When you ignore the crimes of the politicians you like and weaponize the justice system to go after the politicians you don't like for the same crimes you undermine your justice system.
It's not "whataboutism" it's wanting EQUAL APPLICATION OF THE LAW. This is something every non-partisan hack should want.
But youre not going to get equal application. You dork. This is political war. How many times are stupid kuckservatives going to try to talk sense with people who want your head on a stick? People on the right are going to have to start to get harsh with tactics and toughen up or this is going to get worse and worse until these people literally program your own kids to kill you legally.
When can we expect an impeachment of Biden by the R house?
Serious question too- why wasn't Hillary indicted during Trump's term, specifically when there was a Republican congress? Are they that inept?
Because those are the wrong things to do and neither side should do them frivolously.
Trump did not use the state to go after Hillary. On the other hand, the Left/Deep State has gone after everyone around Trump both while he was in office (Flynn, himself) and once out of office (Stone, Navarro, Bannon, now himself).
But, if the Left is going to go to the lowest common denominator, we must return the favor.
Trump was/is a threat to the establishment. The establishment (using MSM) whipped up the general public (TDS). The general public (still suffering from TDS) have been primed to hate Trump no matter what. All the while, Trump was trying to help the general public.
It's a shame that so many people (several in this thread) can't see through the messages that the MSM is constantly sending them.
But if Hillary was committing crimes (Adultintheroom has listed some, and there are other examples) why shouldn't she have been charged? Are you indicating she was innocent at that time?
How has the MSM created the Trump Derangement Syndrome that so hinders our public discourse you ask? Take the first "controversy" of Trump's term versus Biden's lack of controversy.
Take a second and think about the very first day of both terms:
Trump's first day in the oval office: controversy about removing the MLK bust. Reality: someone was standing in front of it when the photo was taken. Result: the general public was primed to believe Trump was a racist.
Biden's first day in office: executive order that mask must be worn in federal parks and buildings. Reality: at the end of the day he and his family when to the Lincoln Memorial and had a photo-shoot unmasked. For some reason this barely made the news. Result: the public didn't get to opportunity to understand the duplicity and contradiction of a deeply flawed man now in the White House.
Once you have a lens to see how you're being manipulated by MSM, it starts to become clear what it is they (the Left) actually want (power) and to what levels of deceit they are willing to traverse.
Depeche Mode - "Just Can't Get Enough" (Official Video) directed by Clive RichardsonOriginal song from the 'Speak & Spell' album (Sire/Mute - 1981)Buy the 12...
Because those are the wrong things to do and neither side should do them frivolously.
Trump did not use the state to go after Hillary. On the other hand, the Left/Deep State has gone after everyone around Trump both while he was in office (Flynn, himself) and once out of office (Stone, Navarro, Bannon, now himself).
But, if the Left is going to go to the lowest common denominator, we must return the favor.
Trump was/is a threat to the establishment. The establishment (using MSM) whipped up the general public (TDS). The general public (still suffering from TDS) have been primed to hate Trump no matter what. All the while, Trump was trying to help the general public.
It's a shame that so many people (several in this thread) can't see through the messages that the MSM is constantly sending them.
But if Hillary was committing crimes (Adultintheroom has listed some, and there are other examples) why shouldn't she have been charged? Are you indicating she was innocent at that time?
Because the Special Prosecutor is still working the case. LOL
The Government Motion is Scribd linked in the article, for the mouth breathing liberals.
"Hard evidence, emails and text messages, showing the Clinton Campaign, Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie, Joffe, and the media were all synced in August of 2016..."
Kushner firm took hundreds of millions from Middle Eastern nations, but there's no corruption in the Trump administration, right? Who was Trump's point man on the Middle East? Jared Kushner. Why were he and Ivanka profiting off their political position while serving in the Trump administration? Could you possibly get a more corrupt president? This indictment is just the first in a lot of more significant cases against Trump for his actual crimes.
But if Hillary was committing crimes (Adultintheroom has listed some, and there are other examples) why shouldn't she have been charged? Are you indicating she was innocent at that time?
Because the Special Prosecutor is still working the case. LOL
The Government Motion is Scribd linked in the article, for the mouth breathing liberals.
This would have been a better response to my first question about why she wasn't charged during the Trump administration. Something something patience- Watergate took years and I'm sure Hunter's laptop will take years if there is anything there.
Kremlin's response seemed to indicate that she should not have been charged " Because those are the wrong things to do and neither side should do them frivolously. Trump did not use the state to go after Hillary."
I was trying to figure out why he thought then that Hillary should not have been charged- because she was innocent or because charging a political foe, if guilty, was wrong?
