very deeply. He is cornered and is panicking.

Ha! Nope. Not cornered and not panicking in the slightest. Absolutely HILARIOUS that you think so. Regarding the "long paragraphs," I type well over 100 WPM, so it takes me next to no time to do that. Just one of the many many ways I am better than all of you.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:17pm EST

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Hilarious ... In response to Comfortably retired saying no one believes his (Flagpole's) fairy tale , Flagpole asserts "I don't care." And in the immediate post after this one Flagpole writes out 4 very long paragraphs showing he cares very deeply. He is cornered and is panicking.
Ha! Nope. Not cornered and not panicking in the slightest. Absolutely HILARIOUS that you think so. Regarding the "long paragraphs," I type well over 100 WPM, so it takes me next to no time to do that. Just one of the many many ways I am better than all of you.

Of course you are, Flagpole. Of course.

But have you and your portfolio been better than the DJIA for something like 32 out of the last 34 years?

That's the question troubling us lowly minions.

No offense, of course.

Just asking for those Jones brothers and Charles Bergstresser (you know, the founders of the DJIA).

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:21pm EST

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Hilarious ... In response to Comfortably retired saying no one believes his (Flagpole's) fairy tale , Flagpole asserts "I don't care." And in the immediate post after this one Flagpole writes out 4 very long paragraphs showing he cares very deeply. He is cornered and is panicking.
Ha! Nope. Not cornered and not panicking in the slightest. Absolutely HILARIOUS that you think so. Regarding the "long paragraphs," I type well over 100 WPM, so it takes me next to no time to do that. Just one of the many many ways I am better than all of you.

So ... you have the biggest biceps.

You type faster than everyone else.

You have beaten the market 35 out of 32 years.

You are smarter than everyone else.

Make a list of everything where you are better than everyone else:

1) _______

2) ________

3) _______

... and on and on and on.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:27pm EST

re: Sally Vix

Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Ha! Nope. Not cornered and not panicking in the slightest. Absolutely HILARIOUS that you think so. Regarding the "long paragraphs," I type well over 100 WPM, so it takes me next to no time to do that. Just one of the many many ways I am better than all of you.
So ... you have the biggest biceps.
You type faster than everyone else.
You have beaten the market 35 out of 32 years.
You are smarter than everyone else.
Make a list of everything where you are better than everyone else:
1) biggest narcissist
2) loudest blowhard
3) least knowledgeable know-it-all
4) can’t figure out when to quit while he’s ahead
... and on and on and on.

I’ve been visiting this hell hole since around 2000, give or take, and these are my humble observations.

comfortably retired from the ipad wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Don't care.
If that were true, you wouldn’t keep doubling down on your claims.
Also, I, for one, am happy to accept that your imaginary d1ck is bigger than mine. This isn’t about besting each other’s claims, this is about poking fun at a know-it-all blowhard.

1) No "doubling down." I just care about speaking the truth, but I couldn't care less if you believe the truth or not.

2) You mentioning my d!ck shows that you don't get it. It is NOT about that at all. Investing is ONLY putting money away today that you don't need today so that you have money tomorrow when you no longer have an income. The goal should be to be as diversified as possible and to invest as early in your working life as you can and as heavily as you can into stock-containing mutual funds. There is no machismo there. There is no intellect needed there. There is no needing to be a know-it-all there. It is a rote process and just requires that you do it. Most people don't do it.

3) Regarding me being a blowhard, hardly. I have ALWAYS said that I don't research stocks, that I have picked funds randomly (except for the fact that I pick them in a way to increase diversification) and that I have been lucky over the years with how things have gone (though to be fair, not SUPER lucky as my annual rate of return is just a tad higher than how the Dow has done since 1989). Not something a blowhard would say.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:49pm EST

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
comfortably retired from the ipad wrote:
If that were true, you wouldn’t keep doubling down on your claims.
Also, I, for one, am happy to accept that your imaginary d1ck is bigger than mine. This isn’t about besting each other’s claims, this is about poking fun at a know-it-all blowhard.
1) No "doubling down." I just care about speaking the truth, but I couldn't care less if you believe the truth or not.
2) You mentioning my d!ck shows that you don't get it. It is NOT about that at all. Investing is ONLY putting money away today that you don't need today so that you have money tomorrow when you no longer have an income. The goal should be to be as diversified as possible and to invest as early in your working life as you can and as heavily as you can into stock-containing mutual funds. There is no machismo there. There is no intellect needed there. There is no needing to be a know-it-all there. It is a rote process and just requires that you do it. Most people don't do it.
3) Regarding me being a blowhard, hardly. I have ALWAYS said that I don't research stocks, that I have picked funds randomly (except for the fact that I pick them in a way to increase diversification) and that I have been lucky over the years with how things have gone (though to be fair, not SUPER lucky as my annual rate of return is just a tad higher than how the Dow has done since 1989). Not something a blowhard would say.

