asdfsafsd wrote:
Basketball shorts and a flojo suit?
Not a Flojo suit because they have 2 legs instead of 1.
I assume there will be variations in the shorts, bun huggers for women, etc.
asdfsafsd wrote:
Basketball shorts and a flojo suit?
Not a Flojo suit because they have 2 legs instead of 1.
I assume there will be variations in the shorts, bun huggers for women, etc.
dsfasfdsa wrote:
asdfsafsd wrote:Basketball shorts and a flojo suit?
Not a Flojo suit because they have 2 legs instead of 1.
I assume there will be variations in the shorts, bun huggers for women, etc.
And a more traditional singlet for distance guys.
And to the guy saying that the shorts are too big for distance runners... I guess you've never seen photos of Shorter at Munich!!
tunkcart wrote:
Supposedly, wearing red confers a statistically-significant advantage (at least when compared with blue). They studied some Olympic event or events where uniform colors were randomly assigned and found that wearing red had a marked impact
I recall reading something about red versus other colors during a sport event. Hmm...I wonder if it will help Tiger this weekend?
Am I the only one who finds it ironic, as we go into England and kick their butts wearing red, as they were the people who originally called the 'red coats'. Maybe this was done on purpose.
Nike=trolling on the world haha
Lumber Jill wrote:
You are right. Nike should start making crappier stuff like Puma.How dare Nike try to be innovative and make better product.
At the time, Roger Bannister was the fastest man in the world wearing these shoes:
http://zero-drop.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/sp7-e1293443495849.jpgWhy are people not wearing these anymore when the fastest person in the world wore them?
Hello , these are track spikes ! Drop the zero drop madness !
jogi low wrote:
tunkcart wrote:Supposedly, wearing red confers a statistically-significant advantage (at least when compared with blue). They studied some Olympic event or events where uniform colors were randomly assigned and found that wearing red had a marked impact.
Great uniform design. The more red, the better.
Yes. Very smart design.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/05/0518_050518_redsports.html
Nice theory, but I am skeptical. Their data set was "outcomes of one-on-one boxing, tae kwon do, Greco-Roman-wresting, and freestyle-wrestling matches at the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens, Greece" and Euro 2004 soccer. That's just not a big enough data set to isolate color.
For example, if I took an even larger data set of top 20 D1 college football for the last 50 years, I could probably get the same result because red is one of the colors for Ohio State, Alabama, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and USC. The idea that you could isolate color of uniform as a significant factor out of all of the factors that made these teams good is just implausible to me.
I like the Nike uniforms by the way even if I don't believe the theory.
