One year of Covid "vaccines" as of next week.
4th shot, then 5th shot, then 6th shot. On and on and on it goes.............
When will you learn ?
One year of Covid "vaccines" as of next week.
4th shot, then 5th shot, then 6th shot. On and on and on it goes.............
When will you learn ?
fisky wrote:
The unvaxxed are dying, in a large part, to the actions of Athony Fauci, who sabotaged "trials" of HCQ and Ivermectin and then pushed his solution... remesivir... on the public.
Fauci green-lighted remdesivir following studies in which the control group did not receive a real placebo. ...despite this fauxcebo chicanery, Dr. Fauci’s researchers just couldn’t get remdesivir to show any improvement in COVID
The researchers, in fact, had changed the trial “endpoints” twice in an effort to create a meager appearance of benefit....Altering protocols in the middle of an ongoing study is an interference commonly known as “scientific fraud” or “falsification.”
The Lancet had just published a placebo-controlled Chinese study that showed remdesivir utterly ineffective at keeping hospitalized patients alive OR reducing the duration of hospitalizations.48 Even more importantly, remdesivir did not reduce the presence of the virus in the blood. Worst of ... a Chinese study confirmed remdesivir’s deadly toxicity. The Chinese regulators and researchers shuttered that trial because of potentially lethal side effects. Remdesivir caused serious injuries in 12 percent of the patients, ...Chinese study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, peer-reviewed study, published in the world’s premier scientific journal, The Lancet.
[From the White House] Dr. Fauci... declared... NIAID’s clinical trial for remdesivir shows “quite good news,” he said, glossing over the drug’s failure to demonstrate any mortality advantage. He claimed that his study had therefore proven remdesivir so remarkably beneficial to COVID patients that he had decided that it would be unethical to deny Americans benefits of this wonder drug. He was, he declared, unblinding and ending the study and giving remdesivir to the placebo group. Remdesivir would be America’s new “standard of care”
Remdesivir actually has has quality trials showing it works, unlike HCQ and IVM. I understand the controversy over efficacy in light of additional trials and the fact that it must be administered by IV fairly early limits it's most efficacious use.
I am fine with scapegoating rem. -- it's not a great drug. But, to do it in comparison to HCQ and IVM is hilarious. There are tons of trials for HCQ and IVM. They show it doesn't work!
I get the allure of drugs with no data. They might work! Why not? But HCQ and IVM have been shown time and time again to do -nothing- against COVID. Where's the fun in that? Does Fauci have God powers and magically changed human biology when he realized HCQ was working? I would buy that conspiracy theory :)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FF4Fys1VgAEK3g0?format=jpg&name=smallDanM wrote:
One year of Covid "vaccines" as of next week.
4th shot, then 5th shot, then 6th shot. On and on and on it goes.............
When will you learn ?
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/08/omicron-pfizer-ceo-says-we-may-need-fourth-covid-vaccine-doses-sooner-than-expected.htmlhttps://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2021-12-08/fauci-says-its-a-matter-of-when-not-if-the-definition-of-fully-vaccinated-will-change
joed|rtt wrote:
antivaxxers killing democracy wrote:
https://ca.yahoo.com/news/three-doses-pfizer-covid-vaccine-150551717.htmlAntivaxxers go home DEVASTATED!
You sure about that? It's a small sample size, but 13 of 21 confirmed omicron cases (62%) in Israel are among individuals who are fully boosted. About 4 million of Israel's 8.18 million people have received a booster shot (roughly 50%). Those numbers would indicate that the booster isn't doing much to prevent infection against Omicron (a mutation that does not appear to result in severe disease either, based on a limited sampling of data).
Well the booster is certainly better than prior infected at least, which is just as bad as only 2x doses against Omicron:
https://twitter.com/JanineKimpel/status/1468700628922904591?s=20Imagine getting COVID and then realize it doesn't protect you from getting it again. Antivaxxers truly devastated.
joed|rtt wrote:
antivaxxers killing democracy wrote:
https://ca.yahoo.com/news/three-doses-pfizer-covid-vaccine-150551717.htmlAntivaxxers go home DEVASTATED!
You sure about that? It's a small sample size, but 13 of 21 confirmed omicron cases (62%) in Israel are among individuals who are fully boosted. About 4 million of Israel's 8.18 million people have received a booster shot (roughly 50%). Those numbers would indicate that the booster isn't doing much to prevent infection against Omicron (a mutation that does not appear to result in severe disease either, based on a limited sampling of data).
Exactly
Covidiocy wrote:
Exactly
See my previous post. In several experiments, Omicron flattens all neutralization except hybrid and boosted to baseline. Brutal for the dudes who thought getting COVID was a good idea.
Lots more data to come here, of course.
