You are dead wrong. Time to set you straight.
Russell outplayed Wilt? I don't think so.
head-to-head numbers:
Wilt and Russell played against each other 142 times in 10 years. Russell's team won 88, Wilt's teams won 54.
In those games Wilt averaged 28.7 ppg and 28.7 rpg, Russell averaged 14.5ppg and 23.7rpg
Wilt's high game vs. Russell was 62, and he had six other 50+ point games against Russell . Russell's high game against Wilt was 37, and he had only two other 30+ point games against Wilt.
Wilt's record 55 rebound game was against Russell, and he had six other 40+ rebound games vs. Russell.
Russell only had one 40+ rebound night against Wilt.
Wilt's teams lost all 4 seventh games against Russell's Celtics... (Russell's Celtics were 10-0 in game 7s during his career).
The total margin of defeat in those four 7th games was nine points
(begin the teammate argument because head-to-head is a no-contest)
Russell was limited offensively, Wilt limitless.
Playing the same role on the boards (i.e. primary rebounder except Wilt was also primary offense and Russell wasn't which means he should have been available for more o-boards to no avail) Chamberlain more or less swept him on rebounding titles (like 9 of the 11 seasons they were both active Wilt lead the league in rebounding).
Let's go to passing. Who was the only center in the history of the association to lead the league in assists? (and he almost did it twice) - not Bill Russell, that's right it was Chamberlain.
Russel's intangibles were great no doubt but he had lots of hall of fame bound teammates on a dynasty team run by the best coach/GM of his era running a system he fit into perfectly.
Surround Wilt with those same players, those Philly teams would have won every NBA Championship he played in.
Russell has acknowledged the many times that he simply could do nothing to stop Chamberlain. Compared to Russell, Chamberlain was a signficantly superior player; compared to almost all of the rest of the NBA, Wilt was *vastly* superior.