W ICE. Great job. ICE is on fire this weekended, nationwide. If she's a 9 she's fine, doesn't apply to this case. Godspeed ICE and Border Patrol. Larceny? Don't think you have to show up to court after committing a crime? Shame. We are a nation of laws. No stealing. No overstaying a visa. No coming across a border illegally. No failure to report. Shame.
-
311
-
Message to libs
413 -
*'trump2028 wrote:
Bessent
"Traditionally, the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy."
I agree that widespread higher taxes are Trump's signature policy, but that's total horsesh!t that the "traditionally, Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy."
"I don't think this ruling is gonna go against us. If it does - what's THEIR plan for refunds?!"What does he mean "THEIR plan for refunds"? Who is "their [they]" to begin with? The Supreme Court? The plaintiffs? There's no requirement or law that says "they" have to propose some plan to untangle YOUR problems for YOU.
What's YOUR plan for refunds? You do have one, don't you? If not, you are apparently smart enough to know how to distribute dividends, so start there for the refund plan.
Are we just handing these importers big windfalls?Returning tax money is not a windfall to the person taxed.
Giving tax money to people who weren't taxed (e.g., recipients of Trump's proposed dividend) is arguably a windfall.
But returning tax money to the person you taxed is not a windfall. That would be returning to status quo.
What if exporters gave big discounts already? Then you give a refund? They'd be making on both sides."According to Solicitor General Sauer at oral argument, the imposition of tariffs invoked all kinds of existing contractual obligations between the exporters and importers regarding who pays what and why. Yeah, no sh!t. Of course it did. So why is a sophisticated, experienced businessman like Bessent pretending that refunding Trump's tariffs/taxes are some kind of new and confounding economic issue that no international business has ever considered before? I guess the answer is because he thinks the target audience for his comments are MAGA retards.
"I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that."They used their ample discretion to grant certiorari on a full panel ruling from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Consider the mess waded into.
"Fentanyl - we had FENTANYL tariffs., What's more of an emergency than hundreds of thousands of Americans dying every year?!The massive exaggeration regarding deaths aside, the following are far greater national issues than fentanyl use:
Russian aggression and sabotage
Islamic terrorism
National debt
Inflation
Mexican migrants eating cats and dogs
US military technology race with Russia and China
AI regulation
Waning US global influence
That's a good start. And then there is a separate list of the emergencies that exist in MAGA heads (e.g., figuring out who and how the 2020 election (and many other elections) was rigged). But the above is a productive list. Far more productive than pretending that tariffs will stop Americans from getting high. Jesus Christ.
61 -
El Runkin wrote:
*'trump2028 wrote:
Bessent
al issues than fentanyl use:
Russian aggression and sabotage. RE: Zero risk. These are not suicidal cultures. let them kill each other, protect the beautiful girls and children.
Islamic terrorism
RE: A threat because many Muslims are sick and respond to a gutless religion.
National debt: RE: Little risk. no country on Earth can ever surpass America. philosophically impossible.
Inflation. RE: Democrats are finished so this will come down now.
Mexican migrants eating cats and dogs. RE: can’t do that here, get rid of them if they are illegal, punish them if not.
US military technology race with Russia and China. RE: laughable. the brains are all here in America. Cradle to grave lives are not conducive to free thinking and ingenuity.
AI regulation: Re: Possible threat.
Waning US global influence. RE: laughable. there is zero influence on the World stage but what America controls.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.27 -
72
-
“Releasing the Epstein files is the easiest thing in the world,” she
said. “Just release it all, let the American people sort through every
bit of it, and, you know, support the victims. That’s just like the most
common sense, easiest thing in the world. But to spend any effort
trying to stop it makes — it just doesn’t make sense to me.”https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/14/trump-greene-affordability-gop-00651581
71 -
*'trump2028 wrote:
Message to libs
71 -
this is it wrote:
“Releasing the Epstein files is the easiest thing in the world,” she
said. “Just release it all, let the American people sort through every
bit of it, and, you know, support the victims. That’s just like the most
common sense, easiest thing in the world. But to spend any effort
trying to stop it makes — it just doesn’t make sense to me.”That would be awesome except there are no victims. Fantasyland ended.