FP, 1) (since you love numbering everything) It was you who brought up your dick. Ok, that sounds a little different than I intended, but be that as it may, it was you who first started talking about it. We are just trying to fall into line since you are better than us, as you point out.

2) Your 2nd point is amiss That may be your goal, but it is silly to assume it is everyone's goal. My goal, for example, is to own all the money in the world. ALL OF IT, i say! ALL OF IT! So, my strategy will clearly be different than yours, and no less valid.

3) You have done little to asway the notion that your portfolio is not biased towards tech, which most here feel it must surely be. If it is any kind of growth fund, it almost assuredly is. You have given us little in terms of specifics to back up the statistically incredible claim of being an index an unheard of amount of times. And yes, it is unheard of. Trust us on that.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:49pm EST

re: Sally Vix

Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Ha! Nope. Not cornered and not panicking in the slightest. Absolutely HILARIOUS that you think so. Regarding the "long paragraphs," I type well over 100 WPM, so it takes me next to no time to do that. Just one of the many many ways I am better than all of you.
So ... you have the biggest biceps.
You type faster than everyone else.
You have beaten the market 35 out of 32 years.
You are smarter than everyone else.
Make a list of everything where you are better than everyone else:
1) _______
2) ________
3) _______
... and on and on and on.

1) I have HUGE biceps. I never said anything about being bigger. I would imagine they are since they are HUGE though.

2) I type well over 100 WPM, and I have only known one person who could type as fast as I can. Usually good typers do about 40 WPM, so most aren't anywhere close to as fast as I am.

3) I have NEVER said I have beaten "the market" ever.

4) I am super smart. Just a fact. Smarter than you by far. I've not seen a person on these boards who is smarter than I am. Am I smarter than "everyone?" Of course not. In a world of now over 8 billion people, it is highly likely there are a handful smarter than I am out there.

5) So, what else? Hmm. I'm a better piano player than anyone here...for certain. I'm better at parkour than anyone here. I was a better diver and gymnast in my youth than anyone here. I'm a better bowler than probably anyone here. I'm PROBABLY one of the best if not the best cubers (as in Rubik's) here. I can play guitar and sing better than the vast majority of those here. I can skip rocks better than anyone here for sure. I am like world-class in that arena (not kidding). I honestly should do some competitions there. I'm a better chef than probably anyone here. I know more about manufacturing and manufacturing software than anyone here. I know more about the generic drug industry and biotechnology than anyone here. I know more baseball history/stats than anyone here. I've been to at least as many states in the Continental US as anyone here (I've been to all of them). I'm a better basketball free throw shooter than anyone here. In my youth, I could throw a baseball faster than anyone here. I'm probably forgetting some things.

What CAN'T I do? I can not draw with a damn. I'm no good at woodworking.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:54pm EST

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
So ... you have the biggest biceps.
You type faster than everyone else.
You have beaten the market 35 out of 32 years.
You are smarter than everyone else.
Make a list of everything where you are better than everyone else:
1) _______
2) ________
3) _______
... and on and on and on.
1) I have HUGE biceps. I never said anything about being bigger. I would imagine they are since they are HUGE though.
2) I type well over 100 WPM, and I have only known one person who could type as fast as I can. Usually good typers do about 40 WPM, so most aren't anywhere close to as fast as I am.
3) I have NEVER said I have beaten "the market" ever.
4) I am super smart. Just a fact. Smarter than you by far. I've not seen a person on these boards who is smarter than I am. Am I smarter than "everyone?" Of course not. In a world of now over 8 billion people, it is highly likely there are a handful smarter than I am out there.
5) So, what else? Hmm. I'm a better piano player than anyone here...for certain. I'm better at parkour than anyone here. I was a better diver and gymnast in my youth than anyone here. I'm a better bowler than probably anyone here. I'm PROBABLY one of the best if not the best cubers (as in Rubik's) here. I can play guitar and sing better than the vast majority of those here. I can skip rocks better than anyone here for sure. I am like world-class in that arena (not kidding). I honestly should do some competitions there. I'm a better chef than probably anyone here. I know more about manufacturing and manufacturing software than anyone here. I know more about the generic drug industry and biotechnology than anyone here. I know more baseball history/stats than anyone here. I've been to at least as many states in the Continental US as anyone here (I've been to all of them). I'm a better basketball free throw shooter than anyone here. In my youth, I could throw a baseball faster than anyone here. I'm probably forgetting some things.
What CAN'T I do? I can not draw with a damn. I'm no good at woodworking.

I am pretty sure you are the best nude modeler. And you can make the best pancakes. Mrs. Flagpole can assuredly attest to that. Mrs. Flagpole???

