fat chix need lovin two
fat chix need lovin two
Todays Tom Sawyer wrote:
Your grammar isn't good enough for you to be a snob.
Good Lord in Heaven! Could you not tell that I was joking?
In your handle you should have used an apostrophe to form the possessive. "Todays" should be "Today's." People like you with your mean, mean pride.
You try registering a name with an apostrophe.
But it's cool, man. I just get high on you and the energy you trade.
Curious Person wrote:
There is no meaningful difference between the person who does not read and the person who cannot read. I hope you don't vote.
Cribbed from Mark Twain (he's an author, for those of you who don't read) but truer words never spoken.
On a message board where the average poster invests, say, ten hours a week in developing his physical capacities, it's sad to see such a surprising and unapologeic indifference to developing their minds. Granted, reading random magazine articles or even random internet postings is something, but so is jogging a dozen yards randomly during a stroll, but it will never compete with sustained attention to a prolonged, rigorous train of thought.
Reading random snippets bespeaks a lack of endurance, focus, seriousness. An educated person, like a fit person, continues to exercise his mind rigorously after graduating, just as a serious athlete continues to train.
When he stops training, he is no longer an athlete; when he stops educating himself, he is no longer an educated person. Anima sana in corpore sano (Asics). An empty mind in a sound body is not an athlete, but a jock. If you have earned the title by letting you mind go flabby, wear it.
Michael Smith, I love your post. We should have more like it!
From a glance at these posts, I must say the pro-reader lobby is a pretty snobbish group. Makes me want to burn some books. I live in FL so I might as well go to that Qu'ran book burning thingie tomorrow.
RonRon wrote:
I got in this same arguement with a chick I dated wonce when she was telling me how great the Harry Potter books are and I should read them. I told her why should I read them when I can go watch the fvcking movie and get the same thing alot faster and its more fun. WE borke up because she was the same way, a snob about reading and being smarter than otehr poeple. You can read most books on Wikapedia and get everything important is 15 mintues. Books are old technology for poeple to show off.
Maybe if you read more, you would be able to write more coherently.
Seriously, how is it possible to spell like you do? These aren't simple keystroke errors either. "Poeple", 2 times?
Are you too stupid to use the spell check function, or are you waiting for the movie to come out for that too?
just accept that she probably is intellectually and morally
superior as well as more knowledgeable than most of you guys here. Everything else is projection.
asdffsad wrote:
Granted, she is a college psychology professor and reads a lot. She was rifling off names of all these different books she has recently read. I'm a professional with a master's degree and I doubt I read one full book per year. I just don't usually have the patience; I feel much more relaxed by being outdoors on a run/hike or whatever. Reading is very boring for me. I felt a bit taken aback by her arrogance (she said it in a fairly snobby manner) and wanted to comment. But, I didn't say anything.
If you had read more books you would probably have a better grasp of the English language and would have felt more qualified to respond to her.
Is this a serious question? I know this is to lets run crowd but if you cant read at least two books a month in your leisure time....holier than thou my ass, no wonder the majority of you all are f**ktards
I forgot to mention that this woman is very obese. Does that change your opinion?
Thank you Einstien!!!! I can read and communicate just fine thank you very much but I'm not writing "War and Peace" so I don't care what grammar Nazi's think My point was that its nothing to get a stick up your @ss about because some one doesn't read books when we have modern technology that has replaced reading books, and by the way this chick who read Harry Potter was a fat also and it was a mercy date but she thought she was better then me because she read Harry Potter when I got my information visually. Which in the case of those stupid vampire books especially is much better because they suck and why waist time reading when you can watch the movie and get on with your life!!!
I bet they both hate running anyway because it makes them sweaty and tired which is all you can expect from a FAT HOG!!!
lol!
asdffsad wrote:
I felt a bit taken aback by her arrogance (she said it in a fairly snobby manner) and wanted to comment. But, I didn't say anything.
What you should have told her was that you feel sad for any snobby chick who doesn't blow you at least once a year.