oopsie wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projectionRachel1 wrote:
Oopsie is another ince,l cuckold loving soy boy.
Exactly, yet your side are the ones yelling soy boy and cvck all the time, while in reality your hero is putting ads out for studs to bang his wife.
The penny has dropped for you.
jesseriley wrote:
“But the deep state!...the judge!... the jurors!...the prosecutors!...”
Alert: damsel in distress!
"Russia!!!... we have it all!!!... Russia!!!"
Alert: demsel in distress!
Undecided Pennsylvania Voter wrote:
Rachel1 wrote:
It’s easy to spot the incel fanboys of cuckold roger.
Where have all the real men gone?
It's easy to spot beta male liberals posting under female names. Self-own.
It’s even easier to spot an actual real life cvck, they advertise for studs to bang their wife.
That’s your hero, your roll model, that is who you are vigorously defending.
smellin like roses wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
“But the deep state!...the judge!... the jurors!...the prosecutors!...”
Alert: damsel in distress!
"Russia!!!... we have it all!!!... Russia!!!"
Alert: demsel in distress!
Ask yourself this:
Why is Trump quite so hysterical about the possible length of the sentence?
It's not about fairness or doing away with corruption, it's not even because he wants to do a solid for a friend (he doesn't have any of those).
It's because he's terrified that Stone is going to start telling secrets. If there wasn't a risk for Trump himself, he'd happily let Stone (or anyone) rot in prison forever. He would have told the world how bad a man he was by now.
1. If this person is such a big problem, why didn't Stone's attorney raise objection during the jury selection? 2. Assuming she is biased, how did she convince the other 11 jurors that Stone was guilty on all counts? 3. As others point out, what do juror's potential bias have anything to do with the sentencing, which is determined by the judge?
oopsie wrote:
This show trial just got exposed for the partisan farce that it was ...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7998815/Tomeka-Hart-Roger-Stone-jury-foreperson-revealed-anti-Trump-activist.html
This thread is full of unintelligent d!ck measuring. Stone would be proud of you for cause of dumbing down the populace.
trollism wrote:
smellin like roses wrote:
"Russia!!!... we have it all!!!... Russia!!!"
Alert: demsel in distress!
Ask yourself this:
Why is Trump quite so hysterical about the possible length of the sentence?
It's not about fairness or doing away with corruption, it's not even because he wants to do a solid for a friend (he doesn't have any of those).
It's because he's terrified that Stone is going to start telling secrets. If there wasn't a risk for Trump himself, he'd happily let Stone (or anyone) rot in prison forever. He would have told the world how bad a man he was by now.
It's exactly this. You're just making sh-t up.
No, it's the same reason virtually all taking heads, politicians, lawyers, etc are saying the same thing... nine years for a process crime of telling the feds that you didn't talk to to somebody? Nine years? Swat raids... 25 agents... guns drawn... for saying that you didn't talk to somebody. Rapists do less than four...
Every single person with any interest in 'justice' should be concerned. I remember when liberals were skeptical of the judiciary, but not anymore.
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
1. If this person is such a big problem, why didn't Stone's attorney raise objection during the jury selection?
2. Assuming she is biased, how did she convince the other 11 jurors that Stone was guilty on all counts?
3. As others point out, what do juror's potential bias have anything to do with the sentencing, which is determined by the judge?
oopsie wrote:
This show trial just got exposed for the partisan farce that it was ...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7998815/Tomeka-Hart-Roger-Stone-jury-foreperson-revealed-anti-Trump-activist.html
His attorneys did... the judge denied.
Keep playing dumb, if you're even that smart.
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
1. If this person is such a big problem, why didn't Stone's attorney raise objection during the jury selection?
2. Assuming she is biased, how did she convince the other 11 jurors that Stone was guilty on all counts?
3. As others point out, what do juror's potential bias have anything to do with the sentencing, which is determined by the judge?
oopsie wrote:
This show trial just got exposed for the partisan farce that it was ...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7998815/Tomeka-Hart-Roger-Stone-jury-foreperson-revealed-anti-Trump-activist.html
Add to it, she lied about her knowledge of Stone. Social Media struck again.
How are you people so clueless?
smellin like roses wrote:
trollism wrote:
Ask yourself this:
Why is Trump quite so hysterical about the possible length of the sentence?
It's not about fairness or doing away with corruption, it's not even because he wants to do a solid for a friend (he doesn't have any of those).
It's because he's terrified that Stone is going to start telling secrets. If there wasn't a risk for Trump himself, he'd happily let Stone (or anyone) rot in prison forever. He would have told the world how bad a man he was by now.
It's exactly this. You're just making sh-t up.