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:56pm EST

re: seattle prattle

seattle prattle wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) No "doubling down." I just care about speaking the truth, but I couldn't care less if you believe the truth or not.
2) You mentioning my d!ck shows that you don't get it. It is NOT about that at all. Investing is ONLY putting money away today that you don't need today so that you have money tomorrow when you no longer have an income. The goal should be to be as diversified as possible and to invest as early in your working life as you can and as heavily as you can into stock-containing mutual funds. There is no machismo there. There is no intellect needed there. There is no needing to be a know-it-all there. It is a rote process and just requires that you do it. Most people don't do it.
3) Regarding me being a blowhard, hardly. I have ALWAYS said that I don't research stocks, that I have picked funds randomly (except for the fact that I pick them in a way to increase diversification) and that I have been lucky over the years with how things have gone (though to be fair, not SUPER lucky as my annual rate of return is just a tad higher than how the Dow has done since 1989). Not something a blowhard would say.
FP, 1) (since you love numbering everything) It was you who brought up your dick. Ok, that sounds a little different than I intended, but be that as it may, it was you who first started talking about it. We are just trying to fall into line since you are better than us, as you point out.
2) Your 2nd point is amiss That may be your goal, but it is silly to assume it is everyone's goal. My goal, for example, is to own all the money in the world. ALL OF IT, i say! ALL OF IT! So, my strategy will clearly be different than yours, and no less valid.
3) You have done little to asway the notion that your portfolio is not biased towards tech, which most here feel it must surely be. If it is any kind of growth fund, it almost assuredly is. You have given us little in terms of specifics to back up the statistically incredible claim of being an index an unheard of amount of times. And yes, it is unheard of. Trust us on that.

1) I brought the d!ck thing by mentioning that investing is NOT about that, and then the fella who responded to me brought it up as if it IS a thing...that's why the two references were VERY different.

2) You will fail in your attempt to have ALL the money. Investing goals need to be realistic.

3) Man, back to the Tech thing. In 2023, I did better than The Dow and worse than the NASDAQ (a decent amount worse than NASDAQ), so I could not have been heavily in tech. I own LOTS of tech of course because it is prudent to and because I own lots of everything, but as a percentage of the whole, it is not tech heavy. In 2023, I wish it were (well, not REALLY as it doesn't matter anymore how my stuff does...got enough...that is MORE than enough).

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:57pm EST

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
So ... you have the biggest biceps.
You type faster than everyone else.
You have beaten the market 35 out of 32 years.
You are smarter than everyone else.
Make a list of everything where you are better than everyone else:
1) _______
2) ________
3) _______
... and on and on and on.
1) I have HUGE biceps. I never said anything about being bigger. I would imagine they are since they are HUGE though.
2) I type well over 100 WPM, and I have only known one person who could type as fast as I can. Usually good typers do about 40 WPM, so most aren't anywhere close to as fast as I am.
3) I have NEVER said I have beaten "the market" ever.
4) I am super smart. Just a fact. Smarter than you by far. I've not seen a person on these boards who is smarter than I am. Am I smarter than "everyone?" Of course not. In a world of now over 8 billion people, it is highly likely there are a handful smarter than I am out there.
5) So, what else? Hmm. I'm a better piano player than anyone here...for certain. I'm better at parkour than anyone here. I was a better diver and gymnast in my youth than anyone here. I'm a better bowler than probably anyone here. I'm PROBABLY one of the best if not the best cubers (as in Rubik's) here. I can play guitar and sing better than the vast majority of those here. I can skip rocks better than anyone here for sure. I am like world-class in that arena (not kidding). I honestly should do some competitions there. I'm a better chef than probably anyone here. I know more about manufacturing and manufacturing software than anyone here. I know more about the generic drug industry and biotechnology than anyone here. I know more baseball history/stats than anyone here. I've been to at least as many states in the Continental US as anyone here (I've been to all of them). I'm a better basketball free throw shooter than anyone here. In my youth, I could throw a baseball faster than anyone here. I'm probably forgetting some things.
What CAN'T I do? I can not draw with a damn. I'm no good at woodworking.

Soooo .... of of the 8 BILLION people on the planet you are claiming to be around the 6th smartest? You are probably smarter than Newton ever was, or Einstein ever was, or Galileo ever was or Leibnitz or anyone else. Flagpole - you are the GREATEST!!! TAKE A BOW!

