douglas burke wrote:
http://www.marathonguide.com/news/newsviewer.cfm?src=http%3A%2F%2Fbleacherreport%2Ecom%2Farticles%2F1141626-bosto
Talk about irresponsible journalism. The headline is pure sensationalism.
douglas burke wrote:
http://www.marathonguide.com/news/newsviewer.cfm?src=http%3A%2F%2Fbleacherreport%2Ecom%2Farticles%2F1141626-bosto
Talk about irresponsible journalism. The headline is pure sensationalism.
Anothervoteforpulp wrote:
They were three minutes away because they didn't give it a go until late in the race. They were scared to go out in 58 to 59 minutes.
What do you think a Half Marathon could be run in on the first half of the course of Boston on a day like last year? 56min...? Probably, right?
Are you a f*cking idiot? 56 minutes? Even if we take that you mean 56:59 that is 27:00 10k pace. You think that is even remotely possible even with a tail wind?
I swear there are people on here who I question if they actually know anything at all about elite running.