The Bare Facts wrote:
shut up wrote:No, they're pledging their allegiance 'to the republic' (i.e. the government). So, the difference is only the people they're pledging to. In authoritarian states, they pledge to a person, yes. And here they pledge their allegiance to multiple people that make up the government (and just throw in that part about morals and ideals on which our country was built to make it feel nice). Either way, it's still a forced pledge of allegiance, and you should not have to pledge your allegiance to anybody. I don't agree with this kid's reasons, but fundamentally, he's right about not being forced to say the pledge.
Think about it this way: would you try to force college students to say the pledge? Would you make it mandatory at your job or everyone else's job? If not, don't force it on kids! Ignorance doesn't make everything okay.
That's why I said in my first post that the kid shouldn't be forced to say the pledge if he doesn't want to. Why don't you read the whole thread before you make an ass out of yourself.
Just pointing out that the U.S. is not a totalitarian state, a fact that apparently has escaped some dumb teenagers in this country.
Well, it's not a totalitarian state yet... The point was the pledge is a characteristic of a totalitarian state. You said that was different because they were pledging allegiance to a person. That is not necessarily different from what is happening here, and that is exactly what I pointed out in my post, then I added a little more on. That's all there is to it. You don't have to insult my intelligence because I'm making a valid point.