No, it's the same reason virtually all taking heads, politicians, lawyers, etc are saying the same thing... nine years for a process crime of telling the feds that you didn't talk to to somebody? Nine years? Swat raids... 25 agents... guns drawn... for saying that you didn't talk to somebody. Rapists do less than four...
Every single person with any interest in 'justice' should be concerned. I remember when liberals were skeptical of the judiciary, but not anymore.
Trump has no interest in justice. Only self-preservation.
He (and you) know that Stone can implicate him and that's why he (and you) are so hysterical about it.
You know he was convicted of witness tampering too? That was pretty clear cut, surely even for a cultist like yourself.
Why not use your registered handle? Are you ashamed of your opinions or something. I know you must be one of the resident low IQ 'right wing heroes'.
trollism wrote:
smellin like roses wrote:
It's exactly this. You're just making sh-t up.
No, it's the same reason virtually all taking heads, politicians, lawyers, etc are saying the same thing... nine years for a process crime of telling the feds that you didn't talk to to somebody? Nine years? Swat raids... 25 agents... guns drawn... for saying that you didn't talk to somebody. Rapists do less than four...
Every single person with any interest in 'justice' should be concerned. I remember when liberals were skeptical of the judiciary, but not anymore.
Trump has no interest in justice. Only self-preservation.
He (and you) know that Stone can implicate him and that's why he (and you) are so hysterical about it.
You know he was convicted of witness tampering too? That was pretty clear cut, surely even for a cultist like yourself.
Why not use your registered handle? Are you ashamed of your opinions or something. I know you must be one of the resident low IQ 'right wing heroes'.
Self-preservation, huh? I'm pretty sure your propaganda networks are securing his preservation. Years of BS "Russia", Stormy, emoluments clause, obstruction of Congress for investigating real crimes, etc are treating DJT just fine.
smellin like roses wrote:
Self-preservation, huh? I'm pretty sure your propaganda networks are securing his preservation. Years of BS "Russia", Stormy, emoluments clause, obstruction of Congress for investigating real crimes, etc are treating DJT just fine.
You seem very upset by it all sweetie.
Is your relentless defence of these people getting tiring?
Why the unregistered name? Which one are you? Why so scared?
Speaking of hysterical, did you catch the video of the Arizona State student psychotically reacting to a table of student republicans in a common area of campus? Police are investigating the hysteria. Did you catch the news of the kid who ran their van through the table and tent set-up of republicans in Florida? He's in custody now. This was also last week. Scream at the sky, libs. It's the safest thing you do.
trollism wrote:
smellin like roses wrote:
Self-preservation, huh? I'm pretty sure your propaganda networks are securing his preservation. Years of BS "Russia", Stormy, emoluments clause, obstruction of Congress for investigating real crimes, etc are treating DJT just fine.
You seem very upset by it all sweetie.
Is your relentless defence of these people getting tiring?
Why the unregistered name? Which one are you? Why so scared?
Because I can.
Why you so mad? Scream at the sky.
smellin like roses wrote:
trollism wrote:
You seem very upset by it all sweetie.
Is your relentless defence of these people getting tiring?
Why the unregistered name? Which one are you? Why so scared?
Because I can.
Why you so mad? Scream at the sky.
I'm not mad, I'm just messing with you champ.
Are you ashamed of your opinions that much that you won't even attach them to your usual (anonymous) registered handle?
That's a whole level of insecurity right there. You should have more confidence in yourself.
Presenting that you and others have been duped for years about Stormy, and Russia, and all sorts of other BS presents plenty of self confidence, champ.
Oh, and again, because I can.
smellin like roses wrote:
trollism wrote:
You seem very upset by it all sweetie.
Is your relentless defence of these people getting tiring?
Why the unregistered name? Which one are you? Why so scared?
Because I can.
Why you so mad? Scream at the sky.
Rigged most vehemently partisan of the rwnj cabal here.
Rachel1 wrote:
ReallybroReally wrote:
The question at hand is not guilt. The question is on the length of the sentence. But for all of the commotion about what is going on, Trump could just (very legally) pardon him for heaven's sake.
It’s easy to spot the incel fanboys of cuckold roger.
Where have all the real men gone?
It is very easy to see those without a brain and just pure emotion. I merely stated facts. But I guess that is beyond you.
it’s rigged wrote:
smellin like roses wrote:
Because I can.
Why you so mad? Scream at the sky.
Rigged most vehemently partisan of the rwnj cabal here.
There you all go again... making sh-t up. Strong pattern among you. Literal delusion. Keep trying, it's entertaining.
smellin like roses wrote:
Presenting that you and others have been duped for years about Stormy, and Russia, and all sorts of other BS presents plenty of self confidence, champ.
Oh, and again, because I can.
It's fascinating really.
You clearly don't believe a word of what you're saying, but you feel you have to keep the defense up.
No wonder you're always all so angry.