Even if Trump never made good on what he promised, just the fact that he says stuff like that is reason enough to give him a second term.
Joe Biden wants us all to take the Soma and go about our lives half-asleep while the Establishment fleeces the American workforce and taxpayer.
When Trump asked a simple question: "why are we sending all these countries all this money" - it again, sent shock waves through the Establishment because it had the potential to dislodge hundreds of billions of dollars of "foreign aid" that the Establishment wants to control so that they can filter it to their own people.
We end up paying for it: taxes now, taxes later, or inflation, and the Establishment finds a way to pocket it. Trumps saw this and would at least bring it into the public conversation.
Meanwhile, Biden and Nancy want to talk about ice cream and how they are such "pro-choice Catholics". The contrast could not be more clear. This scares people though.
This would have been a better response to my first question about why she wasn't charged during the Trump administration. Something something patience- Watergate took years and I'm sure Hunter's laptop will take years if there is anything there.
Kremlin's response seemed to indicate that she should not have been charged " Because those are the wrong things to do and neither side should do them frivolously. Trump did not use the state to go after Hillary."
I was trying to figure out why he thought then that Hillary should not have been charged- because she was innocent or because charging a political foe, if guilty, was wrong?
Fair enough. One can theorize that the ‘fight fire with fire’ is the potential of the Durham investigation. A sort of checkmate, if you will. The further the Dem’s go with their BS, the closer to legal D-Day against the DNC we get.
Again, that’s just a theory. But, the years of ‘Russia collusion!’ have back fired on the DNC and their media cohorts. We’re seeing Trump indicted for paying off a hooker. So much for the Russia BS.
Even if Trump never made good on what he promised, just the fact that he says stuff like that is reason enough to give him a second term.
Joe Biden wants us all to take the Soma and go about our lives half-asleep while the Establishment fleeces the American workforce and taxpayer.
When Trump asked a simple question: "why are we sending all these countries all this money" - it again, sent shock waves through the Establishment because it had the potential to dislodge hundreds of billions of dollars of "foreign aid" that the Establishment wants to control so that they can filter it to their own people.
We end up paying for it: taxes now, taxes later, or inflation, and the Establishment finds a way to pocket it. Trumps saw this and would at least bring it into the public conversation.
Meanwhile, Biden and Nancy want to talk about ice cream and how they are such "pro-choice Catholics". The contrast could not be more clear. This scares people though.
Agreed. Here’s another the Dem’s don’t want people to see.
1. [T]he years of ‘Russia collusion!’ have back fired on the DNC and their media cohorts.
2. We’re seeing Trump indicted for paying off a hooker.
3. So much for the Russia BS.
1. There was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian entities. People went to prison for that and for related crimes.
2. Saying that paying hush money is what President Trump was indicted for is a knowing falsehood (aka a lie). You already know what the potential charges might be, and why they'd be chosen. Come now, you're better than this.
3. If you're saying that thinking the Russians' interference in 2016affected the outcome is BS, I tend to agree. I think President Trump almost certainly would have won in 2016 regardless. (Full disclosure: I never vote Democratic.) If you're saying that the Mueller investigation was BS, I disagree. It sent multiple people to prison.
It is a totally unethical prosecution and the attorney Alvin Bragg will be defending his law license when the case is over. Its a no cash bail.
You left wingers were so butt hurt over Clinton losing what was to be one of the biggest landslide wins of all time. You've been devastated by Trump's victory for years. What Hillary did...you all looked the other way and were fine with it.
There are more people supporting him than any of you want to believe, a lot more. If Biden were even an average Democrat and didn't do half the crap he's pulled, things wouldn't be so bad.
But...if things do get bad, buckle up buttercups as it's gonna be a bunpy ride.Flat out cheating, which all liberals on this site deny, everyone of you, is one thing. The insanity going on right now has gone beyond batsh*t crazy and has gone to nuts at an exponential rate!
As someone said, the Bidenettes and Clintonettes with no brains aren't going to like 2024.
As for Trump, he's being railroaded and any unbiased person can see that. He's not spending any time in jail. Regardless, liberal lollipops just poked the bear...never a good idea.
Lol. Now the left has gone and done it. You can bet that 100% of conservatives will be voting next election. Ya’all Dems better get printing more dead people ballets.
It is quite entertaining to watch America eat itself… a regular digital civil war.
On one hand, you're right, this is a meaningless indictment that will only serve to rally conservatives. Abortion had the same effect for the left. Both sides keep making stupid, unpopular decisions that only serve to piss off the other side and more importantly, everyone in the middle who has to deal with this BS.
On the other hand, if you believe elections were rigged you are dumb as hell
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