Covidiocy wrote:
By the way, all of my immediate and extended families have gotten Covid now, mostly the delta strain (timeline), and almost all of my friends. Ages range from kids to mostly mid-40s to mid-50s. My mom and aunt are jabbed (80s), as well they should be. Not my uncle though (late 70s). I would say 98% of them employed early treatment.
The overweight boozers & smokers among us used Ivermectin, but they used it right away when they first fell ill. They probably had the mildest cases of all after the first couple days. Some of us used ionic iodine, massive doses of vit D and vit C, quercetin, zinc, and H1 & H2 blockers to thwart inflammation. The only one who was almost hospitalized was an unjabbed friend who absolutely refused early treatment. Eventually, he was prescribed Fluvoxamine and Mabs from urgent care. He’s doing much better.
NONE OF US WENT HOME DEVASTATED. Early treatment works if you don’t want the jab. Or you can take your chances with the Fauci protocol at the hospital, including hepatotoxic Remdesivir after the viral replication cycle is complete, which is utterly stupid. But, hey man, it’s peer reviewed!
Holy hell. Clearly a post from an educated person, but yet full of ignorance. Stay off the social media.
More excerpts from The Real Anthony Fauci... is remdesivir the real cause of high US deaths?
The British Medical Journal pointed out, “None of the randomized controlled trials published so far, however, have shown that remdesivir saves significantly more lives than standard medical care.”
...Then, on October 19, 2020, three days before remdesivir’s FDA approval, the World Health Organization published a definitive study on remdesivir involving 11,266 COVID-19 patients in 405 hospitals and 30 countries. The power of this study dwarfed the Fauci/Gilead project, which had recruited 1,062 patients. In the WHO’s trial, remdesivir failed to reduce mortality, and failed to reduce the need for ventilators OR the length of hospital stays. WHO researchers found no detectable benefits from remdesivir and recommended against its use in COVID-19 patients.
...Dr. Fauci and the FDA knew about the WHO study before the FDA issued the EUA for remdesivir, and almost certainly read the preprints and understood the findings. It appears, in fact, that Dr. Fauci once again hurried the approval through FDA so as to beat the publication of a negative study.
Assessing remdesivir’s impact on hospitalized COVID-19 patients is difficult, in part, because—like COVID-19—remdesivir causes extreme toxicity to lungs and kidneys,78 and mimics several of the other lethal symptoms of COVID, including multi-organ failure.79 Many doctors believe our country’s record COVID-19 fatalities are at least in part due to widespread use of remdesivir in 2020. “We had the most deaths worldwide,” says Dr. Ryan Cole. “It’s a haunting question: How many of these Americans were remdesivir casualties?”
Brazil, one of the first nations to widely use remdesivir, had the second highest death toll.
Dr. Cole told me that in the animal studies [of remdesivir], one-fourth of the animals died from kidney failure.
Kennedy Jr., Robert F. . The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (Children’s Health Defense) (pp. 171-174). Skyhorse. Kindle Edition.
Buy the book. Read it. Tell your friends about it. Your parents might get talked into taking remdesivir. Tell them about the book so they know this side of the story. At best, it's not "following the science." At worse, it's... well, read the book and decide for yourself.
Covidiocy wrote:
By the way, all of my immediate and extended families have gotten Covid now, mostly the delta strain (timeline), and almost all of my friends. Ages range from kids to mostly mid-40s to mid-50s. My mom and aunt are jabbed (80s), as well they should be. Not my uncle though (late 70s). I would say 98% of them employed early treatment.
The overweight boozers & smokers among us used Ivermectin, but they used it right away when they first fell ill. They probably had the mildest cases of all after the first couple days. Some of us used ionic iodine, massive doses of vit D and vit C, quercetin, zinc, and H1 & H2 blockers to thwart inflammation. The only one who was almost hospitalized was an unjabbed friend who absolutely refused early treatment. Eventually, he was prescribed Fluvoxamine and Mabs from urgent care. He’s doing much better.
NONE OF US WENT HOME DEVASTATED. Early treatment works if you don’t want the jab. Or you can take your chances with the Fauci protocol at the hospital, including hepatotoxic Remdesivir after the viral replication cycle is complete, which is utterly stupid. But, hey man, it’s peer reviewed!
Thanks for posting. How did you get Ivermectin? I have all the other supplements.
fisky wrote:
" Many doctors believe our country’s record COVID-19 fatalities are at least in part due to widespread use of remdesivir in 2020. “
Many doctors believe? How many? Which ones? What are their names? What type of doctors are they?
"Many people are saying" is straight out of the Trump playbook. And you actually believe this is evidence of anything? Well, many people are saying you're a circus clown. Many.
For nearly a month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s online vaccine tracker has shown that virtually everyone 65 and older in the United States — 99.9% — has received at least one covid vaccine dose.
That would be remarkable — if true.
