no they aren't, you ignorant liar. Your understanding of good journalism is at the level of a junior high student who just read Atlas Shrugged.
So in your tiny little mind only the left has sources... lol...
John Solomon is a decorated journalist.
what is your damage, heather?
I'm not doubting Solomon here. Solomon just published a letter leaked to him by Team coup. The letter was basically a confession that Trump had Special Access Program (top secret) materials in his basement.
you don't seem to understand that the trump team leaked a letter to a right wing news source. that's how we know trump had Special Access Program info.
Oh well.
I didn't deny he did. I said you don't know which program. You don't.
I've heard that Trump was hoarding documents to show the FBI was corrupt AF to protect himself against the inevitable KGB style witch hunt that the Biden administration would pull on him.
Biden says he had nothing to do with the raid. We now have memos that prove that not only did Biden know, his administration was coordinating the whole thing.
This is not going to end the way you think it is.
He was breaking the law to prove that those who are supposed to enforce the law would enforce it?
BTW, did you explain why you resort to name calling on every single post?
7
0
Some people, like The Moron In the Room, should get a vasectomy
Biden says he had nothing to do with the raid. We now have memos that prove that not only did Biden know, his administration was coordinating the whole thing.
Dershowitz voted for Clinton and he voted for Biden.
The fact that he's honest about things you don't like to hear doesn't make him a republican. He knows the law and the law doesn't have a political party. Unless you're a corrupt democrat of course...
Just so you are on the record, you think Dershowitz is supporting Trump out of principle and respect of the law. You would say he is an “uncorrupted democrat”?
He isn't "supporting Trump" he's giving his opinion on what the law says.
I didn't deny he did. I said you don't know which program. You don't.
I've heard that Trump was hoarding documents to show the FBI was corrupt AF to protect himself against the inevitable KGB style witch hunt that the Biden administration would pull on him.
Biden says he had nothing to do with the raid. We now have memos that prove that not only did Biden know, his administration was coordinating the whole thing.
This is not going to end the way you think it is.
He was breaking the law to prove that those who are supposed to enforce the law would enforce it?
BTW, did you explain why you resort to name calling on every single post?
He wasn't breaking any laws until the Biden administration instructed the Archives to revoke his presidential privilege.
This is not going to end the way you think it is...
Trump crime stories are like crack for morons. You're all so consumed with the euphoria of finally getting back at the bad orange man for disagreeing with you that you can't comprehend anything but your little fantasy of him in a jumpsuit that matches his skin.
I call you names because you are completely abhorrent and not worthy of respect. I treat you the way you idiots treat anyone who disagrees with you. Because the complete lack of self-awareness is a prerequisite for being a liberal these days you're incapable of understanding this.
Just so you are on the record, you think Dershowitz is supporting Trump out of principle and respect of the law. You would say he is an “uncorrupted democrat”?
He isn't "supporting Trump" he's giving his opinion on what the law says.
Dershowitz made the suggestion in a 1997 op-ed in the Los Angeles Times, suggesting that 15 was a reasonable age of consent, no matter how old the other partner was.
So when he says this, he is just a simple country lawyer arguing for a lower age-of-consent? Or was it a self-serving article in the wake of his own Epstein revelations? Or was he a corrupted democrat there? Actually he reads a lot like a libratarian there.
Adult, there is nothing you can do to make these idiots actually realize their idiocracy, but simply play it for them. But, most will NEVER understand. Some have, but, most won't.
Biden says he had nothing to do with the raid. We now have memos that prove that not only did Biden know, his administration was coordinating the whole thing.
Source? An unbiased and reputable source, please.
You will dismiss any source as unreputable...
The National Archives letter to Trump discloses that Biden was heavily involved long before the raid.
See if you can find a copy of the letter on whatever leftist website you prefer.
Biden administration instructed the Archives to revoke his presidential privilege.
