Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, Doug Band, Andrew Cuomo, John Kerry, Cheryl Mills, Reid Hoffman, Larry Summers, Stacey Plaskett, Ehud Barak, Lois Frankel, Chuck Schumer, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
-
23
-
This quoted post has been removed.
Sally- not insulting people again.
42 -
This quoted post has been removed.
He drafted it in crayon before typing it on his leapfrog.
44 -
sheengnarly wrote:
Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, Doug Band, Andrew Cuomo, John Kerry, Cheryl Mills, Reid Hoffman, Larry Summers, Stacey Plaskett, Ehud Barak, Lois Frankel, Chuck Schumer, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Your list is incomplete
22 -
Questions for you wrote:
This quoted post has been removed.
Sally- not insulting people again.
Calling posters idiots and stupid is not appropriate. Saying what someone posted is juvenile is just stating the obvious.
37 -
hussars 1776 wrote:
Lowest approval rate yet for the pig. 40.9%. A 3 handle is possible, amazingly.
America hates Piggie
Fake numbers. Many people are saying his approval rating is 600% maybe even 800%
82 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Questions for you wrote:
Sally- not insulting people again.
Calling posters idiots and stupid is not appropriate. Saying what someone posted is juvenile is just stating the obvious.
Sally- the arbiter of what is and isn’t an insult.
75 -
Questions for you wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Calling posters idiots and stupid is not appropriate. Saying what someone posted is juvenile is just stating the obvious.
Sally- the arbiter of what is and isn’t an insult.
Going 10 years without calling another poster an idiot gives one the upper-hand on insults.
35 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Questions for you wrote:
Sally- the arbiter of what is and isn’t an insult.
Going 10 years without calling another poster an idiot gives one the upper-hand on insults.
If you are winning the discourse - there is no need to name-call or spew insults. You already won. Insults and name-calling are for those who lost the discourse and have to resort to other measures. You lost! Just accept it.
34 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Questions for you wrote:
Sally- the arbiter of what is and isn’t an insult.
Going 10 years without calling another poster an idiot gives one the upper-hand on insults.
Now that’s just juvenile.
22 -
Newname wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
trump is protecting those 'pedophile oligarchs'
the very same trump you urged everyone to vote for
your judgment isn't very good.
The entire apparatus us protecting the pedophile oligarchs.
Never urged anyone to vote for Trump and have never voted for him
Your honesty (or is in intellect) is absent
You do support Hamas and remain an anti-semite.
34 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Going 10 years without calling another poster an idiot gives one the upper-hand on insults.
If you are winning the discourse - there is no need to name-call or spew insults. You already won. Insults and name-calling are for those who lost the discourse and have to resort to other measures. You lost! Just accept it.
Usually when you’re losing, you switch to another handle and rage at people.
Speaking of, did you find those magic charts that you were referencing yesterday?
61 -
Questions for you wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
If you are winning the discourse - there is no need to name-call or spew insults. You already won. Insults and name-calling are for those who lost the discourse and have to resort to other measures. You lost! Just accept it.
Usually when you’re losing, you switch to another handle and rage at people.
Speaking of, did you find those magic charts that you were referencing yesterday?
Who were you yesterday? You can't be troubled to register and be the same person every day? I am registered and only post under this EVERY DAY. Those charts are still there for you. Again, register and be a stalwart of the community. Not a fly-by-nighter.
26 -
Questions for you wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
If you are winning the discourse - there is no need to name-call or spew insults. You already won. Insults and name-calling are for those who lost the discourse and have to resort to other measures. You lost! Just accept it.
Usually when you’re losing, you switch to another handle and rage at people.
Speaking of, did you find those magic charts that you were referencing yesterday?
Can’t find something that doesn’t exist.
40 -
Young people are regretting their vote for the pig. Republicans are wrecking the economy as they have every single time in the last 40+ years.
BREAKING: The inflation-adjusted average starting salary for college graduates is down -8% YoY, to ~$54,500, the lowest in at least 6 years.
41 -
Oldrunningguy wrote:
El Runkin wrote:
Here's the document:
It's pretty confusing (at least to me). I think it's a summary of an interview of a law enforcement officer (identity redacted) conducted in 2020 about two boxes of documents that the officer "recovered" from a deceased detective (identity redacted) who was on the Epstein case in the beginning (around 2003 to 2008?). See page 1. Unclear (at least to me) whether the officer being interviewed in 2020 was ever involved with the Epstein investigation. It looks like he's just reciting what he learned from reading the content of the two boxes from the deceased detective (which I don't believe have been released).
The summary is pretty disjointed. Keeps mixing tenses, so you can't tell if its recording present sense impressions or past recollections. The subject matter jumps around too. The references to Trump (bottom of page 3 to top of page 4) kind of come out of nowhere and don't seem to fit in, like the officer being interviewed wanted to insert them. It's unclear if there are any supporting documents for the Trump references, or if the officer is just relaying what he heard from the deceased officer 14 years earlier. It appears that Trump called the Palm Beach police after learning that Epstein was under investigation. That's about it, so it's somewhat weird that it made it into the interview. There is no mention or reference that Trump provided any evidence other than "everyone has known he's been doing this." Trump doesn't appear to have elaborated on who "everyone" is or what they knew Epstein has been doing, or why Trump didn't report any of this earlier. No evidence mentioned at all. Unclear why Trump even took the time to call.
The content of the two boxes have not been released, as far as I know.
Thx for that summation it is a convoluted story without documentation.
Imagine if you were a detective investigating a bank robbery and some rando buddy of the suspect calls up and says he’s glad you busted him because everyone knows he’s been robbing banks. You are going to immediately believe you have an accomplice and you would be sending over the wagon to pick him up.
Definitely a weird after-the-fact thing for Trump to do, especially since he didn't provide any evidence. He had to know he raising flags on himself. But that was outweighed in his mind by his desire to either (1) get out in front and start a narrative on bad facts he knew were coming out ("TRUMP told [redacted] that he was around EPSTEIN once when teenagers were present and TRUMP "got the hell out of there"") and/or (2) maliciously try and stick it to a former friend he now hates ("TRUMP said MAXWELL was EPSTEIN's operative, "she is evil and to focus on her"").
^^^^^^
[Maxwell in pre-evil days]
31 -
hussars 1776 wrote:
Young people are regretting their vote for the pig. Republicans are wrecking the economy as they have every single time in the last 40+ years.
BREAKING: The inflation-adjusted average starting salary for college graduates is down -8% YoY, to ~$54,500, the lowest in at least 6 years.
wow here are the numbers of young people who are having their faces eaten by the face eating party. Holy smokes midterms are going to be glorious.
from +9 to -42.
That is truly amazing. Rs had a huge lead and were winning more minorities and youths. Then the Rs went crazy. Everything trump touches dies.
YouGov: Trump Approval (ages 18-29 only)
🟢 Feb 2025: 52–43% (+9)
🔴 Apr 2025: 32-53% (-21)
🔴 Dec 2025: 29–66% (-37)
🔴 Feb 2026: 25–67% (-42) ← new low41
3 posts were removed from this page.
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.