WI worker wrote:
I am a public employee in WI and have been for the last 6 years. When I graduated college 6 years ago it was very easy to get my position in a local government. I was the only person from my class out of school that took a public sector job, everyone considered the pay to be too low. An equivalent private sector job paid 10k-20k more than public, maybe 10k-15k when benefits were considered. People wanted to take a risk and pursue higher salaries in the private sector, which was fine. But bad economies hurt private industry more, everyone knew that but times were booming in 2004. Those private employees made a lot of cash before 2008, and now it is harder for them. Public vs private has it's advantages and disadvantages but people should recognize that and not blame the public employees for their secure jobs now, most of them could've had my job if they wanted.
Walker's bill stinks because even though my local government is not in financial trouble due to smart planning the last 3 years, we are prohibited by law from receiving wage increases. Even though it would be no money coming from the state. I'm not union, but I still oppose the bill.
I scoff at this "all public sector employees are over-paid".
Prior to 2008 my state had set up a commission on how to RETAIN employees. As it was, the only inducement to remain in public sector work was the pension (which employees contribute to).
I don't know any state where state retirees don't have to contribute to their retiree health insurance. In my state it is four times what a current employee contributes.