Breaking: FBI raiding Mar a Lardo!

Objection! Asked and goddam, answered, counsel. Twenty pages ago. The witness is not required to repeat himself, just because you aren't paying attention. I will refer you to the timeline of events previously entered into evidence. If you have any questions pertinent to the timeline of events, the witness will answer them. Otherwise, take your rhetorical, redundant questions and raffle your goddam doughnuts!

Silver offered you the opportunity to have a serious discussion/debate the other day and you sh!t the bed. You cowardly ran away.

Since the you’ve been triggered, singling Silver out with dumb cartoons and stupid opinions pieces. If anyone is angry and triggered it’s is you. It’s becoming an unhealthy obsession for you.

You are projecting, Ghost. I didn't start this thread and I'm not one of the main contributors. I have repeatedly written that I while Trump brought this on himself, I will not pre-judge whether he is guilty of a crime or will be charged. And while several people on both sides have expressed anger in this thread, I have not. I'm unsure while you think you can provoke my anger with your reference to someone's opinion.

I tried to have a discussion with you days ago, and you demurred and tossed off some insults, so your intent by inviting me to anger is unclear. But clearly your powers of discernment have failed you if you think Salvo's opinion will do it. If the thread dies, it's OK by me. Investigations like this tend to take a long time, and not much will happen for a while except Trump trying to find an attorney who knows what needs to be done.

Nope, just right wingers being right wingers. Nothing more, nothing less

Jared Kushner denied he was the rat, tonight on Fox. That kid is a slimy, two-faced little sh!tstereenie, but I'm kind of believing him. I can't see him ratting out his own father-in-law, a generous man who has been so incredibly kind to him. Trump schooled Kushner all those years that Kushner was his driver, taught him the ropes, introduced him to the highest and classiest people our great country has to offer, and showered him in cold, hard cash and other liquid equities. Plus Kushner would never want to be on Trump's Smash List. People on that list don't end up happy. It probably wasn't Kushner.

Trump is going to have to find this rat soon -- every day that rat exists, Trump's enterprise is closer to collapsing like a Hong Kong stinkhole.

Like you have? I wasn't the one to make the claim that I didn't care what others said.

and? Somehow this means Trump isn't guilty of the crimes he committed? If your defense of a crime is that someone else committed another crime but wasn't prosecuted, then you better start getting measured for that orange jumpsuit.

Well, not sure what world you live in but typically the bad guys get the hate.

WaPo is reporting that trump lawyers agreed that Spanks had to give back the stolen goods so Trump gave them back, right? OH HELLS TO THE NO! Trump don't need no stinkin' laws!

Seriously, it's a very bad fact for the GOP that Trump's lawyer agreed Trump was breaking the law. But 'conservatives' only care about laws when Dems break them, not rich white guys. They actively like rich guy criminals. Seek them out. Praise them. Give them more money.

WaPo:

About two dozen boxes of presidential records stored in then-President Donald Trump’s White House residence were not returned to the National Archives and Records Administration in the final days of his term even after Archives officials were told by a Trump lawyer that the documents should be given back, according to an email from the top lawyer at the record-keeping agency.

“It is also our understanding that roughly two dozen boxes of original presidential records were kept in the Residence of the White House over the course of President Trump’s last year in office and have not been transferred to NARA, despite a determination by Pat Cipollone in the final days of the administration that they need to be,” wrote Gary Stern, the agency’s chief counsel, in an email to Trump lawyers in May 2021, according to a copy reviewed by The Washington Post.

Former Rolling Stone editor Matt Taibbi is one of the few Democrats who isn't 24/7 consumed with TDS. As such he's able to see this situation clearly:

"Excuse me for giving a damn, but what happened to the Trump raid story?
Two weeks ago, the FBI raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home was the biggest story on earth and seemingly one of the most consequential American news events since 9/11. The search inspired a few hours of social media jubilation, followed by roughly a week of frenzied leaking as a parade of national security soothsayers unspooled sinister scenarios on TV, and then — nothing. The line went dead. By last week’s end, the cancellation of Brian Stelter on CNN was a top national headline in comparison.
With a caveat that the relative quiet could be upended by a court decision Thursday, could we pause to reflect on the oddness of this episode? Has a story this big ever receded to the back pages this quickly?
Once the FBI finished searching, everyone from Andrew Cuomo to the New Yorker to Mother Jones to George Will at the Washington Post pointed out the obvious, that the Justice Department needed to quickly produce an explanation, if not an indictment, to avoid the disaster of allowing the perception of a politicized raid to fester.
[…]
In sum: Joe Biden didn’t know the raid was coming, Merrick Garland blamed Trump for the raid becoming public at all and took three days to take responsibility for ordering it, and Trump’s crime has moved from mishandling “nuclear documents” to keeping “Sensitive Compartmented Information,” whose possession by Trump poses “exceptionally grave” risk to the United States.
Something about all this stinks. On one hand, we’re in the same place we’ve been a hundred times in the Trump era, waiting for the big reveal. We were here before Michael Cohen’s testimony, before the Mueller report, before the Ukraine whistleblower letter, the Barr memo, and countless other expected bombshells.
On the other hand, the evidentiary hype train has been turned off early this time. The deadline for more news out of Reinhart’s court about what’s inside the affidavit is this Thursday, when Garland is supposed to submit his proposed redactions, yet the story is getting more coverage on Fox (Gutfield! incredibly surged to the top of late-night comedy ratings after the raid) than in mainstream press, which appears to be tiptoeing back from the case much as administration officials did in the first week.
[…]
Unless Garland and the Biden administration give a clear idea of what exactly precipitated the Trump raid — whether it involved Trump funneling the names of spies to Putin, leaving launch codes out on a pizza box, whatever — Trump is going to continue to hammer this issue. Unless the man is literally in manacles before November 2024, this mess will remain an open wound for Democrats. Even if the raid wasn’t politically motivated, it will for sure continue to look politically motivated, if the Justice Department doesn’t come up with a better explanation than the six or seven leaked so far. Yet everyone is acting like that question has been answered."

The raid is the lead story in the Washington MF Post today, and the NYT has a story on its main page too.

So nah, it's a big story and people care a lot about the GOP's defense of the indefensible and putting party over country AGAIN by defending Trump's anti-American misdeeds.

Nice to you see you made it 4 sentences in before becoming overwhelmed.

It's in the paper today because today's the day they decide to redact 99% of the affadavit before releasing it.

Sounds just like Obama and Hillary. Yes, liberals only care about laws when Republican break them, not black Presidents or they'll cry race. Or a female ex-Senator who stole repeatedly and is married to a former President who was impeached. Yeah, you're kinda dumb agip.

Yes. agip is the 2nd dumbest liberal on this entire site. He lovesssssss to Cherry Pick garbage.

and apparently today trump is on full meltdown about the raid on his fake twitter website.

So yeah it's a big story.

Well if the pedophile Rick Wilson says it's a meltdown you can be absolutely certain it's not actually a meltdown.

You called Sam Harris a Democrat as well. You have some weird and childish desire to make everything binary to suit your views.

If you read Taibbi (and Harris), which I highly doubt you ever have or will, you would understand that neither one holds what most consider "Democrat" views.

Trump is not a conservative, by the way. Anti-military, pro-big government entitlement spending, trashes Republican politicians, pardons felons in prison, has friendly relationships with America's enemies (ala Jane Fonda), believes the law is malleable, disagrees with American exceptionalism, pro-Evil Empire, negotiates with terrorists, etc.