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:57pm EST

re: Sally Vix

Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) I have HUGE biceps. I never said anything about being bigger. I would imagine they are since they are HUGE though.
2) I type well over 100 WPM, and I have only known one person who could type as fast as I can. Usually good typers do about 40 WPM, so most aren't anywhere close to as fast as I am.
3) I have NEVER said I have beaten "the market" ever.
4) I am super smart. Just a fact. Smarter than you by far. I've not seen a person on these boards who is smarter than I am. Am I smarter than "everyone?" Of course not. In a world of now over 8 billion people, it is highly likely there are a handful smarter than I am out there.
5) So, what else? Hmm. I'm a better piano player than anyone here...for certain. I'm better at parkour than anyone here. I was a better diver and gymnast in my youth than anyone here. I'm a better bowler than probably anyone here. I'm PROBABLY one of the best if not the best cubers (as in Rubik's) here. I can play guitar and sing better than the vast majority of those here. I can skip rocks better than anyone here for sure. I am like world-class in that arena (not kidding). I honestly should do some competitions there. I'm a better chef than probably anyone here. I know more about manufacturing and manufacturing software than anyone here. I know more about the generic drug industry and biotechnology than anyone here. I know more baseball history/stats than anyone here. I've been to at least as many states in the Continental US as anyone here (I've been to all of them). I'm a better basketball free throw shooter than anyone here. In my youth, I could throw a baseball faster than anyone here. I'm probably forgetting some things.
What CAN'T I do? I can not draw with a damn. I'm no good at woodworking.
I am pretty sure you are the best nude modeler. And you can make the best pancakes. Mrs. Flagpole can assuredly attest to that. Mrs. Flagpole???

I don't talk about my bits and pieces, but yes, I actually DO make the best pancakes...since you asked.

2 years ago 02/16/2024 2:58pm EST

re: Sally Vix

Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) I have HUGE biceps. I never said anything about being bigger. I would imagine they are since they are HUGE though.
2) I type well over 100 WPM, and I have only known one person who could type as fast as I can. Usually good typers do about 40 WPM, so most aren't anywhere close to as fast as I am.
3) I have NEVER said I have beaten "the market" ever.
4) I am super smart. Just a fact. Smarter than you by far. I've not seen a person on these boards who is smarter than I am. Am I smarter than "everyone?" Of course not. In a world of now over 8 billion people, it is highly likely there are a handful smarter than I am out there.
5) So, what else? Hmm. I'm a better piano player than anyone here...for certain. I'm better at parkour than anyone here. I was a better diver and gymnast in my youth than anyone here. I'm a better bowler than probably anyone here. I'm PROBABLY one of the best if not the best cubers (as in Rubik's) here. I can play guitar and sing better than the vast majority of those here. I can skip rocks better than anyone here for sure. I am like world-class in that arena (not kidding). I honestly should do some competitions there. I'm a better chef than probably anyone here. I know more about manufacturing and manufacturing software than anyone here. I know more about the generic drug industry and biotechnology than anyone here. I know more baseball history/stats than anyone here. I've been to at least as many states in the Continental US as anyone here (I've been to all of them). I'm a better basketball free throw shooter than anyone here. In my youth, I could throw a baseball faster than anyone here. I'm probably forgetting some things.
What CAN'T I do? I can not draw with a damn. I'm no good at woodworking.
Soooo .... of of the 8 BILLION people on the planet you are claiming to be around the 6th smartest? You are probably smarter than Newton ever was, or Einstein ever was, or Galileo ever was or Leibnitz or anyone else. Flagpole - you are the GREATEST!!! TAKE A BOW!

How can I be the greatest when there are a handful who are smarter than me?

2 years ago 02/16/2024 3:01pm EST

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Soooo .... of of the 8 BILLION people on the planet you are claiming to be around the 6th smartest? You are probably smarter than Newton ever was, or Einstein ever was, or Galileo ever was or Leibnitz or anyone else. Flagpole - you are the GREATEST!!! TAKE A BOW!
How can I be the greatest when there are a handful who are smarter than me?

Einstein was the greatest in math and physics. You are top 2 or 3 in pretty much everything.

Page 3,259 of 3,560

1 3,258 3,259 3,260 3,560

Next Last

What People Are Talking About On LetsRun

No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.

Reply Replying to

Username

Password

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview

By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Remember me on this device.

Real Runners, Real Reviews

Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt. Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.

What shoe are you reviewing?

Rate your shoe

Overall Rating

Appearance

Comfort

Cushioning

Durability

Value

I would buy this shoe again

Yes No

Would you buy this shoe again?

One-line review. Optional. Your written review provides information to readers that numbers can't.

Email Optional. Required for t-shirt drawing.

Real runner reviews • Community-powered rankings

Down goes the Dow

This thread has already been deleted.

You have been subscribed.

Down goes the Dow

Jump To A Page

Follow agip

Block agip

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow seattle prattle

Block seattle prattle

Follow Sally Vix

Block Sally Vix

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow seattle prattle

Block seattle prattle

Follow Sally Vix

Block Sally Vix

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow seattle prattle

Block seattle prattle

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow Sally Vix

Block Sally Vix

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow Sally Vix

Block Sally Vix

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow Sally Vix

Block Sally Vix

Jump To A Page

This thread has already been deleted.

Reply Replying to

You have been subscribed.

Real Runners, Real Reviews