H8terade wrote:
Half of the stuff on this site is BS that's run by trollz. I still don't understand how a good 1500 converts to XC. An 8k is over 5 times the distance. Where is the corellation?
^very true. For example- if a guy whose really only run a good 1500, similar to some of the LAX guys, is considered someone relevant for cross, what about a guy like Sullivan, whose run pretty damn fast in the 1500? If I recall, he's an OK cross runner having run 2510s, but he has yet to make a national meet- and if hes one of the best 1500 guys, that doesn't bode well for the other "only" 1500 guys like kerska and peterson