Some of you same 6-8 folks really need therapy. No one can be this volatile about something they have zero control over..do not come close to knowing all the facts, and are so set in their positions there is NO allowing for normal discussion.
God Bless America!!
You got it bro.
I will post this to stir the pot; good for a couple of hours.
Why would anyone believe the former liar in chief? The idiot was caught red handed with top secret documents at his house. After he was asked for months to return. Ignored a subpoena. Then the warrant was issued. Guilty as hell. Clear case of lying and obstruction of justice again.
TRUMP ERA DEFINED: In just 4 years, Trump gave us the Russia investigation; emboldened white supremacists; separated 5,000+ children from their families; cha...
Why would anyone believe the former liar in chief? The idiot was caught red handed with top secret documents at his house. After he was asked for months to return. Ignored a subpoena. Then the warrant was issued. Guilty as hell. Clear case of lying and obstruction of justice again.
Some of you same 6-8 folks really need therapy. No one can be this volatile about something they have zero control over..do not come close to knowing all the facts, and are so set in their positions there is NO allowing for normal discussion.
God Bless America!!
Kinda but not really.
This thread is a like a Mosh Pit - you expect obnoxious and aggressive behavior but there's always that one guy(Adult) with a mullet still wearing acid washed jeans, high tops and a tank top with an iron on decal that wants to actually fight everyone.
Why would anyone believe the former liar in chief? The idiot was caught red handed with top secret documents at his house. After he was asked for months to return. Ignored a subpoena. Then the warrant was issued. Guilty as hell. Clear case of lying and obstruction of justice again.
Same as Obama, but you believed him;). I know you're not too bright, but are you just plain stupid? They wouldn't issue the same thing to Obama...who still has the documents...and you fluffed right over that. Liberals are lying cherry pickers, which is why this thread just goes back and forth. Not a shred of honesty in any of you.
Sad lie. Obama doesn't and never had possession of them. You are a victim of unsavory characters manipulating you with false information.
The Biden administration authorized the FBI to scrutinize 15 boxes containing classified information that the National Archives retrieved from Mar-a-Lago earlier this year.
You posted this: "Biden lied and said he had nothing to do with the raid when the document proves he gave permission for it."
By "raid" you meant the execution of the search warrant on Mar-El-Hez in August 11, 2022.
By "the document" you meant the May 11, 2022 letter that you cited earlier.
By "proves" you meant at least some evidence In the May 11, 2022 letter tending to show some probability that your assertion regarding "lied" and "permission" is true.
By "permission for it" you meant permission for the execution of the search warrant on Mar-El-Hez in August 11, 2022.
"The document" doesn't "prove" "permission" for a "raid" or jack. It is factually, chronologically, and metaphysically impossible for "the document" to "prove" that Biden gave permission for the "raid" when "the document" is dated May 11, 2022 and the "raid" was on August 11, 2022 and there is no "permission," "raid," or "search warrant" mentioned in "the document." No one on earth on or before May 11, 2022 knew about a raid or a search warrant in August 2022.
I'm a guy on the internet who can (1) read cases about executive privilege and what it applies to, (2) become cognizant of the fact that no former president in the history of the US has ever made a claim of executive privilege against the current president, and (3) read the discussion in the May 11, 2022 letter that YOU cited, in particular the discussion regarding the fact that this is a claim of executive privilege over INTRA-agency sharing of documents that one agency already has, and (4) become aware that Trump delayed assertion of his claim to executive privilege over these documents for weeks and appears to have dropped it. Right? He has dropped the claim as to these documents, right?
Are you seriously this dumb or are you just being dishonest?
Jesus god almighty Christ . . . .
You posted this: "Biden lied and said he had nothing to do with the raid when the document proves he gave permission for it."
"The document" you are referring to is the May 11, 2022 letter you cited earlier. NOTE your words above, which are bolded for your attention. "The document" does not mention the word "raid," "search warrant," "permission," "authorization," "go for it" or any similar words. "The document" is dated May 11, 2022 which is three (3) months before the "raid" and long before anyone knew there would be such a raid. "The document" provides ZERO evidence that Biden ever gave permission for any raid or search warrant. "The document" does not "prove" anything you say it does in your assertion that I quoted above. "The document" does not mention Biden giving "permission for it." You are either very confused or deliberately misleading and lying.
Adult Liar wrote:
Giving the NARA the latitude to revoke executive privilege literally created the the "crime" that justified the warrant that was the basis for the raid.
That quoted sentence is so absurd, it's tough to break it down. Executive privilege doesn't get revoked. It gets waived. Waiving executive privilege cannot create a crime. It could reveal or expose a crime (see Nixon), but it cannot create one. That is a demented and illogical assertion by you showing that you can't grasp basic legal concepts. In any case, there is no evidence that waiver of the executive privilege, which was absolutely within the right of the Executive branch and necessary given the circumstances (former president stonewalling review of classified documents), exposed any crime that wasn't already exposed. It merely allowed the agency that investigates such crimes to review the same information that another federal agency that noticed the crime was already reviewing.
