Breaking: FBI raiding Mar a Lardo!

Still pushing the Trump is a Russian agent nonsense despite years of investigations finding zero evidence.

Is it possible to get a list of any individuals that are agents of the "deep state"? I understand that the deep state is by definition hidden, but after 50 years of Republicans claiming everything that goes wrong or every accusation is a result of the deep state's actions, we would expect to have some names of people that have come to light. Especially since everything that occurs in Washington is leaked within minutes.

Any help here? Who are these shadowy Deep staters we keep hearing of from Q-Anon, infowars etc?

Trump is the same threat to US democracy as a certain German was to theirs in 1932.

They would not be very effective members of the Shadow Govt, the Deep State, whatever you want to call it if the general public had a list of their names now would they?

You still have doubts it exists?

You can however look up the people who donate tens of millions each year to the political process to get a good idea.

I would do so but would probably get banned

Anybody who knows the real government has no need to theorize about a shadow government. The billionaires are not in the shadows. Corporations are people.

I gotta ask…if you do things intentionally that are illegal or unconstitutional, like grant college tuition relief or not enforce immigration laws, aren’t you by definition a threat to democracy?

How about just one name then? No list. Just one name of real person?

You guys.
The NY Times. The FBI. The White House. The AP. Reuters The Clinton Crime Family. MSNBC. Reader’s Digest. Barron’s. Harvard Business Review. Inside Baseball. Le Monde. Hightlights Magazine. Adweek. Cat Fancy. Ebony. Soldier of Fortune. Parade Magazine. Yale Law Review. Car and Driver. Nature. National Geographics. Billboard. Al Jazeera. Voice of America. Frontline. The Economist. The National Review. Democracy Now. The Daily Worker. Dagens Nyheter. Slate. Thrasher. Foreign Relations. Purple. Guitar World. Penthouse. Crain’s Chicago Business. Architectural Digest. Variety. Model Railroader.

Folks, these are all a bunch of liars. Why would anyone believe them?

The *only* credible new sources today are the Falun Gong funded Epoch Times, Tucker Carlson, Gavin McInnes, Dinesh D'Souza and Jimmy Dore’s youtube channel.

What appears to be "illegal or unconstitutional" in this case appears to be your opinion - or that of Tucker Carlson. However, denying the results of a fair election and seeking to overthrow the legitimately elected government certainly qualifies as a threat to democracy. We now might add stealing state secrets and refusing to return them.

I didn’t cheer on no transparency. I pointed out that it’s a meaningless criticism when discussing a sealed probable cause affidavit for a search warrant. Its like criticizing the military for classifying certain documents as top secret and crying “where’s the transparency?!”

I didn’t cheer on lies, because you didn’t mention lies in the probable cause affidavit until now. And even now you haven’t identified what you think are lies, and it’s unlikely you will. “Lies” is just another cool sounding buzzword to you.

Just these three short posts: Post Nos. 3204, 3212, and 3218, illustrate what an ignorant, obtuse, confused and exaggerating liar you are.

Lol! That must be the internet equivalent of “I could tell you, but then I’d have to kill you.”

I had settled on the explanation that former guy was holding on to all these boxes of top secret/sensitive compartmented documents because this is someone who just likes to poke people in the eye and resents being told that he can't have or can't do something.

But could there be something more sinister here? Is it really possible that a former president could/would trade secrets for what..., money, power, influence? Is it possible that someone who lives by the mobster rule where snitches are thought of as being on the bottom rung would therefore have no moral qualms about trading that information away because well, its just snitches and they deserve whats coming to them anyway? When I see that Jay Bratt who is listed as Chief of the Counterintelligence & Export Control Section (CES) of the DOJ was the one who drafted the warrant I have to wonder if this is really where this is heading.

I don't recall the term "Deep State" being in popular usage until somewhere around the middle of Obam's second term. I think Hannity popularized it. Am I wrong? It's been used since the 70s?

Boxes of documents even came with Trump on foreign travel, following him to hotel rooms around the world — including countries considered foreign adversaries of the United States.

“There was no rhyme or reason — it was classified documents on top of newspapers on top of papers people printed out of things they wanted him to read. The boxes were never organized,” Grisham said. “He’d want to get work done on long trips so he’d just rummage through the boxes. That was our filing system.”

Stephanie Grisham, former White House Press Secretary

15 of those 16 conversations was about the Pee tape.

The 16th was about Minoxidil.

Peter Strzok.

No one with a shred of integrity or an IQ above room temperature would listen to a word that corrupt POS has to say about anything.

After Mark Zuckerberg casually admits that the FBI helped him rig the 2020 election the FBI covers its tracks by casually admitting that they, in fact, attack the first amendment all the time to help their preferred political candidates.

twitchy.com

NO big whoop … just the FBI admitting it ‘routinely’ violates the First Amendment after Zuckerberg bombshell

Sam Janney

So what does the FBI consider a threat, exactly?

Open link