But health experts and state officials say it’s certainly not.
They note that the CDC as of Dec. 5 has recorded more seniors at least partly vaccinated — 55.4 million — than there are people in that age group — 54.1 million, according to the latest census data from 2019. The CDC’s vaccination rate for residents 65 and older is also significantly higher than the 89% vaccination rate found in a poll conducted in November by KFF.
Imagine getting 2 shots of Pfizer and your booster and then the 3 shots for Omicron and then getting Covid,
And blaming the unvaxxed.
Bingo Is His Namo wrote:
fisky wrote:
" Many doctors believe our country’s record COVID-19 fatalities are at least in part due to widespread use of remdesivir in 2020. “
Many doctors believe? How many? Which ones? What are their names? What type of doctors are they?
"Many people are saying" is straight out of the Trump playbook. And you actually believe this is evidence of anything? Well, many people are saying you're a circus clown. Many.
The book is footnoted. Maybe you should, you know, read the book?
fisky wrote:
Covidiocy wrote:
By the way, all of my immediate and extended families have gotten Covid now, mostly the delta strain (timeline), and almost all of my friends. Ages range from kids to mostly mid-40s to mid-50s. My mom and aunt are jabbed (80s), as well they should be. Not my uncle though (late 70s). I would say 98% of them employed early treatment.
The overweight boozers & smokers among us used Ivermectin, but they used it right away when they first fell ill. They probably had the mildest cases of all after the first couple days. Some of us used ionic iodine, massive doses of vit D and vit C, quercetin, zinc, and H1 & H2 blockers to thwart inflammation. The only one who was almost hospitalized was an unjabbed friend who absolutely refused early treatment. Eventually, he was prescribed Fluvoxamine and Mabs from urgent care. He’s doing much better.
NONE OF US WENT HOME DEVASTATED. Early treatment works if you don’t want the jab. Or you can take your chances with the Fauci protocol at the hospital, including hepatotoxic Remdesivir after the viral replication cycle is complete, which is utterly stupid. But, hey man, it’s peer reviewed!
Thanks for posting. How did you get Ivermectin? I have all the other supplements.
I didn’t get Ivermectin. I was merely noting the family members who did seemed to fare the best. Which makes sense as it is both an ACE2 blocker & protease inhibitor. I believe they all got it from a compounding pharmacy, called in by a MD who is still practicing the “art” of medicine. Imagine that.
I actually asked my doctor about it, and he admitted it had utility, not so much as a prophylaxis but as early treatment. He said he would prescribe it in confidence, but then when I texted him asking for it, I got mere silence. Speaks volumes.
Thanks for sharing the book snippets. Remdesivir has some utility when employed early but not when the viral replication cycle is almost complete. It is highly toxic, and I have no doubt it contributed to a lot of mortality. Many nurses I know say the same thing.
Lastly, hydroxychloroquine by itself or with a nonsensical macrolide doesn’t work. Which is what all of the peer-reviewed research was set up to show. However, what they didn’t explore is does it work with elemental zinc, which is a fantastic RNA polymerase inhibitor intracellularly? HCQ is the bow. Zinc is the arrow. The bow gets the arrow into the cell. Outside the cell, the arrow is useless.
No kids
No recovered
Early treatment
To Harambe’s chagrin, I didn’t recommend anything to family members or friends. But when they asked me what I took to mitigate my own Covid, of course I shared.
You know what is cringe? I just went to Walgreens for the third time to pick up a needed medication. The drive through is closed, they are chronically understaffed w signs saying “Please don’t treat the employees who decided to show up badly,” and, yet, they have one entire line devoted to Covid, both testing and vaccination. They are not a pharmacy anymore because Covid is making their corporate people so much damn money.
As I walked out, I bought some alkaline water. The gal in front of me was obese and purchasing two Dr Peppers and a pack of Marlboros. That is everything wrong w America and Covid right there. But, ironically, I noticed they were out of at-home Covid tests. Cringe indeed.
Harambe wrote:
joed|rtt wrote:
You sure about that? It's a small sample size, but 13 of 21 confirmed omicron cases (62%) in Israel are among individuals who are fully boosted. About 4 million of Israel's 8.18 million people have received a booster shot (roughly 50%). Those numbers would indicate that the booster isn't doing much to prevent infection against Omicron (a mutation that does not appear to result in severe disease either, based on a limited sampling of data).
Well the booster is certainly better than prior infected at least, which is just as bad as only 2x doses against Omicron:
https://twitter.com/JanineKimpel/status/1468700628922904591?s=20Imagine getting COVID and then realize it doesn't protect you from getting it again. Antivaxxers truly devastated.
Of course it doesn’t. Getting re-exposed is merely another inoculation, a boost if you will, harnessing the entire nascent immune system (without have committed the jabbed, antigenic sin of creating antibodies that outcompete your natural humoral response without actually sterilizing the virus). Reinfection will be mild for the vast majority. Early treatment is still advised.
