Bur OJ was 77 years old.
How definitive is it that OJ killed his wife?
Non-Running
Pop Culture
-
00
-
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Wrong again. The judge in the defamation case said the sexual assault finding against Trump amounted to "rape" as it is generally understood. But that leaves you out. Understanding isn't one of your strong points.
None of the recently released facts about Oswald changed the official finding he alone murdered JFK. But I'm sure you will find reason to believe a burrito was involved.
Maybe in other jurisdictions, but in New York, the New York court is bound by local New York definitions, and when directly asked to decide the question of rape, the jurors said no.
Regarding Oswald, the official findings weren't released with all the facts. Once I've had the opportunity to review all the facts, I'll let you know my opinion about any remaining doubts about a second shooter, a magic bullet, a larger conspiracy, etc.
There were two trials. In the second trial the judge instructed the jury that the earlier sexual assault finding should be understood as Trump raped E Jean Carroll, in the common understanding of what that word means.
As far as Oswald is concerned, I can't wait for you to review all the facts that have been released in the last 62 years. At last we shall know the truth.
As per below:
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/
This post was edited 10 minutes after it was posted.10 -
.......which is why he was able to beat the charges. O.J. Simpson was found liable for the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman in a civil court.
10 -
OJ trial shpuld have been held like Sacramento. Marcia Clark did a horrible job. The jury was 98% black supposedly with 1 latina woman? The shoe prints were a rare Bruno Magli shoe of a certain size. OJ said he would never buy that shoe because they were ugly. After the verdict, National Inquirer found photos of OJ wearing the exact Bruno Magli shoes at a public football game. Remember- no cell phone cameras back then. Busted. Totally botched trial with low IQ, racist bla k jury mad at that racist white cop. The prosecutor's expert witness on DNA also was terrible.
23 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
But we aren't talking about my words or your words. You said a civil court said he committed crimes. What did the courts really say?
Regarding Oswald, once again, I would need to see all the facts, rather than take your word.
They said he killed his ex and her lover. That is how he was found liable for their deaths. To the uninitiated such as yourself intentionally killing someone is murder. It wasn't a criminal trial but for a court to say he committed a wrongful killing is to say he committed murder, just like a civil court said Trump committed a rape.
The facts about Oswald have been out for more than 60 years. You don't have to take my word. You never stop showing how unbelievably ignorant you are.
21 -
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
They said he killed his ex and her lover. That is how he was found liable for their deaths. To the uninitiated such as yourself intentionally killing someone is murder. It wasn't a criminal trial but for a court to say he committed a wrongful killing is to say he committed murder, just like a civil court said Trump committed a rape.
The facts about Oswald have been out for more than 60 years. You don't have to take my word. You never stop showing how unbelievably ignorant you are.
It did come from behind. Forensic ballistics experts explained that decades ago. You never caught up. Now tell me how 9/11 wasn't two jetliners but was an inside job and the moon landings were staged in a warehouse in Arizona.
This post was edited 36 seconds after it was posted.12 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
It did come from behind. Forensic ballistics experts explained that decades ago. You never caught up. Now tell me how 9/11 wasn't two jetliners but was an inside job and the moon landings were staged in a warehouse in Arizona.
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears..." and accepting that this shot came from behind, bounced around inside his skull and blew out backwards in the same direction it came from is to accept that 2 + 2 = 5. Congratulations. JFK fired three CIA directors in three years, he said he would cut the agency into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.
The Warren Commission was an obvious sham, and was based on manipulated video evidence where they inverted the several frames depicting the headshot impact to make it seem like his head moved forward.
The planes absolutely did hit the towers. If you can't understand that that event was allowed to happen by our government and others to manufacture consent for wars and mass surveillance, then I don't really care to listen to your insults. I believe the moon landing happened but it is strange that we were able to do that with computers that counted working memory in BYTES, and we now have tiny phones with GB of RAM but still haven't been back to the surface with humans in over 50 years, which has always had some level of forward-looking strategic importance.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/503645?seq=1
https://ia904606.us.archive.org/8/items/911-dancing-israelis-information-pack/The%20Dancing%20Israelis%20-%20FBI%20Docs%20Shed%20Light%20on%20Apparent%20Mossad%20Foreknowledge%20of%20911%20Attacks%20--%20Whitney%20Webb_text.pdf00 -
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
It did come from behind. Forensic ballistics experts explained that decades ago. You never caught up. Now tell me how 9/11 wasn't two jetliners but was an inside job and the moon landings were staged in a warehouse in Arizona.
