Exxxxxxxxcelllllllent!
Sherwen, actually.
I'm at work so I can't see and hear the live broadcast with Phil and Paul, so I'm force to listen to the fatuous remarks of Trautwig and endure a commercial blitz. Bob R. is okay but goes a bit too wacko now and then. I think Kirsten looks like she's wearing a wig.
It's so obvious you're an idiot. You probably just heard about the Tour de France when Lance won in 1999...just like the rest of the bozos who suddenly decide to follow the tour because there's an American winning.
Get a clue. Maybe if OLN talked about some of the other personalities in cylcing and less on the Lance Infomercial, then that may guarantee future coverage and interest in the sport when Lance retires. But you will not like the masses who will only creep out of the cracks when another American does well...Typical.
letour wrote:
In respect to American's dominating the Tour, you primarily used the arguement that "four out of the top nine in the overall standings are American". Apparently blinded by ambiguity and/or total idiocy, one would understand the reason for this placement. Therefore, I used the Team Trial rebute to argue against your statement. By suddenly throwing in histroical facts about previous American Tour riders, you are introducing a totally separate arugement which, ironically, does not help your cause......
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, BLAHHHHH.....
.
Now I know you spent hours with your thesaurus looking up "big" words (anything more than one syallable is big for you I am sure) to try and make a point, but it looks like this Tour is PROVING ME AND MY ASSERTION ( THAT US CYCLISTS ARE A FORCE ) CORRECT, ASSWIPE.
*I defended my statement first with the early standings in this year's tour where US cyclists were doing well, and you didn't like that. Fine,...
*I then defended my assertion by displaying US cyclists' recent performances in the Tour and other big races, and you didn't like THAT.
So I guess I will have to BRING OUT THE BIG GUNS on your sad little self. Read it and weep you arrogant 'oh-I-feel-so-smart-because-I-come-to-a-running-site-and-claim-extensive-cycling-knowledge' tool:
Pos. No. Name Nat. Team Time Gap
1 001 ARMSTRONG, Lance USA DSC 55:58:17.000 00:00:00.000
2 057 RASMUSSEN, Mickael DEN RAB 55:59:58.000 00:01:41.000
3 021 BASSO, Ivan ITA CSC 56:01:03.000 00:02:46.000
4 011 ULLRICH, Jan GER TMO 56:02:51.000 00:04:34.000
5 164 LEIPHEIMER, Levi USA GST 56:03:02.000 00:04:45.000
6 066 LANDIS, Floyd USA PHO 56:03:20.000 00:05:03.000
THREE IN THE TOP SIX OVERALL! Any other nations doing as well that far at the top of the overall classifications? No, I didn't think so. And if go further down and get to Julich, it would be 4 in the top 16. And what if Tyler was screwed over with that test??? (sure, a big "if", but even WEJO thought the results were questionable, and wejo doesn't doubt any drug test results). Then the USA might have FOUR IN THE TOP SEVEN right now.
So, in short, you lose this argument, just like every European cyclist has lost to Lance for the last 7 years. They got used to losing, I guess you will too.
Your news flash is absolutely hillarious, 100% on the money, and the best thing to come out of this tour apart from Vino's win on the Champs Elysees. Did you hear how Phil responded to that marionette Al Trautwig's question of what was his favorite Tour de France??? The Tour of '89, Greg's comeback victory. Now that Armstrong is gone let's hope some panache will come back to the Tour!
maple hardwood floor
prefinished hardwood floor installation
hardwood floor cleaning tip
cost of refinishing hardwood floor
bruce hardwood floor gun stock
And how does this effect Lance???