LoL! You really are an endless source of entertainment, aren't you Skuj? Conversing with you is much like dealing with a 4-year-old.
That being said, you essentially answered by question by NOT acknowledging what you did. Of course, I'm curious if you are going to go old school Skuj on us and go back to creating all-caps topic subjects that are as long as humanly possible, simply to draw more attention to your "words of wisdom."
Again? wrote:
LoL! You really are an endless source of entertainment, aren't you Skuj? Conversing with you is much like dealing with a 4-year-old.
That being said, you essentially answered by question by NOT acknowledging what you did. Of course, I'm curious if you are going to go old school Skuj on us and go back to creating all-caps topic subjects that are as long as humanly possible, simply to draw more attention to your "words of wisdom."
Um.....what? :) Liar.
LoL! Once again, even after all this time it doesn't occur to you to apologize for that infamously blatant trolling?
No worries, Skuj. You certainly don't HAVE to do that, but then again, that means I don't have to stop following you around reminding you, either. Have a nice day! :-)
Googler wrote:
http://www.google.com
Skuj wrote:
Yes, I've heard of google. So, what do I put in to find Ovett's season?
Um, 1985? Duh!
Again? wrote:
LoL! Once again, even after all this time it doesn't occur to you to apologize for that infamously blatant trolling?
No worries, Skuj. You certainly don't HAVE to do that, but then again, that means I don't have to stop following you around reminding you, either. Have a nice day! :-)
WTF are yopu blathering on about? What trolling? What does any of this have to do with Ovett 85? Why is it that me saying 2 years ago that Wariner could run 42.98 is a constant source of so much stress and unhappiness for you?
Googler wrote:
Um, 1985? Duh!
Oh wow, why didn't I think of that? Thanks. End thread.
Again? wrote:
LoL! You really are an endless source of entertainment, aren't you Skuj? Conversing with you is much like dealing with a 4-year-old.
That being said, you essentially answered by question by NOT acknowledging what you did. Of course, I'm curious if you are going to go old school Skuj on us and go back to creating all-caps topic subjects that are as long as humanly possible, simply to draw more attention to your "words of wisdom."
Look, we all know the guy is an attention whore. Why else would he have created a thread like this when anyone with the slightest knowledge of the internet could have found the answer in less time than it took to start this thread? And if you think that's bad, go to his web site and check out his ridiculous posing and preening for the photos there. Remember, this is the same guy that kept going to the front of the line when a newspaper photographer was snapping pictures of the running group, just so that he would be the main focus of the photo.
http://cvrr.ca/cpage/Tuesday_TrackThe guy's got an ego the size of Canada when it deserves to be more like the size of his johnson, if that.
He thrives on these little disagreements with letsrun posters. The guy thinks he shits gold. His typical modus operandi is to refer to those who disagree with him as liars, or running dog, often while using an alias to attempt to distract. He even got into it with Coach K! He has singularly destroyed the DYRT thread and is now spreading his smelly tentacles across the rest of letsrun.
My advice to you is to do your best to ignore him. This is what running dog did on the DYRT thread with great success. Skuj virtually disappeard from that thread for months because he couldn't get a rise out of running dog. Unfortunately running dog's self-control has weakened and Skuj has returned there with a vengeance as he tries to discredit the one guy who deserves the most credit for the success of that thread, while he tries to take the credit for himself!
Skuj (or alias) will now come on here and call me a liar and/or running dog. Bet on it.
From
http://www.alltime-athletics.com
:
3:37.74 Steve Ovett GBR 09.10.55 2 Stockholm 02.07.1985
7:49.83 Steve Ovett GBR 09.10.55 1 Birmingham 07.07.1985
3:55.01 Steve Ovett GBR 09.10.55 1 Edinburgh 23.07.1985
3:37.91 Steve Ovett GBR 09.10.55 2 Lappeenranta 30.07.1985
Again? wrote:
LoL! Once again, even after all this time it doesn't occur to you to apologize for that infamously blatant trolling?
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=2113705Skuj wrote:
WTF are yopu blathering on about? What trolling?
Pick any page.
