hnkbotz wrote:
We need to look at some justices.
maybe start with the guy that appointed them
-
90
-
hnkbotz wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
Section 8 Enumerated Powers
ArtI.S8.1 Overview of Congress's Enumerated Powers
Clause 1 General Welfare
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;Where in that text do you see the word "tariff"?
General Sauer (the government's attorney in Learning Resources v. Trump) didn't even try the stupid argument you are now trying to make with rhetorical questions (which is usually a sign of a weak argument and/or a low IQ).
70 -
Sally Vix wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
joe biden was following the law. If you ask for asylum they get to come in and wait for your hearing.
I know you don't like the law, but that's what it said. And that's what biden did.
"The President's role is to ensure the nation's borders are secure and to protect the American people from the effects of unlawful migration. This includes taking action against illegal aliens, potential terrorists, and the entry of contraband and fugitives. The President's administration can also adjust parole policies and take measures to resume Migrant Protection Protocols."
Where do you plagiarize this from?
51 -
maga2024 wrote:
AIligator AIcatraz 45-47! wrote:
When your international trade actions get shown to be unconstitutional, just virtue signal to distract! Brilliant!
Is there anyone more generous than the Trump family? Trump didn't take a salary from the presidency, built a $300 million ballroom all by himself, and has donated both his time and his possessions to America.
27 -
And the trade deficit wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
"The President's role is to ensure the nation's borders are secure and to protect the American people from the effects of unlawful migration. This includes taking action against illegal aliens, potential terrorists, and the entry of contraband and fugitives. The President's administration can also adjust parole policies and take measures to resume Migrant Protection Protocols."
Where do you plagiarize this from?
See the quotation marks I used? That is what you do to indicate that the words on not your own.
36 -
AIligator AIcatraz 45-47! wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
"we should be less a constitutional democratic republic and more an islamic monarchy"
They’re a developed and rich country who doesn’t have a migrant problem. Why? Occasionally they shoot migrants who try to cross the border.
We shot one domestic terrorist who tried to cross the border of the House Speaker’s Lobby and MAGA had a conniption.
91 -
hnkbotz wrote:
We need to look at some justices.
Lindsey Hannigans is looking for some federal work. She is highly recommended.
30 -
hnkbotz wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
Section 8 Enumerated Powers
ArtI.S8.1 Overview of Congress's Enumerated Powers
Clause 1 General Welfare
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;Where in that text do you see the word "tariff"?
Not in the IEEPA.
60 -
AIligator AIcatraz 45-47! wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
are you the guy who also falsely claimed that Poland doesn't have immigrants?
anyway, you are digging a very deep hole here. Saudi of course has one of the very very largest immigrant populations on the planet.
Come on man. Try. Try. You could not have picked a worse example to make your argument. You want the US to have 30-40% of our population immigrants? Be more like Saudi, you say?
Saudi:
As of 2025, there are over 13 million immigrants living and working in Saudi Arabia, which constitutes approximately 35–37% of the total population. Additionally, 41.6% of inhabitants are reported to be immigrants as of 2024. This makes Saudi Arabia one of the top destinations for immigrants worldwide
Migrant workers are different. Qatar also has a lot of migrant workers. But you know what they don’t have? Birthright citizenship
Qatar has an Islamic terrorist military facility in Idaho. I heard it's their Second Amendment right.
72 -
Sally Vix wrote:
And the trade deficit wrote:
Where do you plagiarize this from?
See the quotation marks I used? That is what you do to indicate that the words on not your own.
See a citation? I don’t.
62 -
trump2028. wrote:
Is there anyone more generous than the Trump family? Trump didn't take a salary from the presidency, built a $300 million ballroom all by himself, and has donated both his time and his possessions to America.
0/10
61 -
trump2028. wrote:
maga2024 wrote:
When your international trade actions get shown to be unconstitutional, just virtue signal to distract! Brilliant!
Is there anyone more generous than the Trump family? Trump didn't take a salary from the presidency, built a $300 million ballroom all by himself, and has donated both his time and his possessions to America.
So he virtue signaled while his international trade policy was shown to be unconstitutional. Doesn’t seem generous to waste the office of the Presidency like that
91 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Since its founding in 1829, the Democratic Party has fought against every major civil rights
initiative, and has a long history of discrimination.The Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction,
founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynchings, and fought against
the civil rights acts of the 1950s and 1960s.In contrast, the Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party. Its mission
was to stop the spread of slavery into the new western territories with the aim of abolishing it
entirely. This effort, however, was dealt a major blow by the Supreme Court. In the 1857 case
Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court ruled that slaves aren’t citizens; they’re property. The seven
justices who voted in favor of slavery? All Democrats. The two justices who dissented? Both
Republicans.The slavery question was, of course, ultimately resolved by a bloody civil war. The commander
in-chief during that war was the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln – the man who
freed the slaves.Where did you plagiarize this from?
102 -
El Runkin wrote:
There was no "novel" legal interpretation. Whoever told you that was lying to you.
Trump was convicted under § 175.10 -- "Falsifying business records in the first degree."
The plain English language for that New York statute (enacted in 1986) is:
"A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof."
That's English. What "novel" interpretation was you talking about? There was and is no "novel" interpretation of that. It was interpreted to mean what it says in English.
Pretty sure that novel legal theory idea came from catturd or libs of tictoc
72 -
slip rogers wrote:
hnkbotz wrote:
We need to look at some justices.
maybe start with the guy that appointed them
It’s all good. Will make MAGA stronger, more motivated at midterms and make it law of The People.
The near term, Dems get their wish to support China and protect their interests…because AOC fell on her face.
Midterms they will get smashed and then Trump is more powerful than ever.
y’ll are crazy to bet against Trump on this issue. The GOAT is so for a reason.
Read the book.
17 -
14
-
This country needs some calm talerico talk.
love this guy. Hope he is president one day.31 -
AIligator AIcatraz 45-47! wrote:
Frantically searching for those fringe tweets that say what you want to hear
80 -
OOPS!
60 -
telling: there is no talk from maga about how good tariffs are, and how congress should now debate them and enact them if a good idea. None. Zero. No one is talking about doing this the right, constitutional way via congress.
the only talk from maga is whether trump should be allowed to enact tariffs unilaterally.
Shows you that maga wants an unfettered king. and they want DJT to be that unfettered king. That's what trump wants, that's what the GOP wants.
That's their position from here on out. Vote accordingly.
71
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.