When you have a thrombotic or oncogenic-type episode in a few years, I wonder if you will be able to make the connection to the mRNA factories or if everything is spurious in your world, since you think you are the premier data scientist?
DanM wrote:
For nearly a month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s online vaccine tracker has shown that virtually everyone 65 and older in the United States — 99.9% — has received at least one covid vaccine dose.
That would be remarkable — if true.
But health experts and state officials say it’s certainly not.
They note that the CDC as of Dec. 5 has recorded more seniors at least partly vaccinated — 55.4 million — than there are people in that age group — 54.1 million, according to the latest census data from 2019. The CDC’s vaccination rate for residents 65 and older is also significantly higher than the 89% vaccination rate found in a poll conducted in November by KFF.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/many-seniors-are-vaccinated-cdcs-covid-vaccination-rates-appear-inflat-rcna7941
Many of the deaths and hospitalizations being recorded as unvaccinated are in fact vaccinated individuals whose vaccination status never made it into their electronic health record. Vaccinated individuals are almost as much of a threat to spread COVID to others as the unvaccinated. Much of the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" narrative is being fueled by bad record keeping. The vaccination database they are using to track vaccines in Texas has 9.1 million records (primarily kids school vaccination records), even though there are allegedly 18.4 million Texans who have received at least one vaccine.
The most reliable data comes from places with centralized record keeping (that is why I often refer to places like the UK and Israel). The DOD has excellent data (because soldiers and veterans basically use one provider for their healthcare).If you want to understand how the vaccines declined in effectiveness, don't listen to the likes of Harambe and 2600 bro, listen to the DOD:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm0620The medicare system has great stats on COVID for those 65+, but the Fed has buried the data. One of their contractors put out a report on it that upset a lot of people at the NIH and the CDC who are trying to manipulate and cover up statistics to sell another narrative:
https://www.naturalnews.com/files/Salus_Humetrix_VE_study_2021_09_28.pdffisky wrote:
Bingo Is His Namo wrote:
Many doctors believe? How many? Which ones? What are their names? What type of doctors are they?
"Many people are saying" is straight out of the Trump playbook. And you actually believe this is evidence of anything? Well, many people are saying you're a circus clown. Many.
The book is footnoted. Maybe you should, you know, read the book?
Tell you what. I'll do the research for you and see if I can find some names. If I can find, say, 3-4 names, will you promise to buy the book and read it?
Or, are you just wanting to ignore the message by discrediting the messager?
joed|rtt wrote:
DanM wrote:
For nearly a month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s online vaccine tracker has shown that virtually everyone 65 and older in the United States — 99.9% — has received at least one covid vaccine dose.
That would be remarkable — if true.
But health experts and state officials say it’s certainly not.
They note that the CDC as of Dec. 5 has recorded more seniors at least partly vaccinated — 55.4 million — than there are people in that age group — 54.1 million, according to the latest census data from 2019. The CDC’s vaccination rate for residents 65 and older is also significantly higher than the 89% vaccination rate found in a poll conducted in November by KFF.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/many-seniors-are-vaccinated-cdcs-covid-vaccination-rates-appear-inflat-rcna7941Many of the deaths and hospitalizations being recorded as unvaccinated are in fact vaccinated individuals whose vaccination status never made it into their electronic health record. Vaccinated individuals are almost as much of a threat to spread COVID to others as the unvaccinated. Much of the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" narrative is being fueled by bad record keeping. The vaccination database they are using to track vaccines in Texas has 9.1 million records (primarily kids school vaccination records), even though there are allegedly 18.4 million Texans who have received at least one vaccine.
The most reliable data comes from places with centralized record keeping (that is why I often refer to places like the UK and Israel). The DOD has excellent data (because soldiers and veterans basically use one provider for their healthcare).If you want to understand how the vaccines declined in effectiveness, don't listen to the likes of Harambe and 2600 bro, listen to the DOD:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm0620The medicare system has great stats on COVID for those 65+, but the Fed has buried the data. One of their contractors put out a report on it that upset a lot of people at the NIH and the CDC who are trying to manipulate and cover up statistics to sell another narrative:
https://www.naturalnews.com/files/Salus_Humetrix_VE_study_2021_09_28.pdf
"However, the CDC hasn’t changed its figure for the proportion of seniors who have been partly vaccinated. It remains at 99.9 percent. The CDC dashboard says that, as of Sunday, 3.1 million seniors in Pennsylvania had been at least partly vaccinated. The latest census data show that Pennsylvania has 2.4 million people 65 and older."
Covidiocy wrote:
As I walked out, I bought some alkaline water.
Oh good lord I think this has to be satire at this point. Points for keeping it up for so long.