LOL, you guys are obsessed with this Sally person!
Here is who these clowns put on the presidential ticket for 2024:
1) A lady who has an IQ around 75.5 who refused to do her duties as Border Czar and admitted she can't think on her feet and As prosecutor in LA no one can find any cases that the prosecuted. She should be known as "Do nothing Kamala." Amazing that she was paid a penny as VP.
2) A governor as corrupt as they come who was caught driving drunk and driving about 100 MPH. They say when you are caught driving drunk you typically have done it 200 times before you are caught. So, he likely drove drunk 200 times and probably at speeds over 100 MPH.
Those 2 are the people were most qualified to be on the Democrat presidential ticket. I would laugh but it is incredibly dangerous that they had a chance to occupy the Oval Office.
Trump is such a fckup that you have to rehash the 2024 election 😄😄😄😄😄
LOL, you guys are obsessed with this Sally person!
Here is who these clowns put on the presidential ticket for 2024:
1) A lady who has an IQ around 75.5 who refused to do her duties as Border Czar and admitted she can't think on her feet and As prosecutor in LA no one can find any cases that the prosecuted. She should be known as "Do nothing Kamala." Amazing that she was paid a penny as VP.
2) A governor as corrupt as they come who was caught driving drunk and driving about 100 MPH. They say when you are caught driving drunk you typically have done it 200 times before you are caught. So, he likely drove drunk 200 times and probably at speeds over 100 MPH.
Those 2 are the people were most qualified to be on the Democrat presidential ticket. I would laugh but it is incredibly dangerous that they had a chance to occupy the Oval Office.
Don't forget, a governor who has done ZERO to stop the day care center fraud throughout MN.
President Trump used his veto power this week for the first time since returning to the White House, rejecting a pair of bills linked to a Colorado water pipeline and a tribal village in the Everglades.
This is what our formerly respected DOJ used to speak like and the principles it stood for.
Jack Smith: For nearly three decades I have been a career prosecutor. I have served during both Republican and Democratic administrations and I've been guided by those principles in every role I've held. I continued to honor those principles when I was appointed to serve as special counsel in November of 2022. The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power. Our investigation also developed powerful evidence that showed that President Trump willfully retained highly classified documents after he left office in January of 2021, storing them at his social club, including in a ballroom and a bathroom. He then repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents. I remain grateful for the counsel, judgment, and advice of my team as I executed my responsibilities. I am both saddened and angered that President Trump has sought revenge against career prosecutors, FBI agents, and support staff simply for doing their jobs and for having worked on those cases. These dedicated public servants are the best of us, and they have been wrongly vilified and improperly dismissed from their jobs. I made my decisions in the investigation without regard to President Trump's political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 Presidential election. We took our actions based on the facts and the law, the very lessons I learned early in my career as a prosecutor. We followed Justice Department policies and observed legal requirements. The timing and speed of our work reflects the strength of the evidence and our confidence that we would have secured convictions at trial. If asked whether to prosecute a former President based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat.
Oh yeah. You know how Trump republicans have made the rounds on Fox News crying about how Jack Smith wrongfully obtained their phone records?
Sure enough Jack Smith had receipts why he did that. Boris Epstein and Steve Bannon text exchanges prove that Trump himself ordered his surrogates to call the lawmakers to try to get their help to stop the certification. Their phone records immediately became material evidence of Trumps criminal schemes. They would be needed at trial.
Once again, Trumpian lawmakers are full of sh!t. They know why their phone records were obtained but they still gaslight the rubes.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
