Official Brett Kavanaugh confirmation thread

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

ure a tool2 wrote:

You can sit in the corner with the other tool and have a good cry....or rage...about it I guess.

No, I can laugh at your liberal fallacies while your heroes Clinton, Weinstein, Weiner, Ellison, Booker do what they do and did.

Hilarious. Especially the Booker reference. Who admitted in a book to sexually assaulting a woman. And Ellison has received no scrutiny whatever. But Republicans don't care about women? It's become self parody.

blokester1 wrote:

Hilarious. Especially the ....

Horizontal wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

"Sore losers, sore losers, STFU!" This is comedy gold

https://youtu.be/NxlrGDuk50o

I'm all for the process allowing for a lack of evidence to not derail this nomination, but this guy is a jack@ss. Who has enough free time to do this?

Someone who has all of 1:06 to spare.

Don McGahn stopped the FBI from a full Kavanaugh investigation, even after Trump said it would happen

“Tell the F.B.I. they can investigate anything, he told Mr. McGahn, because we need the critics to stop,” the NY Times reported.

McGahn convinced Trump that “a wide-ranging inquiry like some Democrats were demanding — and Mr. Trump was suggesting — would be disastrous for Kavanaugh’s confirmation process.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/05/us/politics/trump-kavanaugh-fbi.html

Trump will nominate another one soon wrote:

That half corpse 60lb sack of potatoes Ruth B Ginsberg will croak soon. (Today she couldn’t even remember what the 14th amendment was and was incoherent)

So soon after next month’s GOP red wave, our awesome fearless leader will be nominating a third Supreme Court judge.

That poor woman has to hang on for dear life. I feel bad for her. If you think Kavanaugh is bad, you haven’t seen anything yet if she retires....

zxcvzxcv wrote:

In most rapes, it is a he said-she said matter. What we do know is that Kavanaugh lied repeatedly during this and his previous confirmation hearings. Judges literally assert that if a witness lies in one part of testimony, all of it can be disregarded.

What exactly can you prove he lied about? Nothing.

What does that confirmation tell me?

Our votes as citizens are worthless,

"So werde ich wieder nie stimmen!"

gloria wrote:

What does that confirmation tell me?

Our votes as citizens are worthless,

"So werde ich wieder nie stimmen!"

Okay, please stay home next election then.

I vote absentee ballot. But

it'll go into the shredder, but thanks

for the comment flat fish.

It tells you a large percentage of citizens disagrees with your political outlook. I know you still can’t accept the fact that Hillary lost what you thought was a slam dunk, but the process worked as it always has. You may not like Kavanaugh but you have Feinstein to blame. The saying, “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” is apropos. She decided to play a power game from a position of weakness and got steamrolled. It may well be the case that we are all worse off for it.

gloria wrote:

What does that confirmation tell me?

Our votes as citizens are worthless,

"So werde ich wieder nie stimmen!"

The dems (coons, specifically) gave the republicans a huge assist in getting the nomination through. The FBI probe gave several republicans and Manchin political cover to vote yes. Without the FBI investigation, I think Collins would have been a “no” and probably Flake too. Manchin would have voted no as well...

Chew on this wrote:

The dems (coons, specifically) gave the republicans a huge assist in getting the nomination through. The FBI probe gave several republicans and Manchin political cover to vote yes. Without the FBI investigation, I think Collins would have been a “no” and probably Flake too. Manchin would have voted no as well...

So why didn’t the FBI interview those who corroborate Ford’s account?

Rich or time poor 1:06 isn't a big deal. wrote:

Horizontal wrote:

I'm all for the process allowing for a lack of evidence to not derail this nomination, but this guy is a jack@ss. Who has enough free time to do this?

Someone who has all of 1:06 to spare.

Wow, so by your estimation, this guy spent only the length of the video trying to be a douche for this? I'm guessing you're super bright.

That dude wasn't there in 1982. She didn't name Kavanaugh to him in 2016, only late summer 2018 after AK announced retirement. What would it mean if they did interview him?

gloria wrote:

What does that confirmation tell me?

Our votes as citizens are worthless,

"So werde ich wieder nie stimmen!"

Quite the opposite. The extreme opposite. Electing Trump impacted the selection of two SCOTUS judges and counting. 124 million people voted or so. What do your think your one vote was going to do? It’s a collective thing. It’s not all about you. You are not special.

gloria wrote:

I vote absentee ballot. But

it'll go into the shredder, but thanks

for the comment flat fish.

Weird?

Liberal Losers wrote:

Okay, please stay home next election then.

^ The fear of losing

Or maybe... wrote:

It tells you a large percentage of citizens disagrees with your political outlook.

25% is a small percentage. Not a large percentage.

Runningart2004 wrote:

So why didn’t the FBI interview those who corroborate Ford’s account?

Because it was rigged.