Here's the thing I always wondered with this guy - wouldn't you even be slightly curious to know what OJ Simpson was (obviously) trying to covertly throw away at LAX at like 10pm at night? Not curious enough to go take a look? Maybe, maybe not - either way if he had it's kind of crazy to think that none of the resulting moments - some of the most infamous in the history of American popular culture, probably happen. OJ get's arrested on arrival in Chicago. No car chase, no trial, no "if it doesn't fit you must acquit". Skip Junis could have changed the course of history but didn't...
Here's the thing I always wondered with this guy - wouldn't you even be slightly curious to know what OJ Simpson was (obviously) trying to covertly throw away at LAX at like 10pm at night? Not curious enough to go take a look? Maybe, maybe not - either way if he had it's kind of crazy to think that none of the resulting moments - some of the most infamous in the history of American popular culture, probably happen. OJ get's arrested on arrival in Chicago. No car chase, no trial, no "if it doesn't fit you must acquit". Skip Junis could have changed the course of history but didn't...
At the time Junis saw O.J. at the airport, he was unaware that the murders had occurred.
I do think it is a reasonable question to ask whether he acted alone. I think he had help in the cover up (disposing of evidence), but I mean in the actual murders.
I do think it is a reasonable question to ask whether he acted alone. I think he had help in the cover up (disposing of evidence), but I mean in the actual murders.
It seems unlikely. He wasn’t going to call somebody before the murders took place and ask him to be an accessory to murder. If he called someone after the murders, there would have been about a 99% they would have notified the police. Was he going to call one of his golfing buddies?
I do think it is a reasonable question to ask whether he acted alone. I think he had help in the cover up (disposing of evidence), but I mean in the actual murders.
It seems unlikely. He wasn’t going to call somebody before the murders took place and ask him to be an accessory to murder. If he called someone after the murders, there would have been about a 99% they would have notified the police. Was he going to call one of his golfing buddies?
One of his scumbag lawyers disposed of the knife for him.
It seems unlikely. He wasn’t going to call somebody before the murders took place and ask him to be an accessory to murder. If he called someone after the murders, there would have been about a 99% they would have notified the police. Was he going to call one of his golfing buddies?
One of his scumbag lawyers disposed of the knife for him.
Robert Kardashian. So they put him on the defense team so he could have attorney-client privilege, even though he never contributed to the defense in a visible, meaningful way.
The Louis Vuitton Garment Bag
Kardashian's Actions: After the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, Robert Kardashian Sr. took the Louis Vuitton garment bag from O.J. Simpson's house.
Contents: Kardashian stated that when police later searched his home, they found the bag in his bedroom, open and containing ordinary items like toiletries, clothes, and golf clothes.
Kardashian's Claim: Kardashian told ABC News that he had been trying to give the bag to the police at Rockingham, but they refused to take it.
Later Speculation: While there was speculation that the bag might have contained the murder weapon or bloody clothes, Kim Kardashian confirmed its contents were just normal items, according to her interview with GQ.
Legal Consequences Attorney-Client Privilege: As O.J. Simpson's lawyer, Robert Kardashian was able to avoid testifying about the bag by invoking attorney-client privilege, according to Syracuse.com.
Oh he did it alright. Did the deed. Drove home. His ride to the airport was there, he parked the car outside the gate. First time he ever did that. Jumped the fence, dropped the bloody glove and startled kato. Freaked out in the back of the bronco, was going to end it. Got some lawyers, got a favorable jury. Losers on that jury. Got off. In the clear. Looked for murderer on the golf course, had to move to Florida because he was unwelcome at his club in california, in the neighborhood. Everyone knew he did it. Then he went to Vegas and caused some trouble, the courts there made him pay for that as well as his likely role in the killings. The whole thing was Shame.
I do think it is a reasonable question to ask whether he acted alone. I think he had help in the cover up (disposing of evidence), but I mean in the actual murders.
It seems unlikely. He wasn’t going to call somebody before the murders took place and ask him to be an accessory to murder. If he called someone after the murders, there would have been about a 99% they would have notified the police. Was he going to call one of his golfing buddies?
The theory is not that he asked anyone to help with a murder. It is that Nicole Brown owed a lot of money for drugs and the drug dealers were leaning on OJ for help, so a dealer and OJ went to her condo with that agenda, then things went very wrong. The theory started from OJ's own book:
In a controversial 2006 book and television interview, titled If I Did It, O.J. Simpson himself described a "hypothetical" scenario in which he committed the murders with an unnamed accomplice he referred to as "Charlie".
This narrative generated further speculation: Some theories have linked this hypothetical "Charlie" to a real-life acquaintance of Simpson named Charles "Charlie" Ehrlich, a former drug trafficker who was later involved with Simpson in the 2007 Las Vegas armed robbery for which Simpson was convicted. Ehrlich was charged as an accomplice in the Las Vegas incident but did not serve jail time after accepting a plea deal to testify against Simpson. Ehrlich consistently denied any involvement in the 1994 murders, of course.
It seems unlikely. He wasn’t going to call somebody before the murders took place and ask him to be an accessory to murder. If he called someone after the murders, there would have been about a 99% they would have notified the police. Was he going to call one of his golfing buddies?
The theory is not that he asked anyone to help with a murder. It is that Nicole Brown owed a lot of money for drugs and the drug dealers were leaning on OJ for help, so a dealer and OJ went to her condo with that agenda, then things went very wrong. The theory started from OJ's own book:
In a controversial 2006 book and television interview, titled If I Did It, O.J. Simpson himself described a "hypothetical" scenario in which he committed the murders with an unnamed accomplice he referred to as "Charlie".
This narrative generated further speculation: Some theories have linked this hypothetical "Charlie" to a real-life acquaintance of Simpson named Charles "Charlie" Ehrlich, a former drug trafficker who was later involved with Simpson in the 2007 Las Vegas armed robbery for which Simpson was convicted. Ehrlich was charged as an accomplice in the Las Vegas incident but did not serve jail time after accepting a plea deal to testify against Simpson. Ehrlich consistently denied any involvement in the 1994 murders, of course.
There was no evidence that Nicole used cocaine, there was none found in her system when she died and none in her condo.
If she did use cocaine, it would have been as a user and not a dealer. It would have been a few thousand and pocket change to O.J. There’s no way Simpson would have horsed around with a dealer to collect the money.
It seems unlikely. He wasn’t going to call somebody before the murders took place and ask him to be an accessory to murder. If he called someone after the murders, there would have been about a 99% they would have notified the police. Was he going to call one of his golfing buddies?
The theory is not that he asked anyone to help with a murder. It is that Nicole Brown owed a lot of money for drugs and the drug dealers were leaning on OJ for help, so a dealer and OJ went to her condo with that agenda, then things went very wrong. The theory started from OJ's own book:
In a controversial 2006 book and television interview, titled If I Did It, O.J. Simpson himself described a "hypothetical" scenario in which he committed the murders with an unnamed accomplice he referred to as "Charlie".
This narrative generated further speculation: Some theories have linked this hypothetical "Charlie" to a real-life acquaintance of Simpson named Charles "Charlie" Ehrlich, a former drug trafficker who was later involved with Simpson in the 2007 Las Vegas armed robbery for which Simpson was convicted. Ehrlich was charged as an accomplice in the Las Vegas incident but did not serve jail time after accepting a plea deal to testify against Simpson. Ehrlich consistently denied any involvement in the 1994 murders, of course.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.