Crash is crap. Why are all movies crap anyways? All that money for crap. How bout I take a shit your in dvd tray and press play. Would you give me the Academy award for that?
Crash is crap. Why are all movies crap anyways? All that money for crap. How bout I take a shit your in dvd tray and press play. Would you give me the Academy award for that?
rod man wrote:
How bout I take a shit your in dvd tray and press play. Would you give me the Academy award for that?
Yeah, I would.
radon wrote:
its somewhat simplistic in the way everything is assembled and the developments of the archetypal characters... it definately brings its message across well, but as a work of art it does not account ot much
I feel the same way. They went for the shock value but when the movie was all said and done, it didn't really piece together in a believable manner. That might have been their idea behind the movie but it doesn't show creativity to me.
From what people have been saying on the television, over 75% of the voters for the Oscars live in Los Angeles, the setting for Crash. In addition, they also said that there are actually movements by people to push the move for awards. I just cannot believe that there would be people out there doing that, but I guess I should have. In the end, I learned that award shows are stupid for the most part anyways. Everyone has different tastes.
A nice little movie, but not deserving of the academy award. Munich was by far and away the best movie of the year...but thank god the gay cowboy movie didn't get it.
There was no way that Munich was going to win.
Munich didn't paint the Palestinians as wonderful humanitarians...
i dont know about you guys, but i didnt trust the minority in this movie.
I thought this thread was about the other movie crash. The one where sex freaks make love and wreck cars. That movie should have won an oscar.
Did anyone else think that A History of Violence didn't receive the critical acclaim it deserved and Vigo should have been up for an Oscar? I think he's coming on leaps and bounds from LOTRs.
ChrisLeak wrote:
Eric Bana was really good in it.
So Bana was 'really good,' but Crash was 'great'? I disagree. Crash was pretty good, but Bana was great. Glad to see the Academy f up on both accounts. But, really, who cares?
Did anyone else noticed how the black characters in the movie made a change for the better compared to the white characters making a change for the worst? Was there some sort of agenda to this? it is just something I noticed ... am I looking too far into this?
By the way, Munich was a great movie (the last sex scene was a bit weird... could have done without that).
capote was the best movie of the year.
wow, i didnt realize we had so many Roger f***in Eberts
Munich was nowhere near the best movie of the year. Hell there was a Palestinian movie (Paradise Now) that was easily better.
"wow, i didnt realize we had so many Roger f***in Eberts"
hahaha, no shit man.
the pereneum falcon wrote:
ChrisLeak wrote:Eric Bana was really good in it.
So Bana was 'really good,' but Crash was 'great'? I disagree. Crash was pretty good, but Bana was great. Glad to see the Academy f up on both accounts. But, really, who cares?
Semantics.
Fine, Bana was great.
Marcel Marceau wrote:
Munich was nowhere near the best movie of the year. Hell there was a Palestinian movie (Paradise Now) that was easily better.
That's the one I really want to see... unfortunately I didn't get a chance when it was here in Columbia.
scotth wrote:
Fun movie, sorta disturbing but absorbing. Bought the soundtrack...haunting.
what is the name of the song they played from crash during the oscars?
didn\'t really check wrote:
Ludacris was a thinly veiled Robin Hood.
I liked the movie but felt like it was based on a cheap movie trick: make the audience think that a character is one way (either make them love or hate the character) and then have the character do something to change the audience\'s mind.
Almost every major character in the movie starts out a jerk and turns out to be good or vice versa. For a couple minutes after the movie I felt like I had been dragged on an emotional rollercoaster.
But yeah, I usually don\'t cry and that movie brought tears to my eyes (like the little girl getting shot sceen). And when I think about my critique it can be said that\'s the reason why the movie is good. Whatever though. Don Ceadle\'s looks like a gorilla with those eyes.
Get a life redneck.
................Cats, watch it
If you think Matt Dillon and Sandra Bullock's characters made a change for the worse, then you must have been watching a different movie.