Adult Liar wrote:
Biden claimed he didn't know about any of it. He lied.
No. No, he did not claim he "didn't know any of it." Biden claimed he was not informed of the raid on Mar-O-Slamo beforehand, or the request for a search warrant or the probable cause affidavit. Nothing in the May 11, 2022 letter, which was three (3) months before the raid, contradicts that. You have not posted any evidence at all that Biden lied when he said he was not informed of the raid beforehand. None.
Why would anyone believe the former liar in chief? The idiot was caught red handed with top secret documents at his house. After he was asked for months to return. Ignored a subpoena. Then the warrant was issued. Guilty as hell. Clear case of lying and obstruction of justice again.
Same as Obama, but you believed him;). I know you're not too bright, but are you just plain stupid? They wouldn't issue the same thing to Obama...who still has the documents...and you fluffed right over that. Liberals are lying cherry pickers, which is why this thread just goes back and forth. Not a shred of honesty in any of you.
You are more of an idiot than trump or his lying buddies.
So instead of talking s***....prove that President Obama has top secret documents at his home.
The story of Trump and his manipulated cult consists of an amazingly level of irony and hypocrisy.
(1) He certainly got his cult excited with the chants of lock her up over Hillary's emails. But Trump's purposeful mishandling of highly classified documents is so egregious and so potentially damaging to this country that Hillary's emails pale in comparison. The cult is not at all bothered by that type of behavior now that Trump is doing it and the past lock her up chant is pretty ironic right? Also, Trump used his private phone and its not even mentioned.
(2) The country and the cult got so worked up and angry by Trump convincing them that the democrats cheated over numerous states and stole the election. But who really cheated. Who had numerous people in different states falsely signing documents to try and pass themselves as real electors? That is real cheating, organized cheating, and is rather ironic coming from the Trump camp after all there accusations. (Can you imagine how the cult would react if Biden had people pretend they were electors to get Biden elected?)
(3) Trump got his cult all excited about building a wall the he promised Mexico would pay for. Of course it didn't happen but many of his loyal followers believed in Trump and donated their own money to Bannon to help build that wall. Bannon was arrested because he stole this money from Trump's most loyal followers. Trump was OK with the stealing from his people and pardoned him. Were the Trump loyalist angry at Bannon, no, they forgave him......because Trump pardoned him?
(4) How about all that nonsense of the deep state organizing against Trump? But who demanded total loyalty from a variety of different agencies including the DA's, politicians, election officials, had the heritage group research and select the best conservative supreme court justices, who has amazingly close ties with Fox News pundits. It was Trump that had the deep state.
(5) Trump was seen hugging and kissing the flag to show his love of the country and democracy. Yet he was more than OK with the attack on our capital.
(6) Trump ran on a platform of cleaning out the swamp. (I don't need to explain that one.) That is very ironic.
(7) Trump has his cult believe that every that everything the mainstream media reports is all fake news. The president who has told more lies than anyone, who stole from his own charity, who conned students in going to a fake university has so many thinking he is telling the truth and the media lies? But they do.
Trump is a gifted conman who has taken advantage of the people most loyal to him. They honestly believe in him. He is a danger to this country.
Other than the incorrect and misleading headline (a common media trick), that article doesn't say what you think it does. It's discussing the contents of the May 11, 2022 letter that AdultInRoom has been confused about all day. See above.
Just to help you out: don't cite anything about the May 11, 2022 sent letter to Trump's lawyers. It does NOT help you in your efforts to defend Trump. It's all bad news. When the May 11, 2022 letter comes up, change the topic to corrupt judges or fake affidavits and stuff like that.
Are you seriously this dumb or are you just being dishonest?
Jesus god almighty Christ . . . .
You posted this: "Biden lied and said he had nothing to do with the raid when the document proves he gave permission for it."
"The document" you are referring to is the May 11, 2022 letter you cited earlier. NOTE your words above, which are bolded for your attention. "The document" does not mention the word "raid," "search warrant," "permission," "authorization," "go for it" or any similar words. "The document" is dated May 11, 2022 which is three (3) months before the "raid" and long before anyone knew there would be such a raid. "The document" provides ZERO evidence that Biden ever gave permission for any raid or search warrant. "The document" does not "prove" anything you say it does in your assertion that I quoted above. "The document" does not mention Biden giving "permission for it." You are either very confused or deliberately misleading and lying.
Adult Liar wrote:
Giving the NARA the latitude to revoke executive privilege literally created the the "crime" that justified the warrant that was the basis for the raid.
That quoted sentence is so absurd, it's tough to break it down. Executive privilege doesn't get revoked. It gets waived. Waiving executive privilege cannot create a crime. It could reveal or expose a crime (see Nixon), but it cannot create one. That is a demented and illogical assertion by you showing that you can't grasp basic legal concepts. In any case, there is no evidence that waiver of the executive privilege, which was absolutely within the right of the Executive branch and necessary given the circumstances (former president stonewalling review of classified documents), exposed any crime that wasn't already exposed. It merely allowed the agency that investigates such crimes to review the same information that another federal agency that noticed the crime was already reviewing.
