Ivanka's leadership wrote:
Weren't they the ones who were low mileage and their father was still going to coach them at NC St.?
High intensity, low mileage didn't lead to steady long term improvement? Really?
YMMV wrote:
Ivanka's leadership wrote:
Weren't they the ones who were low mileage and their father was still going to coach them at NC St.?
High intensity, low mileage didn't lead to steady long term improvement? Really?
Yes, I recall them reportedly doing "tempo" runs in the 5:10-5:20 range, essentially racing on an almost daily basis. The same approach that was "make and break" for Kim Mortensen.
Face Farter wrote:
YMMV wrote:
Ivanka's leadership wrote:
Weren't they the ones who were low mileage and their father was still going to coach them at NC St.?
High intensity, low mileage didn't lead to steady long term improvement? Really?
Yes, I recall them reportedly doing "tempo" runs in the 5:10-5:20 range, essentially racing on an almost daily basis. The same approach that was "make and break" for Kim Mortensen.
We’re not pretending that this is why Kim Mortensen didn’t have long term success, are we?
dsrunner wrote:
Your thinking is flawed.
Runners can make training errors and experience injury / setbacks and burnout with high, low or moderate mileage.
The limiting factor for the Frazier sisters is far more likely to be speed side capability than training volume, and NCAA competition is also far more demanding than HS, with few easy races.
As a woman moves up in the national rankings in the 1500 or 3000, it becomes important to have something close to 1:59 - 2:02 800 capability.