You don't have any idea how I vote, or if I vote at all. I'm trying to help you argue more logically rather than relying on assumptions, and to stay consistent with what you say you support rather than changing it based on the needs of the latest counterargument. As previously stated, being consistent would make you more of a sophisticated thinker than most politically-active people.
You wouldn't see the main platform of another sport cranking out this kind of top tier, apropos of nothing content
Fair enough. But this is a messageboard with a filter and I specifically posted this under non-running content. I could have posted it under a fake name, maybe that would have been better? But critics constantly complain about anonymity.
The messageboard has always been where people can discuss whatever they want. I say it's what the you'd talk about on a long run with your friends.
It doesn't matter that you posted it under non-running content Rojo. That post was totally disgusting no matter what category it is assigned to.
You don't have any idea how I vote, or if I vote at all. I'm trying to help you argue more logically rather than relying on assumptions, and to stay consistent with what you say you support rather than changing it based on the needs of the latest counterargument. As previously stated, being consistent would make you more of a sophisticated thinker than most politically-active people.
If you don't vote your opinion is irrelevant.
Logic doesn't work on people who make all of their decisions emotionally.
I'm not here to win the hearts and minds of anyone.
If your political opinions are shaped by a running forum you really shouldn't be voting.
Fair enough. But this is a messageboard with a filter and I specifically posted this under non-running content. I could have posted it under a fake name, maybe that would have been better? But critics constantly complain about anonymity.
The messageboard has always been where people can discuss whatever they want. I say it's what the you'd talk about on a long run with your friends.
It doesn't matter that you posted it under non-running content Rojo. That post was totally disgusting no matter what category it is assigned to.
If it was "popular" McCarthy wouldn't have been censured. He was.
Republicans go too far on abortion. Democrats go too far on everything including abortion.
A few hours ago you said most people were anti-communist. So it was popular. Then it wasn't because he was belatedly reined in, I guess? I'm coming to the conclusion you're a troll, even a nitwit wouldn't be this good at arguing inconsistently. Or rather, a nitwit wouldn't be this good at switching what he was arguing whenever it was advantageous.
He’s dumb and dishonest. And not faking anything. Duh.
Democrats are a cult. Zero independent thought. It's a hive mind of stupidity. You're told what to think and you think it without question.
Do you understand how stupid it sounds when you say other people lack independent thought, and your proof is some rando just repeating the world's most popular Podcaster as your proof?
Vaccines are popular. Antivaxxers are still a weird little cult.
The only people who think democrats are authoritarians are very online right wingers.
Supporting Ukraine's ability to defend themselves from Russia's invasion doesn't make someone pro war.
I don't even know what the supposed generic claim of censorship refers to. Is that Florida and other red states banning books and history classes from schools? Banning gay and trans events from the public sphere?
I’m not reading the prior dozen pages, so forgive me if this has been answered already, but…..
Didn’t Trump already win his case against Stormy Daniels? (Yes)
And isn’t her lawyer (former MSM presidential “contender” Michael Avenatti) literally in jail for stealing from her AND trying to extort the Nike corporation? (Yes)
So he won the legal battles, and it’s now outside the statute of limitations. WTF is going on here? How stupid is our government/society that these blatant political witch hunts are allowed to carry on? Move on already.
Wouldn’t the most prudent path forward be to prove how much better the establishment can be than Trump?
Oh, that’s right. They can’t.
Instead we get 7 years of “investigations” (the “walls [have been] closing in” since 2017)....zero indictments against Trump himself…..an odd re-hash of Stormy Daniels for some reason…..a silly raccoon dog story…..and a bill for $100B to Ukraine. Thanks DC/NY!
The weaponization of government institutions (Justice Department, FBI, IRS, Courts) used for political purposes against individuals and opposition groups is exponentially a more serious threat to American freedoms than any minor crimes by Trump.
The democrats have corrupted the tools of government in much the same way as communists and authoritarians wield their subversive ways of oppression to retain power.
We need term limits on all persons serving in elected, judicial, and deep state official government positions.
Yes. And if there was evidence of anything illegal about that, Bill would have been indicted. But there was not. John Edwards did get indicted and tried -- not convicted. Now Donald is about to get indicted for something similar but not identical. Devil is in the details. Will he get convicted on this? It looks like a much stronger case than the case against Edwards.
NO KINGS. Prosecute these elites when warranted. Donald has played the system to delay, but this is just the 1st of several likely indictments, and perhaps the LEAST significant.
I’m curious, what is it that he said here that Democrats disagree with? This clip is short…
Okay I watched most of the clip. He does the Monty Burns 'those FAT CATS in Washington' speech. Yes we all want to replace corrupt politicians, with honest politicians who act for their constituents and not rich donors. But is Monty Burns honest or corrupt? Is Donald Trump honest or corrupt? Let's not be foolish.
I’m not reading the prior dozen pages, so forgive me if this has been answered already, but…..
Didn’t Trump already win his case against Stormy Daniels? (Yes)
And isn’t her lawyer (former MSM presidential “contender” Michael Avenatti) literally in jail for stealing from her AND trying to extort the Nike corporation? (Yes)
So he won the legal battles, and it’s now outside the statute of limitations. WTF is going on here? How stupid is our government/society that these blatant political witch hunts are allowed to carry on? Move on already.
Wouldn’t the most prudent path forward be to prove how much better the establishment can be than Trump?
Oh, that’s right. They can’t.
Instead we get 7 years of “investigations” (the “walls [have been] closing in” since 2017)....zero indictments against Trump himself…..an odd re-hash of Stormy Daniels for some reason…..a silly raccoon dog story…..and a bill for $100B to Ukraine. Thanks DC/NY!
We will be looking to people like you next week to bring it, let the liberal elites know they can't get away with power grabs forever. They will be several disabused of that notion!
Honestly, I think Joe Biden is more guilty than Trump is in the Stormy Daniels incident. So many politicians like John Edwards and Bill Clinton have already skated by on similar incidents. There are other things that Trump is more culpable for. This is the wrong one for the Dems to go for first.
Honestly, I think Joe Biden is more guilty than Trump is in the Stormy Daniels incident. So many politicians like John Edwards and Bill Clinton have already skated by on similar incidents. There are other things that Trump is more culpable for. This is the wrong one for the Dems to go for first.
That's what I heard too. I heard the federal agents don't even have standing to indict Trump, who was not even aware of the alleged incidents with Stormi Daniel in the legal sense of the word.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