Adult Liar wrote:
Biden claimed he didn't know about any of it. He lied.
No. No, he did not claim he "didn't know any of it." Biden claimed he was not informed of the raid on Mar-O-Slamo beforehand, or the request for a search warrant or the probable cause affidavit. Nothing in the May 11, 2022 letter, which was three (3) months before the raid, contradicts that. You have not posted any evidence at all that Biden lied when he said he was not informed of the raid beforehand. None.
I really can't believe you're tripling down on this idiocy...
A jury convicted two men of conspiring to kidnap Michigan's governor in 2020 in a plot prosecutors described as a rallying cry for a U.S. civil war by anti-government extremists.
You posted this: "Biden lied and said he had nothing to do with the raid when the document proves he gave permission for it."
"The document" you are referring to is the May 11, 2022 letter you cited earlier. NOTE your words above, which are bolded for your attention. "The document" does not mention the word "raid," "search warrant," "permission," "authorization," "go for it" or any similar words. "The document" is dated May 11, 2022 which is three (3) months before the "raid" and long before anyone knew there would be such a raid. "The document" provides ZERO evidence that Biden ever gave permission for any raid or search warrant. "The document" does not "prove" anything you say it does in your assertion that I quoted above. "The document" does not mention Biden giving "permission for it." You are either very confused or deliberately misleading and lying.
That quoted sentence is so absurd, it's tough to break it down. Executive privilege doesn't get revoked. It gets waived. Waiving executive privilege cannot create a crime. It could reveal or expose a crime (see Nixon), but it cannot create one. That is a demented and illogical assertion by you showing that you can't grasp basic legal concepts. In any case, there is no evidence that waiver of the executive privilege, which was absolutely within the right of the Executive branch and necessary given the circumstances (former president stonewalling review of classified documents), exposed any crime that wasn't already exposed. It merely allowed the agency that investigates such crimes to review the same information that another federal agency that noticed the crime was already reviewing.
No. No, he did not claim he "didn't know any of it." Biden claimed he was not informed of the raid on Mar-O-Slamo beforehand, or the request for a search warrant or the probable cause affidavit. Nothing in the May 11, 2022 letter, which was three (3) months before the raid, contradicts that. You have not posted any evidence at all that Biden lied when he said he was not informed of the raid beforehand. None.
I really can't believe you're tripling down on this idiocy...
Really? I can't imagine anyone in my position not tripling down. I've got your own assertions completely contradicted by your own article. You set yourself up to look like an liar and/or idiot multiple times. Who amongst us could resist taking the easy shots? I mean who am I, goddam Mother Teresa from Bombay Beach? The whole golden rule "walk a mile in my sandals" thing? Is that what you are invoking? Jesus Christ man, you tape a goddam "Punch Me" sign to your neck and expect people not to take a crack at you? Jesus Christ.
You might break the letsrun record for most posts in one day - keep it up, everyone is cheering you on!
You did it!!!!!!! 🥳🥳🥳🥳
75 posts in one day!!!!
We are so proud!!!!
Nope. A thread, some 5-7 years ago, about Mo Farah being caught with his hand in the doping jar generated over 300 comments in under 4 hours during U.S. working hours. The flood of thread defending Farah were coming from his UK PR firm (Freud Communications ... aka Freuds), which specializes in internet PR (trolling), worked late that day (UK time) denying everything.
I cannot find the thread on LRC, maybe someone else can ... meanwhile ...
I really can't believe you're tripling down on this idiocy...
Really? I can't imagine anyone in my position not tripling down. I've got your own assertions completely contradicted by your own article. You set yourself up to look like an liar and/or idiot multiple times. Who amongst us could resist taking the easy shots? I mean who am I, goddam Mother Teresa from Bombay Beach? The whole golden rule "walk a mile in my sandals" thing? Is that what you are invoking? Jesus Christ man, you tape a goddam "Punch Me" sign to your neck and expect people not to take a crack at you? Jesus Christ.
No you're just too dumb to understand what you read...
Same as Obama, but you believed him;). I know you're not too bright, but are you just plain stupid? They wouldn't issue the same thing to Obama...who still has the documents...and you fluffed right over that. Liberals are lying cherry pickers, which is why this thread just goes back and forth. Not a shred of honesty in any of you.
Some of you same 6-8 folks really need therapy. No one can be this volatile about something they have zero control over..do not come close to knowing all the facts, and are so set in their positions there is NO allowing for normal discussion.
God Bless America!!
Kinda but not really.
This thread is a like a Mosh Pit - you expect obnoxious and aggressive behavior but there's always that one guy(Adult) with a mullet still wearing acid washed jeans, high tops and a tank top with an iron on decal that wants to actually fight everyone.
Or to be fair,Flagpole and his abusive name calling.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