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears..." and accepting that this shot came from behind, bounced around inside his skull and blew out backwards in the same direction it came from is to accept that 2 + 2 = 5. Congratulations. JFK fired three CIA directors in three years, he said he would cut the agency into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.The Warren Commission was an obvious sham, and was based on manipulated video evidence where they inverted the several frames depicting the headshot impact to make it seem like his head moved forward.
The planes absolutely did hit the towers. If you can't understand that that event was allowed to happen by our government and others to manufacture consent for wars and mass surveillance, then I don't really care to listen to your insults. I believe the moon landing happened but it is strange that we were able to do that with computers that counted working memory in BYTES, and we now have tiny phones with GB of RAM but still haven't been back to the surface with humans in over 50 years, which has always had some level of forward-looking strategic importance.
And it's strange that Oswald was publicly executed by a Zionist (who had changed his last name to Ruby from Rubenstein) before he could provide his own version of events. Very convenient. I sense that people like you, who are intelligent, are afraid of the truth and it's more comfortable to label people who speak up as loony.
11 -
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
It did come from behind. Forensic ballistics experts explained that decades ago. You never caught up. Now tell me how 9/11 wasn't two jetliners but was an inside job and the moon landings were staged in a warehouse in Arizona.
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears..." and accepting that this shot came from behind, bounced around inside his skull and blew out backwards in the same direction it came from is to accept that 2 + 2 = 5. Congratulations. JFK fired three CIA directors in three years, he said he would cut the agency into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.The Warren Commission was an obvious sham, and was based on manipulated video evidence where they inverted the several frames depicting the headshot impact to make it seem like his head moved forward.
The planes absolutely did hit the towers. If you can't understand that that event was allowed to happen by our government and others to manufacture consent for wars and mass surveillance, then I don't really care to listen to your insults. I believe the moon landing happened but it is strange that we were able to do that with computers that counted working memory in BYTES, and we now have tiny phones with GB of RAM but still haven't been back to the surface with humans in over 50 years, which has always had some level of forward-looking strategic importance.
Still conspiracy theories.
02 -
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears..." and accepting that this shot came from behind, bounced around inside his skull and blew out backwards in the same direction it came from is to accept that 2 + 2 = 5. Congratulations. JFK fired three CIA directors in three years, he said he would cut the agency into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.The Warren Commission was an obvious sham, and was based on manipulated video evidence where they inverted the several frames depicting the headshot impact to make it seem like his head moved forward.
The planes absolutely did hit the towers. If you can't understand that that event was allowed to happen by our government and others to manufacture consent for wars and mass surveillance, then I don't really care to listen to your insults. I believe the moon landing happened but it is strange that we were able to do that with computers that counted working memory in BYTES, and we now have tiny phones with GB of RAM but still haven't been back to the surface with humans in over 50 years, which has always had some level of forward-looking strategic importance.
And it's strange that Oswald was publicly executed by a Zionist (who had changed his last name to Ruby from Rubenstein) before he could provide his own version of events. Very convenient. I sense that people like you, who are intelligent, are afraid of the truth and it's more comfortable to label people who speak up as loony.
More conspiracy theories.
02 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
And it's strange that Oswald was publicly executed by a Zionist (who had changed his last name to Ruby from Rubenstein) before he could provide his own version of events. Very convenient. I sense that people like you, who are intelligent, are afraid of the truth and it's more comfortable to label people who speak up as loony.
More conspiracy theories.
I can appreciate that you would rather feel safe than question things
02 -
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
More conspiracy theories.
I can appreciate that you would rather feel safe than question things
Conspiracy theories aren't "questioning things"; it is mere fantasizing.
11 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
I can appreciate that you would rather feel safe than question things
Conspiracy theories aren't "questioning things"; it is mere fantasizing.
you make giggle, thanks for the laugh, stay safe
22 -
clearly, this headshot did not come from behind wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Conspiracy theories aren't "questioning things"; it is mere fantasizing.
you make giggle, thanks for the laugh, stay safe
I feel safe enough. I don't live in Gaza, Ukraine or the US - violence capitals of the world.
This post was edited 36 seconds after it was posted.02 -
yes, the Bruno Magli shoe prints was evidence introduced at the civil trial that was not presented at the criminal trial.
10
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.