because Trump has committed umpteen prosecutable and impeachable crimes and dems haven't. Pretty simple.
Trump are also foaming at the mouth about the Steele dossier, while giving Trump a pass on all of the political opposition dossiers he collected, and the ones he created (blackmail dossiers) while president.
because Trump has committed umpteen prosecutable and impeachable crimes and dems haven't. Pretty simple.
What does that have to do with charging Hillary? No one from the GOP ever charged her with a crime. Trump and the GOP had the power positions to do that after the 2016 election.
Split the country, for the love of god! The leftists will NEVER stop until they destroy the whole thing while us REAL Americans in the Midwest and South still believe in the Constitution and rule of law. Northeasterners and West Coasters, split away and we'll let you go without any friction. Sadly, the evil forces that have taken over America won't allow this to happen peacefully.
Globalization is a threat to the values that differentiate real Americans from the rest of our sick and twisted society. America would be better off as several countries.
because Trump has committed umpteen prosecutable and impeachable crimes and dems haven't. Pretty simple.
What does that have to do with charging Hillary? No one from the GOP ever charged her with a crime. Trump and the GOP had the power positions to do that after the 2016 election.
is your argument 'agreed HRC committed no prosecutable crimes so the GOP should have made up something and charged her with it?" because that sure sounds like what you are saying.
Split the country, for the love of god! The leftists will NEVER stop until they destroy the whole thing while us REAL Americans in the Midwest and South still believe in the Constitution and rule of law. Northeasterners and West Coasters, split away and we'll let you go without any friction. Sadly, the evil forces that have taken over America won't allow this to happen peacefully.
Why should we let left wing radicals have anything? You run away and break off, and they'll be at your door in no time. No. The entire country needs to be one, and under sane rule.
Hillary committed the same "crime" and was fined for it. She hid the fact that her campaign funded the fake dossier that started all this.
WRONG. Billionaire Republican, Paul Singer, started all this. It is called "opposition research" by the politicians who use the information. Singer started it because he did not want Trump to be the GOP nominee.
Trump has remarked that he'd would accept "information" (opposition research) offered by a foreign government for use in his reelection. "If somebody called from a country — Norway — 'We have information on your opponent' — oh, I think I’d want to hear it," Trump told George Stephanopoulos, which is why he had Don Jr. meet with Russians to get some "dirt" on Clinton. While president, Trump amassed a lot of "opposition research" on people, not just opponents, such as, getting the tax returns of his staff members to see if there was anything he could use against them to keep them quiet, like Wilbur Ross.
because Trump has committed umpteen prosecutable and impeachable crimes and dems haven't. Pretty simple.
What does that have to do with charging Hillary? No one from the GOP ever charged her with a crime. Trump and the GOP had the power positions to do that after the 2016 election.
The current version of the GQP-Trumpism- have no interest in governance.
Why? Because there are enough idiots that vote for them simply because they are willing to wage cultural wars. They are able to obtain their positions of power without ever having to accomplish anything save 'Show the libs'. Remember a large portion of these people think Obama was POTUS on 9/11/01.
In the case of Cankles - it was more valuable to wage PR/Social media war against her then actually take action against her.
WRONG. Billionaire Republican, Paul Singer, started all this. It is called "opposition research" by the politicians who use the information. Singer started it because he did not want Trump to be the GOP nominee.
Trump has remarked that he'd would accept "information" (opposition research) offered by a foreign government for use in his reelection. "If somebody called from a country — Norway — 'We have information on your opponent' — oh, I think I’d want to hear it," Trump told George Stephanopoulos, which is why he had Don Jr. meet with Russians to get some "dirt" on Clinton. While president, Trump amassed a lot of "opposition research" on people, not just opponents, such as, getting the tax returns of his staff members to see if there was anything he could use against them to keep them quiet, like Wilbur Ross.
is your argument 'agreed HRC committed no prosecutable crimes so the GOP should have made up something and charged her with it?" because that sure sounds like what you are saying.
First of all, don't play stupid like Hillary is some goody goody two shoes. But the point here not democrats. It's republicans. If they really think Hillary is a crook , then they could have charged her. I'm talking to c(_)ck republicans here. Not you.
Instead , they are all too glad to say how they don't go after political enemies with the force of power when they hold power. They brag about being inept and weak. I'm watching mainstream conservatives announcing that they didn't go after so and so democrat, so the dems need to reciprocate and knock it off with the trump charges. Literally begging the enemy.
I expect democrats to do everything possible. Whether its legit charges, or even make up charges if they have to just to derail Republicans for the time being. Dems play to win.
Just because I despise the Democrat platform, I can identify they are a party that plays to win. The GOP are useless to me and every person who opposes the Dems.
WRONG. Billionaire Republican, Paul Singer, started all this. It is called "opposition research" by the politicians who use the information. Singer started it because he did not want Trump to be the GOP nominee.
Trump has remarked that he'd would accept "information" (opposition research) offered by a foreign government for use in his reelection. "If somebody called from a country — Norway — 'We have information on your opponent' — oh, I think I’d want to hear it," Trump told George Stephanopoulos, which is why he had Don Jr. meet with Russians to get some "dirt" on Clinton. While president, Trump amassed a lot of "opposition research" on people, not just opponents, such as, getting the tax returns of his staff members to see if there was anything he could use against them to keep them quiet, like Wilbur Ross.
nah the HRC campaign funded steele at some point and miscategorized the fee to be 'legal fees.' The HRC campaign had to pay a fine because of that.