I call you names because you are completely abhorrent and not worthy of respect. I treat you the way you idiots treat anyone who disagrees with you. Because the complete lack of self-awareness is a prerequisite for being a liberal these days you're incapable of understanding this.
Wait, what privilege allows for former Presidents to keep top secret documents in a closet at home? And if Biden can revoke it, it would mean he can give it back. So Biden now can dictate who gets to take top secret documents home?
Firstly, I'm not a liberal. Did not vote for Hillary for reasons previously discussed. While I lean left, I absolutely don't vote democrat down the ballot. Secondly, you have to enter every conversation conceding that there is a chance that you may be wrong. I'm willing to listen to common sense and reason and I'd certainly love to see evidence that supports an argument. But, there isn't a single instance in any civilized discussion in which a valid argument is made prior to or after name-calling. You simply have zero credibility when name-calling is your tactic.
Hmmm, anybody know anyone else who resorts to name-calling?
So when he says this, he is just a simple country lawyer arguing for a lower age-of-consent? Or was it a self-serving article in the wake of his own Epstein revelations? Or was he a corrupted democrat there? Actually he reads a lot like a libratarian there.
He votes with you. You're not making the point you think you're making... lol.
1
6
Some people, like The Moron In the Room, should get a vasectomy
Biden administration instructed the Archives to revoke his presidential privilege.
I call you names because you are completely abhorrent and not worthy of respect. I treat you the way you idiots treat anyone who disagrees with you. Because the complete lack of self-awareness is a prerequisite for being a liberal these days you're incapable of understanding this.
Wait, what privilege allows for former Presidents to keep top secret documents in a closet at home? And if Biden can revoke it, it would mean he can give it back. So Biden now can dictate who gets to take top secret documents home?
Firstly, I'm not a liberal. Did not vote for Hillary for reasons previously discussed. While I lean left, I absolutely don't vote democrat down the ballot. Secondly, you have to enter every conversation conceding that there is a chance that you may be wrong. I'm willing to listen to common sense and reason and I'd certainly love to see evidence that supports an argument. But, there isn't a single instance in any civilized discussion in which a valid argument is made prior to or after name-calling. You simply have zero credibility when name-calling is your tactic.
Hmmm, anybody know anyone else who resorts to name-calling?
^^ This is the problem with people who are too lazy to do any research on their own.
Pro-tip: Don't rely on people on a f*cking running forum to educate you on anything that isn't running related.
If you think the TDS crowd here is entering into anything conceding there's a chance they may be wrong you haven't been paying attention.
I'm not here to win you over I'm here for catharsis.
Executive privilege is a thing. It is unprecedented for a sitting president to revoke the executive privilege of his predecessor and raid his home. Particularly when that sitting president's political party has been using the full force of the government to attack that political opponent for YEARS. Biden is corrupt AF and this is just more evidence of it.
So when he says this, he is just a simple country lawyer arguing for a lower age-of-consent? Or was it a self-serving article in the wake of his own Epstein revelations? Or was he a corrupted democrat there? Actually he reads a lot like a libratarian there.
He votes with you. You're not making the point you think you're making... lol.
I didn’t vote for either Trump or Biden. You are the one propping up Derschowitz as a man of principle when he seems like one of the more repulsive people involved in this whole debacle, along with Clinton, along with Trump.
Just the News has obtained the full text of the letter that the National Archives sent to former President Donald Trump requesting classified documents
He votes with you. You're not making the point you think you're making... lol.
I didn’t vote for either Trump or Biden. You are the one propping up Derschowitz as a man of principle when he seems like one of the more repulsive people involved in this whole debacle, along with Clinton, along with Trump.
He's a respected legal scholar and a lifelong Democrat. My apologies, but it is basically impossible to find a Democrat that isn't a POS in one way or another.
The point wasn't that he's a great guy the point was that he's on the left and has always been on the left and even he admits the law doesn't side with the TDS crowd on this.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
