Lazy L wrote:
Think of it this way:
Would "That ain't right" even occur to anyone upon seeing any of the following combinations:
Male face in female crotch?
Female face in male crotch?
Female face in female crotch?
Obviously, the answer is no to any of those combinations.
Truly, "That ain't right" is a slur used almost exclusively by caveman types upon seeing two other men get a little too close for their liking.
Actually any of those combinations in a scene in which athletes are dunking over one another and inadvertently planting their crotches in each other's faces would be a "that ain't right" situation. Awkward sex-like encounters during athletics would still qualify for the "that ain't right" phrase assuming both parties wouldn't consent to having sex. It reminds me of the oft-told high school wrestling story when a male wrestler inadvertently got an erection while wrestling a female in competition. When it got retold, the phrase "that ain't right" inevitably was tacked on to the end. Were they all homophobes, Lazy L?
"That ain't right" applies to many fratboy-humor type situations. It's almost exclusively immature humor, but it's almost never homophobic (watch the HBO Bob Saget special called "That Ain't Right" for an example of what this stupid phrase really applies to: in his case it was bestiality, incest, pedophilia, etc.).
You and others like you decided that that specific phrase was actually homophobic. You're like the black administrator who recently decided that comparing a notoriously backlogged traffic court in which needed paperwork frequently disappeared to the galactic body which sucks up stars and even light itself was actually racist merely because the word had "black" in it. In short, you're an idiot.
We can only hope that an Obama presidency ends these kinds of identity politics that fester on white guilt or in this case "straight guilt."