Again? wrote:
Beyond that, you were the consummate troll, and now because Alzheimer's disease has apparently affected your memory a person who DOES remember what you said is a liar? You're pathetic, Skuj. Even two years after the fact, your childish attempts at gaining attention still remain. Nothing remotely resembling an apology for your immature antics. Tell me, what do you want to be when you grow up some day?
I don't give a damn about either of you two ding dongs but if he said what he said how about LINKING us to it to prove your point?
sizer wrote:
I don't give a damn about either of you two ding dongs but if he said what he said how about LINKING us to it to prove your point?
Good try, Skuj.
Sorry, no, I'm just someone who understands that this forum does not allow you to edit posts. So if Ding Dong #2 lied about something, then Ding Dong #1 should either show us the thread or stop whining about it already.
This whole, "yes you did", "no i didn't" garbage gets old.
sizer wrote:
Sorry, no, I'm just someone who understands that this forum does not allow you to edit posts. So if Ding Dong #2 lied about something, then Ding Dong #1 should either show us the thread or stop whining about it already.
This whole, "yes you did", "no i didn't" garbage gets old.
You don't understand as much as you think. Or do you, Skuj? After all, you're the one who keeps claiming that runner dog's 800 workout post was "deleted" by the moderators whenever you're asked to prove your false claims about him. But when the jinx is on you, you suddenly claim there should be a link to your Wariner lies. You can't have it both ways, troll!
No. No. No. Please try to pay attention. I am the one claiming that both you (hereafter referred to as "Ding Dong #1" and "Skuj" (hereafter referred to as "Ding Dong #2") are children. Emotionally speaking that is.
I'll leave the troll judgement up to the rest of the peanut gallery but there seems to be little doubt on that score.
But in the interests of getting your story straight: You, Ding Dong #1 are now saying that the post where Ding Dong #2 lied was deleted? Or is Ding Dong #2 the one claiming that?
sizer wrote:
No. No. No. Please try to pay attention. I am the one claiming that both you (hereafter referred to as "Ding Dong #1" and "Skuj" (hereafter referred to as "Ding Dong #2") are children. Emotionally speaking that is.
I'll leave the troll judgement up to the rest of the peanut gallery but there seems to be little doubt on that score.
But in the interests of getting your story straight: You, Ding Dong #1 are now saying that the post where Ding Dong #2 lied was deleted? Or is Ding Dong #2 the one claiming that?
Dear Ding Dong #2,
Your efforts to distract attention from the fact that you lied are weak. The explanation that the post had been deleted was mentioned well before you started using the alias "sizer" (an obvious reference to the "johnson" dig earlier in the thread).
It is you who are the child. It is immature to distract attention away from yourself so that your own lies and misconducts are hopefully forgotten. We all read the first page of the thread, so your feigned ignorance regarding the deleted post does not carry any weight.
Please consider dyestat for your trolling efforts in the future.
Ding Dong #1
Dear Ding Dong #1
So sorry if I missed a post in which one of you ding dongs claimed another post had been deleted. My eyes began to glaze over after the second or third "yes you did", "no you didn't" exchange.
I understand that you are not a fan of Ding Dong #2. Your persistence in asserting that I am he, while inexplicable (as I am not into insulting myself), is at least admirable in its consistency.
Regardless, thanks for clearing up the nature of your petty squabble. Now children (and I do mean both of you), please go outside and play. Just be home in time for supper.
Sincerely,
Your parents.
sizer wrote:
Dear Ding Dong #1
So sorry if I missed a post in which one of you ding dongs claimed another post had been deleted. My eyes began to glaze over after the second or third "yes you did", "no you didn't" exchange.
It was on page 1! Again you are caught in a lie.
Holy f*** this thread is funny, hahahaha....I mean, wtf? I know my friend RD is here, plus a couple other fans, but I can't follow along anymore, hahaha....
But thanks to the person who provided the 1985 stats.
Cheers.
Ovett had a low key 1985, though he did seem to return to something like his old form at the end of the season. He beat Cram (in his best ever year) over a Mile on the road around September/October time.
Here's a link showing all the races he competed in:
http://www.thegreatdistancerunners.de/SteveOvett.html
Scroll down for '85.
I find in funny how bent out of shape people get towards one of the few posters that uses a consistent name. It makes them a bigger target, but at least they have the balls to do so and have a history on letsrun.