Nah? He said Paul Singer started all this, and provided a link. That has nothing to do with Clinton providing funding for it.
It appears that a "private" person, like Singer, can pay for political "oppo research" and give that information to politicians. It is legal as long politicians don't pay for it ... directly (bills favoring the funder of the oppo research are perfectly acceptable ways to indirectly pay for Steele-type dossiers).
Globalization is a threat to the values that differentiate real Americans from the rest of our sick and twisted society. America would be better off as several countries.
That's true actually . . . IF you are pro-dictatorship, anti-freedom, anti-free markets, and anti-democracy.
Who exactly do you think would be the leader of the world if the US got broken apart into several, relatively insignificant countries? I'll give you a few hints:
It would not be a country in Europe, Africa or the Americas
It would be one of the two most populous countries in the world.
The name of the current leader of this country has a name that starts with Xi Jinpin
Can you guess?
Now, what characteristics do you think this country has? Again, I'll give you some hints:
Communist
Dictatorship
Zero freedom of speech
Zero freedom of religion
Zero freedom of the press
Zero freedom of access to information on the Internet
Your error had to be fixed. Stop foaming at the mouth, thanks.
I personally hope he gets convincted. He deserves it for not building that wall, and not deporting dreamers, letting BLM riot, and failing to ban anchor babies.
Give me a break. You inbred hick losers are the dregs of the country. Your lord and savior Trump agrees. Don't forget to send him money for his legal defense, sucker!
Let us go then if we are bringing you down. I dare you!
nah the HRC campaign funded steele at some point and miscategorized the fee to be 'legal fees.' The HRC campaign had to pay a fine because of that.
Nah? He said Paul Singer started all this, and provided a link. That has nothing to do with Clinton providing funding for it.
It appears that a "private" person, like Singer, can pay for political "oppo research" and give that information to politicians. It is legal as long politicians don't pay for it ... directly (bills favoring the funder of the oppo research are perfectly acceptable ways to indirectly pay for Steele-type dossiers).
this is getting above my paygrade but I think you are missing the essential fact that the HRC campaign DID pay for at least some portion of the steele dossier. And then hid that payment.
And as an aside, if singer paid for the whole thing and gave it to the HRC campaign, that has to be documented as a campaign donation.
Give me a break. You inbred hick losers are the dregs of the country. Your lord and savior Trump agrees. Don't forget to send him money for his legal defense, sucker!
Let us go then if we are bringing you down. I dare you!
Globalization is a threat to the values that differentiate real Americans from the rest of our sick and twisted society. America would be better off as several countries.
That's true actually . . . IF you are pro-dictatorship, anti-freedom, anti-free markets, and anti-democracy.
Who exactly do you think would be the leader of the world if the US got broken apart into several, relatively insignificant countries? I'll give you a few hints:
It would not be a country in Europe, Africa or the Americas
It would be one of the two most populous countries in the world.
The name of the current leader of this country has a name that starts with Xi Jinpin
Can you guess?
Now, what characteristics do you think this country has? Again, I'll give you some hints:
Communist
Dictatorship
Zero freedom of speech
Zero freedom of religion
Zero freedom of the press
Zero freedom of access to information on the Internet
Forced abortion
Zero right to bear arms
Sound like your kind of place?
Have you been paying attention at all how every President has been behaving with regards to China since Nixon (other than Trump) ??? Biden is actively weakening America every day, allowing China to leap forward at record pace with recent deals they've made with Russia and Brazil. They'll all be trading goods in Chinese money now thanks to the DC Deep State. I'd rather have half of the country formerly known as the USA fighting the good fight than the DC Deep State destroying ALL our power as they are actively doing. One-World Govt plan that DC is all on board for means a weak 1st World and an extremely strong and cohesive Communist block.
Give me a break. You inbred hick losers are the dregs of the country. Your lord and savior Trump agrees. Don't forget to send him money for his legal defense, sucker!
Let us go then if we are bringing you down. I dare you!
“Let you go”?? You do realize that those states you’re referring to bankroll the other states with taxpayer dollars. Yes, the irony is that states who whine about the federal government taking away their hard earned money are actually taker states. Your split country utopia wouldn’t last a day before anarchy breaks out.
is your argument 'agreed HRC committed no prosecutable crimes so the GOP should have made up something and charged her with it?" because that sure sounds like what you are saying.
First of all, don't play stupid like Hillary is some goody goody two shoes. But the point here not democrats. It's republicans. If they really think Hillary is a crook , then they could have charged her. I'm talking to c(_)ck republicans here. Not you.
Instead , they are all too glad to say how they don't go after political enemies with the force of power when they hold power. They brag about being inept and weak. I'm watching mainstream conservatives announcing that they didn't go after so and so democrat, so the dems need to reciprocate and knock it off with the trump charges. Literally begging the enemy.
I expect democrats to do everything possible. Whether its legit charges, or even make up charges if they have to just to derail Republicans for the time being. Dems play to win.
Just because I despise the Democrat platform, I can identify they are a party that plays to win. The GOP are useless to me and every person who opposes the Dems.
"Begging the enemy" - you mean your fellow Americans? You all get defensive and all "America is the greatest country in the world" when the rest of the world hates on Americans, but the truth is, nobody hates Americans as much as other Americans. The hatred you have created against other humans, who happen to be American, based on who they vote for - it should cause you to feel shame. That's who you you are? But no - you are a country filled with hate.
And, if your hate didn't blind you and instead you took time to notice, some politicians foster and use that hate to their advantage to gain power. They play into your hate, and you drink it up and spew it out.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.