111 -
Noyankee wrote:
this is it wrote:
“Releasing the Epstein files is the easiest thing in the world,” she
said. “Just release it all, let the American people sort through every
bit of it, and, you know, support the victims. That’s just like the most
common sense, easiest thing in the world. But to spend any effort
trying to stop it makes — it just doesn’t make sense to me.”That would be awesome except there are no victims. Fantasyland ended.
you are lying that there are no victims, but let's just play out your lie...if there are no victims, why is Trump playing hardball with Reps to stop them from voting for releasing the documents? Trump is bullying them around to stop.
What possible reason could there be for trump's actions, if there are no victims?
101 -
hussars 1776 wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
That would be awesome except there are no victims. Fantasyland ended.
you are lying that there are no victims, but let's just play out your lie...if there are no victims, why is Trump playing hardball with Reps to stop them from voting for releasing the documents? Trump is bullying them around to stop.
What possible reason could there be for trump's actions, if there are no victims?
Setting you all up for more failure, that’s an easy one. Trump will play this card when it’s necessary. Victimless crimes went out with the Democratic Party rule. it’s fun now.
18 -
Noyankee wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
you are lying that there are no victims, but let's just play out your lie...if there are no victims, why is Trump playing hardball with Reps to stop them from voting for releasing the documents? Trump is bullying them around to stop.
What possible reason could there be for trump's actions, if there are no victims?
Setting you all up for more failure, that’s an easy one. Trump will play this card when it’s necessary. Victimless crimes went out with the Democratic Party rule. it’s fun now.
Joe Biden and Kamala allowed about 15 million illegals into the nation, many of who were rapists, pedophiles and murderers. If Kamala had been elected she may have allowed another 20 million rapists, murderers and pedophiles into the country. We can all be thankful that Trump defeated Kamala.
38 -
Noyankee wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
you are lying that there are no victims, but let's just play out your lie...if there are no victims, why is Trump playing hardball with Reps to stop them from voting for releasing the documents? Trump is bullying them around to stop.
What possible reason could there be for trump's actions, if there are no victims?
Setting you all up for more failure, that’s an easy one. Trump will play this card when it’s necessary. Victimless crimes went out with the Democratic Party rule. it’s fun now.
hah that's pretty funny. Your view is that this terminally dumb half senile man is fighting tooth and nail to stop the documents from being released because the thousands of times he is mentioned in them don't exist. So releasing them will embarass the Dems when the thousands of times he is mentioned in them don't actually exist.
You, sir, a true maga idiot. You deserve being spanked by trump and asking for another.
61 -
hussars 1776 wrote:
hah that's pretty funny. Your view is that this terminally dumb half senile man is fighting tooth and nail to stop the documents from being released because the thousands of times he is mentioned in them don't exist. So releasing them will embarass the Dems when the thousands of times he is mentioned in them don't actually exist.
You, sir, a true maga idiot. You deserve being spanked by trump and asking for another.
If Trump was in them, Biden would have released them last year.
He didn't.
17 -
goy wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
hah that's pretty funny. Your view is that this terminally dumb half senile man is fighting tooth and nail to stop the documents from being released because the thousands of times he is mentioned in them don't exist. So releasing them will embarass the Dems when the thousands of times he is mentioned in them don't actually exist.
You, sir, a true maga idiot. You deserve being spanked by trump and asking for another.
If Trump was in them, Biden would have released them last year.
He didn't.
The unreleased docs are part of a criminal case against Ghislane. So the Feds couldn't release them when Biden was prez and the case was ongoing.
And oh yeah:
"According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed."
51 -
This quoted post has been removed.
literally, the magas had three main issues for years and years
immigration
inflation
epstein
That's why this is not going away. The Epstein case is built into the very foundation of Maga.
52 -
goy wrote:
hussars 1776 wrote:
hah that's pretty funny. Your view is that this terminally dumb half senile man is fighting tooth and nail to stop the documents from being released because the thousands of times he is mentioned in them don't exist. So releasing them will embarass the Dems when the thousands of times he is mentioned in them don't actually exist.
You, sir, a true maga idiot. You deserve being spanked by trump and asking for another.
If Trump was in them, Biden would have released them last year.
He didn't.
Exactly ... if there was anything damning against Trump Biden, Kamala and O. would have released them years ago. Once again, Trump is coming out unscathed. Another Loss for the Losers/Dems. 0-35 since Trump took office. You guys are losers!
26 -
hussars 1776 wrote:
The unreleased docs are part of a criminal case against Ghislane. So the Feds couldn't release them when Biden was prez and the case was ongoing.
And oh yeah:
"According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed."
If Trump is in them, why would he have to be informed?
Wouldn't he already know?
15
3 posts were removed from this page.
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.